Annex 14 — Aerodromes Volume I
Table 6-1. Characteristics of obstacle lights
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Peak intensity (cd) at given Background
Luminance (b)
Light
Signal type/ Day Twilight Night Distribution
Light Type Colour (flash rate) (Above 500 cd/m2) (50-500 cd/m2) (Below 50 cd/m2) Table
Low-intensity, Type A Red Fixed
N/A N/A 10
(fixed obstacle) Table 6-2
Low-intensity, Type B Red Fixed
N/A N/A 32
(fixed obstacle) Table 6-2
Low-intensity, Type C Yellow/Blue Flashing
N/A 40 40
(mobile obstacle) (a) (60-90 fpm) Table 6-2
Low-intensity, Type D Yellow Flashing
N/A 200 200
(follow-me vehicle) (60–90 fpm) Table 6-2
Low-intensity, Type E Red Flashing Table 6-2
N/A N/A 32
(c) (Type B)
Medium-intensity, Type A White Flashing
20 000 20 000 2 000
(20–60 fpm) Table 6-3
Medium-intensity, Type B Red Flashing
N/A N/A 2 000
(20–60 fpm) Table 6-3
Medium-intensity, Type C Red Fixed N/A N/A 2 000 Table 6-3
High-intensity, White Flashing
200 000 20 000 2 000
Type A (40–60 fpm) Table 6-3
High-intensity, White Flashing
100 000 20 000 2 000
Type B (40–60 fpm) Table 6-3
a) See 6.2.2.6
b) For flashing lights, effective intensity as determined in accordance with the Aerodrome Design Manual (Doc 9157), Part 4.
c) For wind turbine application, to flash at the same rate as the lighting on the nacelle.
10/11/16 6-4
Chapter 6 Annex 14 —Aerodromes
Table 6-2. Light distribution for low-intensity obstacle lights
Minimum intensity Maximum intensity Vertical beam spread
(a) (a) (f)
Minimum beam spread Intensity
Type A 10 cd (b) N/A 10° 5 cd
Type B 32 cd (b) N/A 10° 16 cd
Type C 40 cd (b) 400 cd 12° (d) 20 cd
Type D 200 cd (c) 400 cd N/A (e) N/A
Note.— This table does not include recommended horizontal beam spreads. 6.2.1.3 requires 360° coverage around an obstacle.
Therefore, the number of lights needed to meet this requirement will depend on the horizontal beam spreads of each light as well as the
shape of the obstacle. Thus, with narrower beam spreads, more lights will be required.
a) 360° horizontal. For flashing lights, the intensity is read into effective intensity, as determined in accordance with the Aerodrome
Design Manual (Doc 9157), Part 4.
b) Between 2 and 10° vertical. Elevation vertical angles are referenced to the horizontal when the light is levelled.
c) Between 2 and 20° vertical. Elevation vertical angles are referenced to the horizontal when the light is levelled.
d) Peak intensity should be located at approximately 2.5° vertical.
e) Peak intensity should be located at approximately 17° vertical.
f) Beam spread is defined as the angle between the horizontal plane and the directions for which the intensity exceeds that mentioned in
the “intensity” column.
Table 6-3. Light distribution for medium- and high-intensity obstacle lights
according to benchmark intensities of Table 6-1
Benchmark Minimum requirements Recommendations
intensity
Vertical elevation angle (b) Vertical elevation angle (b)
Vertical beam spread Vertical beam spread
0° -1° (c) 0° -1° -10° (c)
Minimum Minimum Maximum
average Minimum Minimum beam Maximum Maximum Maximum beam
intensity intensity intensity spread Intensity intensity intensity intensity spread Intensity
(a) (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) (a)
200 000 200 000 150 000 75 000 3° 75 000 250 000 112 500 7 500 7° 75 000
100 000 100 000 75 000 37 500 3° 37 500 125 000 56 250 3 750 7° 37 500
20 000 20 000 15 000 7 500 3° 7 500 25 000 11 250 750 N/A N/A
2 000 2 000 1 500 750 3° 750 2 500 1 125 75 N/A N/A
Note.— This table does not include recommended horizontal beam spreads. 6.2.1.3 requires 360° coverage around an obstacle.
Therefore, the number of lights needed to meet this requirement will depend on the horizontal beam spreads of each light as well as the
shape of the obstacle. Thus, with narrower beam spreads, more lights will be required.
a) 360° horizontal. All intensities are expressed in Candela. For flashing lights, the intensity is read into effective intensity, as determined
in accordance with the Aerodrome Design Manual (Doc 9157), Part 4.
b) Elevation vertical angles are referenced to the horizontal when the light unit is levelled.
c) Beam spread is defined as the angle between the horizontal plane and the directions for which the intensity exceeds that mentioned in
the “intensity” column.
Note.— An extended beam spread may be necessary under specific configuration and justified by an aeronautical study.
6-5 10/11/16
Tere
Lennuvälja läheduses asuv kraana peab kindlasti olema ööpäevaringselt valgustatud. Kraana kõrgeimasse
punkti ja võimalusel ka noole otsa tuleb paigaldada punane pidevalt põlev tuli (parameetrid vt manuses
olevast tabelist, low-intensity type B).
Kui kraana ületab lennuvälja lähiümbruse horisontaalset piirangupinda (absoluutkõrgus 84 meetrit),
tuleb sellest teavitada Lennuametit (
[email protected]) ja lennujaama ohutusjuhti
(
[email protected]), et saaksime välja anda hoiatuse lennuvälja kasutavatele pilootidele. Teates
peavad sisalduma kraana asukoha koordinaadid, tipu kõrgus ja piirangupinna läbimise kestus päeva
(soovitavalt kellaajalise) täpsusega. Teate kraana püstitamisest palume saata võimalikult vara, et hoiatus
kõigi asjasse puutuvate pilootideni jõuaks. Kui kraana püstitamise hetkel pole töö lõpukuupäev teada,
tuleb lisada eeldatav kuupäev, mida hiljem saab täpsustada.
Täiendavatele küsimustele vastan esimesel võimalusel.
Tervitades
Andres Lainoja
Lennuliiklusteeninduse ja lennuväljade osakonna vaneminspektor
+372 610 3590
www.ecaa.ee | Lõõtsa 5, Tallinn 11415
Lennuamet
From: Martin Vilismäe <
[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 12:29 PM
To: Andres Lainoja <
[email protected]>; Lennuamet <
[email protected]>
Subject: Valukoja 10 ehitustööd
Tere!
Kirjutan seoses Valukoja 10, Tallinn ehitustöödega. Soovime platsile paigaldada tornkraana (alguses üks,
hiljem teine juurde).
Mis on kraana valiku olulised aspektid/piirangud seoses lennujaama lähedusega?
Lugupidamisega,
Martin Vilismäe
Fund Ehitus OÜ
Objektijuht
+372 55 14 386
[email protected]