Sepapaja tn 1 büroohoone ehitusloa taotluse kooskõlastamine

Annex 14 — Aerodromes Volume I Table 6-1. Characteristics of obstacle lights 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Peak intensity (cd) at given Background Luminance (b) Light Signal type/ Day Twilight Night Distribution Light Type Colour (flash rate) (Above 500 cd/m2) (50-500 cd/m2) (Below 50 cd/m2) Table Low-intensity, Type A Red Fixed N/A N/A 10 (fixed obstacle) Table 6-2 Low-intensity, Type B Red Fixed N/A N/A 32 (fixed obstacle) Table 6-2 Low-intensity, Type C Yellow/Blue Flashing N/A 40 40 (mobile obstacle) (a) (60-90 fpm) Table 6-2 Low-intensity, Type D Yellow Flashing N/A 200 200 (follow-me vehicle) (60–90 fpm) Table 6-2 Medium-intensity, Type A White Flashing 20 000 20 000 2 000 (20–60 fpm) Table 6-3 Medium-intensity, Type B Red Flashing N/A N/A 2 000 (20–60 fpm) Table 6-3 Medium-intensity, Type C Red Fixed N/A N/A 2 000 Table 6-3 High-intensity, White Flashing 200 000 20 000 2 000 Type A (40–60 fpm) Table 6-3 High-intensity, White Flashing 100 000 20 000 2 000 Type B (40–60 fpm) Table 6-3 a) See 6.2.2.6 b) For flashing lights, effective intensity as determined in accordance with the Aerodrome Design Manual (Doc 9157), Part 4. 14/11/13 6-4 Chapter 6 Annex 14 —Aerodromes Table 6-2. Light distribution for low-intensity obstacle lights Minimum intensity Maximum intensity Vertical beam spread (a) (a) (f) Minimum beam spread Intensity Type A 10 cd (b) N/A 10° 5 cd Type B 32 cd (b) N/A 10° 16 cd Type C 40 cd (b) 400 cd 12° (d) 20 cd Type D 200 cd (c) 400 cd N/A (e) N/A Note.— This table does not include recommended horizontal beam spreads. 6.2.1.3 requires 360° coverage around an obstacle. Therefore, the number of lights needed to meet this requirement will depend on the horizontal beam spreads of each light as well as the shape of the obstacle. Thus, with narrower beam spreads, more lights will be required. a) 360° horizontal. For flashing lights, the intensity is read into effective intensity, as determined in accordance with the Aerodrome Design Manual (Doc 9157), Part 4. b) Between 2 and 10° vertical. Elevation vertical angles are referenced to the horizontal when the light is levelled. c) Between 2 and 20° vertical. Elevation vertical angles are referenced to the horizontal when the light is levelled. d) Peak intensity should be located at approximately 2.5° vertical. e) Peak intensity should be located at approximately 17° vertical. f) Beam spread is defined as the angle between the horizontal plane and the directions for which the intensity exceeds that mentioned in the “intensity” column. Table 6-3. Light distribution for medium- and high-intensity obstacle lights according to benchmark intensities of Table 6-1 Benchmark Minimum requirements Recommendations intensity Vertical elevation angle (b) Vertical elevation angle (b) Vertical beam spread Vertical beam spread 0° -1° (c) 0° -1° -10° (c) Minimum Minimum Maximum average Minimum Minimum beam Maximum Maximum Maximum beam intensity intensity intensity spread Intensity intensity intensity intensity spread Intensity (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) 200 000 200 000 150 000 75 000 3° 75 000 250 000 112 500 7 500 7° 75 000 100 000 100 000 75 000 37 500 3° 37 500 125 000 56 250 3 750 7° 37 500 20 000 20 000 15 000 7 500 3° 7 500 25 000 11 250 750 N/A N/A 2 000 2 000 1 500 750 3° 750 2 500 1 125 75 N/A N/A Note.— This table does not include recommended horizontal beam spreads. 6.2.1.3 requires 360° coverage around an obstacle. Therefore, the number of lights needed to meet this requirement will depend on the horizontal beam spreads of each light as well as the shape of the obstacle. Thus, with narrower beam spreads, more lights will be required. a) 360° horizontal. All intensities are expressed in Candela. For flashing lights, the intensity is read into effective intensity, as determined in accordance with the Aerodrome Design Manual (Doc 9157), Part 4. b) Elevation vertical angles are referenced to the horizontal when the light unit is levelled. c) Beam spread is defined as the angle between the horizontal plane and the directions for which the intensity exceeds that mentioned in the “intensity” column. Note.— An extended beam spread may be necessary under specific configuration and justified by an aeronautical study. 6-5 14/11/13  Merlyn Pokk Teie 13.11.2017 Tallinna Linnaplaneerimise Amet Vabaduse väljak 7 Meie 16.11.2017 nr 4.6-8/17/5665-2 15198 TALLINN Sepapaja tn 1 büroohoone ehitusloa taotluse kooskõlastamine Austatud pr Pokk Tallinnas asuv Sepapaja tn 1 kinnistu (katastritunnus 78403:315:0203) asub Lennart Meri Tallinna lennuvälja lähiümbruse sisemises horisontaalpiirangupinnas (absoluutkõrgus 84,25 meetrit). Sepapaja tn 1 kinnistule kavandatav hoone läbib nimetatud piirangupinda 5,25 meetri ulatuses (hoone absoluutkõrgus on ehitusloa taotluse nr 1711271/27370 kohaselt 89,5 meetrit). Kavandatava hoone ja lennuvälja territooriumi vahel asub suurema absoluutkõrgusega hooneid, millele teostatud lennundusalaste ekspertiiside alusel saab väita, et Sepapaja tn 1 kinnistule kavandatav hoone ei mõjuta praeguseid ega eeldatavaid tulevasi instrumentaallähenemise protseduure. Lähtudes eeltoodust ning vastavalt lennundusseaduse § 35 lõikele 4 kooskõlastab Lennuamet Sepapaja tn 1 hoone ehitusloa taotluse järgmistel tingimustel:  Vastavalt Rahvusvahelise Tsiviillennunduse Konventsiooni Lisa 14 (ICAO Annex 14) 1. köite punktile 6.2.3.19 tuleb hoone katuse nurkadesse paigaldada madalintensiivsusega tüüp B (low-intensity type B) lennuohutustuled (tulede parameetrid vt lisas).  Ehitustegevuse alustamisel kooskõlastada Lennuametiga üle 45 meetri kõrguse ehitustehnika (sh kraanade) kõrgus ja valgustustingimused.  Peale hoone täiskõrguse saavutamist teostada hoone nurgapunktide ja kõrgeima punkti koordinaatide ja kõrguse ülemõõtmine, mille tulemused edastada Lennuametile. Lugupidamisega (allkirjastatud digitaalselt) Mari Reinfeldt Õigusnõunik peadirektori osalistes ülesannetes Lisa: ICAO Annex 14 tabel 6-1 Andres Lainoja 610 3590 [email protected] Lõõtsa 5 / 11415 Tallinn / 610 3500 / [email protected] / www.ecaa.ee Registrikood 70000800