Tarbijakaitse ja Tehnilise Järelevalve Amet Endla 10A 10122 Tallinn Meie: 1 8.02 .202 5 nr KV2025-058
[email protected] Taotlus hankelepingu nr 8/2019/EE-2 „ Design and design supervision services for the construction of the new line from Pärnu to Rapla ” muutmise kooskõlastamiseks Vastavalt OÜ Rail Baltic Estonia hankekorra punktile 3 5 edastame kooskõlastamiseks hankelepingu nr 8/2019/EE-2 „Design and design supervision services for the construction of the new line from Pärnu to Rapla ” mis on sõlmitud 29.03.2019 . Lugupidamisega Liisi Heiskonen Hankeüksuse juht (allkirjastatud digitaalselt) Lisa d : 8/2019/EE-2 h ankelepingu muutmise otsus e ettepanek 8/2019/EE-2 k ooskõlastatud lepingu muudatus
CONTRACT AMENDMENT 8 LEPINGUMUUDATUS 8
nr. 8/2019/EE-2 nr. 8/2019/EE-2
Date in digital signature Kuupäev digiallkirjas
OÜ Rail Baltic Estonia (hereinafter referred to as the OÜ Rail Baltic Estonia (edaspidi „Rakendusasutus (IB)“),
"Implementing Body (IB)"), registered office at registrikood 12734109, asukohaga Veskiposti 2/1, 10138
Veskiposti 2/1, 10138 Tallinn, Republic of Estonia, Tallinn, Eesti Vabariik, keda esindab juhatuse esimees Anvar
registry code 12734109, represented by chairman of Salomets
the board Anvar Salomets
and ja
IDOM, CONSULTING, ENGINEERING, IDOM, CONSULTING, ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURE S.A.U.,
ARCHITECTURE S.A.U., a company duly incorporated Hispaania kuningriigi registrikood A48283964, asukohaga
and operating under the laws of the Kingdom of Avenida Zarandoa 23, Bilbao, Spain (edaspidi nimetatud
Spain, registration number: A48283964, tax „Konsultant“), keda esindab volituse alusel taristudirektor
registration No A-48-283964, registered address: Juan Ramón López Laborda,
Avenida Zarandoa 23, Bilbao, Spain, hereinafter
referred to as “the Consultant”, represented by the
Infrastructures Managing Director Juan Ramón
López Laborda acting in accordance with the power
of attorney dated 25.10.2017, No 1/2017/13.806.0
issued by Biscay Companies Register, at Avenida de
Madariaga, 24, 48014, Bilbao
individually hereinafter also referred to as the keda nimetatakse eraldi edaspidi ka “Pool” või ühiselt
"Party" or collectively as the "Parties", based on § “Pooled”, lepivad tuginedes riigihangete seaduse § 123 lõike
123 section 1 subsection 1 of Estonian Public 1 punktile 1 29.03.2019.a. sõlmitud lepingu nr 8/2019/EE-2
Procurement Act and article 61 section 1 p 3 and (edaspidi “Leping”) muutmises käesoleva
section 5 of Latvian Public Procurement Law agree to lepingumuudatusega (edaspidi “Lepingumuudatus”)
amend the contract no 8/2019/EE-2 dated alljärgnevalt:
29.03.2019 (hereinafter referred to as the
"Contract") by this amendment (hereinafter referred
to as the "Amendment") as follows:
1. IMPLEMENTING MODIFICATIONS 1. MUUDATUSTÖÖDE TEOSTAMINE
1.1. VO-LET_0251 - As additional design, the 1.1. VO-LET_0251 - Lisatööna projekteeritakse
staircase to Kaisma station on the eastern riigiteel 58 asuva Viluvere viadukti idapoolsel
embankment of the Viluvere viaduct on muldkehal oleva Kaisma jaama viiv trepistik
state road 58 shall be designed at the level põhiprojekti tasemel. Töö sisaldab trepi
of Master Design. The work includes modelleerimist, tugiseinte kandvus- ja
modelling of the staircase, calculations of püsivusarvutusi, kululoendit, eelarvet jm.
the bearing capacity and stability of the 1.2. VO LET_0120 - DS1 kohalike peatuste platvormid
supporting walls, cost estimate, budget, etc. ühtlustatakse kõrgusele 760mm.
1.2. VO LET_0120 - Platforms for DS1 local stops 1.3. VO LET_0255 - IB tasub raudteelõikude RW1400
will be redesigned to height 760mm. ja RW1500 ehituslubade kallinemise.
1.3. VO LET_0255 - IB will pay for the additional 1.4. VO LET_KV2024-309 - Lepinguliste tööde mahust
cost of the construction permits for sections arvestatakse välja DS1 DPS1 Kohila
RW1400 and RW1500. liiklussõlmega (BP11 ja BP12) seonduvad
1
1.4. VO LET_KV2024-309 - The scope of works tegemata tööd (hankimata ehitusload ning osad
shall be adjusted and unfinished works sisseviimata tehnilised kommentaarid).
(unacquired building permits and part of the 1.5. VO LET_KV2024-117 - Lepinguliste tööde mahust
unimplemented technical comments) arvestatakse välja DS1 DPS2 Pureva ja Röa
related to DS1 DPS1 Kohila junction (BP11 rajatistega (BP04 ja BP05) seonduvad tegemata
and BP12) shall be excluded. tööd (hankimata ehitusload).
1.5. VO LET_KV2024-117 - DS1 DPS2 unfinished 1.6. Tellija nõue tagasimakseks - Konsultandi
works (unacquired building permits) for the kohustustest arvestatakse tagasi IB poolt
Pureva and Röa facilities (BP04 and BP05) makstud riigilõivud seoses DS1 DPS1
shall be excluded from the scope of works. ehitusloaga.
1.6. Client request of reimbursement - From the
Consultant's liabilities, the fees paid by IB in
relation to the DS1 DPS1 building permit
shall be recovered.
2. IMPACT OF THE AMENDMENT ON FEES 2. MUUDATUSE MÕJU TASULE
2.1. As a result of the modifications, the value of the 2.1. Muudatustööde tulemusena suureneb Lepingu
Contract will increase by 36 540.00 € (excluding maksumus 36 540,00 € võrra (ilma käibemaksuta) ning
VAT) and decrease by 14 930.00 € (excluding väheneb 14 930,00 € võrra (ilma käibemaksuta), mis
VAT) making the total value of the Contract teeb Lepingu kogumaksumuseks 7 175 051,55 € ilma
7 175 051.55 € excluding VAT. The additioanl käibemaksuta. Lisanduv maksumus jaguneb
cost is broken down as follows: järgmiselt:
2.1.1. for the amendment specified in section 2.1.1. punktis 1.1. nimetatud tööde eest suureneb
1.1. the price of contract shall increase by 13 960 Lepingu hind 13 960 € võrra käibemaksuta;
€ excluding VAT; 2.1.2. punktis 1.2. nimetatud tööde eest suureneb
2.1.2. for the amendment specified in section Lepingu hind 9 000 € võrra käibemaksuta;
1.2. the price of contract shall increase by 9 000 2.1.3. punktis 1.3 nimetatud tööde eest suureneb
€ excluding VAT; Lepingu hind 13 580 € võrra käibemaksuta;
2.1.3. for the amendment specified in section 2.1.4. punktis 1.4 nimetatud muudatuse tulemusena
1.3. the price of contract shall increase by 13 580 väheneb Lepingu hind 7 560 € võrra käibemaksuta;
€ excluding VAT; 2.1.5. punktis 1.5 nimetatud muudatuse tulemusena
2.1.4. for the amendment specified in section väheneb Lepingu hind 1 430 € võrra käibemaksuta;
1.4. the price of contract shall decrease by 7560 2.1.6. punktis 1.4 nimetatud muudatuse tulemusena
€ excluding VAT; väheneb Lepingu hind 5 940 € võrra käibemaksuta.
2.1.5. for the amendment specified in section
1.5. the price of contract shall decrease by 1430
€ excluding VAT;
2.1.6. for the amendment specified in section
1.6. the price of contract shall decrease by 5940
€ excluding VAT.
3. LÕPPSÄTTED
3.1. Lepingumuudatus jõustub allkirjastamisest.
3. FINAL PROVISIONS 3.2. Kõik teised Lepingu tingimused jäävad kehtima
3.1. The Contract Amendment shall enter into muutmatul kujul.
force upon signing.
3.2. All other terms and conditions of the
Agreement shall remain unchanged.
2
4. ANNEXES 4. LISAD
At the time of the signing, contract amendment Lepingumuudatuse sõlmimise hetkel on lepingumuudatusel
has following annexes: järgmised lisad:
Annex 1 –Amended Form of Agreement; Lisa 1 – Amended Form of Agreement;
Annex 2 –EEDS1 Amended Appendix 1; Lisa 2 – EEDS1 Amended Appendix 1;
Annex 3 – EEDDS1 Amended Appendix 3; Lisa 3 – EEDDS1 Amended Appendix 3;
Annex 4 – EEDS1 Amended Appendix 4. Lisa 4 – EEDS1 Amended Appendix 4.
Rakendusüksus/Implemending Body: Konsultant/ Consultant:
OÜ Rail Baltic Estonia IDOM, CONSULTING, ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURE S.A.U.
Registry code / registrikood: 12734109 Registry code /registrikood: A48283964
Address / aadress: Address / aadress: Avenida Zarandoa 23, Bilbao, Spain
Veskiposti 2/1, 10138 Tallinn, Eesti Vabariik e-post:
[email protected]
E-mail:
[email protected]
/signed digitally/ /signed digitally/
/allkirjastatud digitaalselt/ /allkirjastatud digitaalselt/
Anvar Salomets Iban Mirones Truan
Chairman of the board Rail Systems Director
Juhatuse esimees Raudteesüsteemide direktor
3
AGREEMENT Amendment no 8
Design and design supervision services for the construction of the
new line from Pärnu to Rapla
Agreement registration No 8/2019/EE-2
CEF1 Agreement No 2014-EU-TMC-0560-M
Procurement identification No RBR 2017/27
This agreement amendment no 8 (hereinafter called the Agreement Amendment) has been
entered into on [Date of the document is the date of the time stamp of the last enclosed qualified
electronic signature]
Whereas:
1. On 29.03.2019 the agreement on Design and Design Supervision Services for the
construction of the new line from Pärnu to Rapla was concluded (hereinafter called the
“Agreement”).
2. The Consultant (IDOM, CONSULTING, ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURE S.A.U.)
submitted Variation request on 17.06.2022 ref RBR- EE-DS1-0120-PRM-20220617_EN .
3. The Consultant (IDOM, CONSULTING, ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURE S.A.U.)
submitted Variation request on 02.08.2024 ref RBR-EE-DS1-LET-0255-PRM-
20240712_EN.
4. The Consultant (IDOM, CONSULTING, ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURE S.A.U.)
submitted Variation request on 28.05.2024 ref RBR-EE-DS1-LET-0251-PRM-
20240528_EN.
5. The Consultant (IDOM, CONSULTING, ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURE S.A.U.) and the
Client (Rail Baltic Estonia OÜ) agreed on Variation on 09.10.2024 ref KV2024-309_RE
Kohila junction omission of design services 3.
6. The Consultant (IDOM, CONSULTING, ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURE S.A.U.) and the
Client (Rail Baltic Estonia OÜ) agreed on Variation on 10.04.2024 ref KV2024-117 General
Notice – Response To Re DPS2 BP04 and BP05 Omission of Design Services.
7. The Client (Rail Baltic Estonia OÜ) reclaims from The Consultant ((IDOM, CONSULTING,
ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURE S.A.U.) building permit state fees paid for EE DS1 DPS1
building permit no 2211271/28580.
8. On 19.11.2024 RBE Management Board decision nr. 047_19.11.2024 was made to
approve the Variation Notices, granting the Consultant requested extension of time and
additional remuneration for following additional works:
1. VO LET_0251, additional remuneration of 13,960.00€ and extension of time – 3
months for DPS5 BP-04 (Master Design and Detailed Technical Design)
2. VO LET_0120, additional remuneration of 9,000.00€ and extension of time – 1.25
months for DPS1 BP-07 (Master Design and Detailed Technical Design).
3. VO LET_0255, additional remuneration of 13,580.00€ and no extension of time.
4. VO LET_ KV2024-309, additional remuneration of negative 7,560.00€ and no
extension of time.
OÜ Rail Baltic Estonia Reg. nr: 12734109 Tel. +372 686 7067
Veskiposti 2/1 VAT: EE101954107 E-mail:
[email protected]
10138 Tallinn www.rbestonia.ee
5. VO LET_ KV2024-117, additional remuneration of negative 1,430.00€ and no
extension of time.
6. Building permit application fee, additional remuneration of negative 5,940.00€
and no extension of time.
The Parties of the Agreement are:
IDOM, CONSULTING, ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURE S.A.U., a company duly
incorporated and operating under the laws of the Kingdom of Spain, registration number:
A48283964, tax registration No A-48-283964, registered address: Avenida Zarandoa 23,
Bilbao, Spain, hereinafter referred to as “the Consultant”, represented by the
Infrastructures Managing Director Juan Ramón López Laborda acting in accordance with
the power of attorney dated 25.10.2017, No 1/2017/13.806.0 issued by Biscay Companies
Register, at Avenida de Madariaga, 24, 48014, Bilbao,
and
RAIL BALTIC ESTONIA OÜ, registration number: 12734109, registered address: Veskiposti
2/1, Tallinn, 10138, Estonia, hereinafter referred to as “the Implementing Body”.
Hereby agree:
1. SUBJECT MATTER
1. The Article 1 clause 1 subclause d), f) and g) shall be amended and new Appendix
1, Appendix 3 and Appendix 4 are added to this Agreement Amendment.
2. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall continue in force in corpore.
2. MISCELLANEOUS
1. The terms used in these Agreement with capital letters have the same meaning as
defined in the Agreement unless this Amendment provides otherwise.
2. The Amendment shall enter into force upon its signing on the date shown
hereinbelow.
3. Any amendment to this Amendment shall be in writing and shall have no effect
before signed by duly authorized representatives of all Parties.
4. This Amendment shall be considered as an integral and inseparable part of the
Agreement.
5. This Amendment is prepared in three (3) pages and executed in one (1) unique
electronic copy. This Amendment has been signed by the duly authorized
representative of the Parties.
2
Signatures of the Parties:
On behalf of the Implementing Body : On behalf of the Consultant:
Name Surname: Anvar Salomets Name Surname: Iban Mirones Truan
Position: Chairman of the Management Board Position: Rail Systems Director
Authorization basis: Authorization basis:
Agreement on Reassignment of Responsibilities Power of attorney dated 28 February 2023 No
Dated 01 March 2024 Three hundred and fifty-six
THIS DOCUMENT IS SIGNED ELECTRONICALLY WITH A QUALIFIED ELECTRONIC
SIGNATURE
AND CONTAINS A TIME STAMP
3
2dAPPENDIX NO 1: TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION
FOR
Design and design supervision services for the
construction of the new line from Pärnu to Rapla
Riga, 2019
- 1 / 52 -
1. GENERAL .............................................................................................................................................. 4
1.1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................................... 4
1.2. ABBREVIATIONS AND TERMS ............................................................................................................................................... 5
1.3. LEGAL REFERENCES................................................................................................................................................................ 9
1.4. RAIL BALTICA GLOBAL PROJECT REFERENCES .................................................................................................................. 10
1.5. CONSOLIDATED PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL DESIGN ........................................................................................................ 10
1.6. PRELIMINARY DESIGN ......................................................................................................................................................... 11
1.7. ADDITIONAL STUDIES ......................................................................................................................................................... 11
1.8. NATIONAL STATE INSTITUTIONS RELATED TO THE DESIGN SERVICES............................................................................ 12
1.9. OPERATIONAL PLAN ........................................................................................................................................................... 12
1.10. BUILDING INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (BIM) ............................................................................................................ 13
2. SCOPE OF THE SERVICES................................................................................................................... 16
2.1. MAIN TASKS ........................................................................................................................................................................ 16
2.2. COUNTRY SPECIFIC SCOPE OF THE DESIGN SERVICES ..................................................................................................... 18
2.3. MAIN OBJECTS .................................................................................................................................................................... 19
2.4. CLIENT’S RESPONSIBILITY ................................................................................................................................................... 20
2.5. DESIGN PRIORITY SECTIONS ............................................................................................................................................... 21
2.6. CONSTRUCTION OBJECTS ................................................................................................................................................... 21
2.7. DESIGN EXPERTISE AND CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT ...................................................................................................... 24
2.8. BUILDING PERMITS’ RECEIVAL PROCESS ........................................................................................................................... 24
2.9. AFFECTED PARTIES’ OBJECTS .............................................................................................................................................. 25
3. DESIGN PROCESS .............................................................................................................................. 26
3.1. SITE INVESTIGATION ........................................................................................................................................................... 26
3.2. VALUE ENGINEERING .......................................................................................................................................................... 26
3.3. MASTER DESIGN STRUCTURE............................................................................................................................................. 30
3.4. DETAIL TECHNICAL DESIGN STRUCTURE .......................................................................................................................... 32
3.5. DETAIL TECHNICAL DESIGN REVIEW AND APPROVAL...................................................................................................... 33
3.6. MEETINGS ............................................................................................................................................................................ 33
3.7. RISK MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................................................................................ 36
3.8. LANGUAGE ........................................................................................................................................................................... 36
4. SCOPE OF DELIVERABLES ................................................................................................................. 38
4.2. DESIGN DELIVERABLES ........................................................................................................................................................ 38
4.3. AGREEMENT IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS DELIVERABLES ................................................................................................ 39
4.4. BILL OF QUANTITIES ............................................................................................................................................................ 39
4.5. VISUALISATION OF TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS...................................................................................................................... 39
5. DESIGN SUPERVISION PROCESS ...................................................................................................... 40
6. CONSULTANT’S TEAM ...................................................................................................................... 41
6.1. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSULTANT’S TEAM MEMBERS ................................................................................... 41
6.2. REQUIREMENTS FOR KEY-EXPERTS .................................................................................................................................... 42
6.3. APPROVAL PROCESS OF KEY-EXPERTS............................................................................................................................... 45
6.4. CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR KEY-EXPERTS .......................................................................................................... 45
6.5. CHANGE PROCEDURE FOR THE KEY-EXPERTS ................................................................................................................... 46
6.6. ADDITIONAL EXPERTS ......................................................................................................................................................... 46
- 2 / 52 -
7. QUALITY ASSURANCE ....................................................................................................................... 47
8. ANNEXES ............................................................................................................................................ 49
- 3 / 52 -
1. GENERAL
1.1. Introduction
The Baltic countries Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania have historically been linked to the east-west railway
transport axis using the 1520 mm gauge railway system. Because of the existing historical and technical
constraints, the existing rail system is incompatible with mainland European standards, thus there is a
consensus that Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania need to be fully integrated into the wider European rail
transport system. Currently there is no efficient 1435 mm railway connection along the Warsaw-Kaunas-
Riga-Tallinn axis, i.e. there are missing links or significant bottlenecks. Thus, there are no direct passenger
or freight services along the railway axis as the existing infrastructure does not allow for competitive services
compared to alternative modes of transport. Thus, the clear majority of the North-South freight is being
transported by road transport and the overall accessibility in the region is low.
The ambitions of the Rail Baltica Global project (Global Project) are:
• to become a powerful catalyst for sustainable economic growth in the Baltic States;
• to set a new standard of passenger and freight mobility;
• to ensure a new economic corridor will emerge;
• sustainable employment and educational opportunities;
• an environmentally sustainable infrastructure;
• new opportunities for multimodal freight logistics development;
• new intermodal transport solutions for passengers;
• safety and performance improvements;
• a new value platform for digitalization and innovation;
• completion of Baltic integration in the European Union transport ecosystem.
Rail Baltica is already designed to become a part of the EU TEN-T North Sea – Baltic Core Network Corridor,
which links Europe’s largest ports of Rotterdam, Hamburg and Antwerp – through the Netherlands, Belgium,
Germany and Poland – with the three Baltic States, further connecting to Finland via the Gulf of Finland
short sea shipping connections with a future fixed link possibility between Tallinn and Helsinki. Further
northbound extension of this corridor shall pave the way for future connectivity also with the emerging
Arctic corridor, especially in light of the lucrative prospects of the alternative Northern Circle maritime route
development between Europe and Asia. Furthermore, the North Sea – Baltic Corridor crosses with the Baltic-
Adriatic Corridor in Warsaw, paving the way for new supply chain development between the Baltic and
Adriatic seas, connecting the Baltics with the hitherto inadequately accessible Southern European markets.
In a similar fashion, Rail Baltica shall strengthen the synergies between North-South and West-East freight
flows, creating new transshipment and logistics development opportunities along the Europe and Asia
overland trade routes. The new Rail Baltica infrastructure would, therefore, not only put the Baltics firmly on
the European rail logistics map, but also create massive opportunities for value creation along this
infrastructure with such secondary economic benefits as commercial property development, revitalization
of dilapidated urban areas, private spin-off investment, new business formation, technology transfer and
innovation, tourism development and other catalytic effects. Rail Baltica aims to promote these effects from
the early stages of the Global Project, learning from the key global success stories and benchmarks in this
regard.
The contracting authority RB Rail AS was established by the Republics of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, via
state-owned holding companies, to coordinate the development and construction of the fast-conventional
standard gauge railway line on the North Sea – Baltic TEN-T Core Network Corridor (Rail Baltica II) linking
three Baltic states with Poland and the rest of the EU.
The shareholders structure of RBR is presented in Figure 1.
- 4 / 52 -
Figure 1. The shareholders structure.
RBR together with governments of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania (represented by the ministries in charge of
transport policy) have applied for the CEF co-financing in 2015, 2016 and 2017 (three applications in total).
Three applications were successful and INEA grants are available to support the Global Project expenses.
Rail Baltica is a joint project of three EU Member States – Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania – and concerns the
building of a fast conventional double track 1435 mm gauge electrified railway line on the route from Tallinn
through Pärnu (EE), Riga (LV), Riga International Airport (LV), Panevėžys (LT), Kaunas (LT) to the
Lithuania/Poland state border (including connection Kaunas - Vilnius). In the longer term, the railway line
could potentially be extended to include a fixed link between Helsinki and Tallinn, as well as integrate the
railway link to Warsaw and beyond.
The expected core outcome of the Rail Baltica project is a European gauge (1435mm) double-track railway
line of almost 900 km in length meant for both passenger and freight transport and the required additional
infrastructure (to ensure full operability of the railway). It will be interoperable with the TEN-T Network in
the rest of Europe and competitive in terms of quality with other modes of transport in the region. The
indicative timeline and phasing of the project implementation can be found here:
http://www.railbaltica.org/about-rail-baltica/project-timeline/.
Further information is available in http://www.railbaltica.org/
1.2. Abbreviations and terms
All abbreviations, designations, definitions and terms defined in the applicable laws, legislation, regulations,
directives, TSIs, standards, rules, this Agreement and Design Guidelines, other guidelines and documents of
RBR/Client are used in this Technical Specification without modifications if not defined otherwise further. In
this document where the context admits, the following words shall have the meaning assigned to them
hereafter:
1.2.1. Global administrative terminology
Affected parties State institutions, local government bodies, public and/or private
enterprises, legal or private entities (persons) representing the owners
and/or managers of the assets (networks and/or objects of power
supply, gas, oil, water, drainage etc.) that are linked to the designed
- 5 / 52 -
layout of Rail Baltica railway line and shall be considered during the
provision of Design Services.
Affected party Technical Technical, connection conditions and requirements issued by an
Conditions Affected party forming to be implemented by the Consultant as a part
of the scope of the Design Services.
Beneficiaries Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications of the Republic of
Estonia, Ministry of Transportation of the Republic of Latvia and Ministry
of Transport and Communications of the Republic of Lithuania.
Consolidated Preliminary Finalized results of review, evaluation and optimization of Preliminary
Technical Design (CPTD) design’s, Design’s solutions arising from interoperability, user’s and
railway business, optimum life cycle cost, efficiency, sustainable and
environmentally friendly railway operation as well as Rail Baltica Global
Project perspective. CPTD covers the set of identified necessary
modifications and improvements to be evaluated in detail within the
design phase. The improvements identified might result in railway
alignment modifications.
Consultant Service provider awarded with an Agreement to conduct the Services
specified in the present Technical Specification and Agreement.
Design guidelines Set of predefined and standardized technically and economically
justified engineering and design solutions for Rail Baltica infrastructure
to be applied at design, construction and operation phases of Rail
Baltica Railway, which forms an integral part of this Technical
Specification. The Design guidelines may be changed by the Client,
therefore the Agreement always refers to the most current version of
the Design guidelines.
Detailed Technical Design a final stage of the design process in accordance with Country’s
(DTD) construction legislation and it gives right to start construction works.
In terms of Country’s construction legislation, Detailed Technical Design
corresponds to Operational Building Design documentation
(“Tööprojekt” in Estonian) together with all requirements specified in
Technical Specification for the Detailed Technical Design.
Global project all the activities undertaken by the Rail Baltica railway implementing
parties in order to build, render operational and commercialize the Rail
Baltica railway and related railway infrastructure in accordance with the
agreed route, technical parameters and time schedule.
Implementing bodies OÜ Rail Baltic Estonia, SIA „Eiropas dzelzceļa līnijas“ and UAB „Rail
Baltica statyba".
Local facility Means geographically limited parts of railway infrastructure with
extended structural or functional elements (terminals, service facilities,
etc.) which are related or needed to ensure a safe and smooth operation
of the railway.
Local facilities are, inter alia, the following:
a passenger terminal, including passenger stations,
- 6 / 52 -
a freight terminal including railway station,
a rolling stock maintenance facility,
an infrastructure maintenance facility,
other possible facilities.
Master Design Consolidated approach of full design documentation package aimed
towards detailed technical design by considering all legal requirements
(MD)
set out in national construction legislation and following the established
design guidelines for the railway. The result of master design is a set of
documents (incl. drawings in 3D model, BIM model) which clearly shows
the scope of the project, includes a situation plan with an accurate
placement of the railway line, detailed track layout, main signalling,
contact line, electrical network details, etc. The scope of this set has to
be wide and precise enough so that the main details and the main
requirements for precise detalisation are clear.
In terms of Country’s construction legislation, Master Design
corresponds to Principal Design Documentation (”Põhiprojekt“ in
Estonian) together with all requirements specified in Technical
Specification for the Master Design.
National studies / RBR Detailed engineering and feasibility studies on implementation of Rail
studies Baltica project in each of the three Baltic states, feasibility studies and
similar activities.
Preliminary design (PD) completed pre-design stage, including special planning and
environmental impact assessment studies, of Rail Baltica railway
prepared in accordance with Country’s national construction legislation
and approved at the State level.
Rail Baltica railway a new fast conventional double track electrified European standard
gauge (1435 mm) railway line on the route from Tallinn through
Pärnu - Riga -Panevėžys - Kaunas to Lithuanian - Polish border, with
the connection of Kaunas - Vilnius.
Railway station part of a railway containing necessary sidings and necessary equipment,
which allows to perform train traffic organization (change of direction,
overtaking, crossing) and commercial (passenger exchange, freight
operations, etc.) operations. The border of a railway station is a station
border (an entry signal or a border sign).
Railway infrastructure has the same meaning as an identical term in the Directive 2012/34/EU
of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012
establishing a single European railway area (recast), as well as it includes
freight and passenger terminals and infrastructure and rolling stock
maintenance facilities and the ground underneath them and the
airspace above them to the extent that the national legislation permits
the ownership of the ground and the airspace.
Railway urban node section part of the railway located in an urban environment in an urban node
usually having one or more Local Facilities. For Rail Baltic / Rail Baltica
- 7 / 52 -
railway there are three urban nodes – Riga (LV), Tallinn (EE), Vilnius (LT)
which are listed in regulation 1315/2013 - and Kaunas (LT).
Technical Specification (TS) this document with all its Annexes.
1.2.2. Service specific terminology
Bill of Quantities (BoQ) An itemised list of materials, parts, and labour together with their unit
cost and description what is basis for cost calculation, required to
construct, install, maintain, and/or repair the infrastructure.
Classification system is described in the Detailed BIM Strategy.
BEP BIM Execution Plan – a formal document that defines how the project
will be executed, monitored and controlled with regard to BIM.
Developed at project initiation to provide important information/data
management plans and assignment of roles and responsibilities for
model creation and data integration throughout the project.
BIM Building Information Management and Asset Information Management.
Building permit Construction permit issued by state authorities based on Country’s
construction legislation.
CDE Common Data Environment. It is a central repository where construction
project information is housed. The contents of the CDE are not limited
to assets created in a “BIM environment” and it will therefore include
data, documentation, graphical model and non-graphical assets.
Classification system A systematic arrangement of design and construction work aspects
including assets, facility elements, functional and constructive systems,
products, components, etc.
Construction object Part of overall construction falling under the scope of Agreement that is
defined as separate object for which an individual design package
(covering all required documentation and approvals to receive a
Building permit) is prepared allowing to have a separate construction
(including construction tendering) and taking-over process in
accordance with Country’s construction legislation.
Country Republic of Estonia.
Design Section Section(s) of overall Rail Baltica railway line falling under the scope of
the Services.
Design Priority Section Part of Design Section identified as separate Rail Baltica railway line
section for planning of the Design Services and management purposes.
EIA Environmental Impact Assessment.
EIR Client’s (Employer’s) Information Requirements. Usually in context to
BIM as BIM EIR. It defines the information that will be required from the
Consultant for the development of the project and for the operation of
the completed built asset.
LOD Level of Development.
- 8 / 52 -
Notified Body (NoBo) a body responsible for assessing the conformity or suitability for use of
the interoperability constituents or for appraising the ‘EC’ procedure for
verification of the subsystems.
Programme Representation (including graphical) of the time schedule, tasks and
milestones agreed between the Consultant and Client at the initial stage
of the Agreement’s implementation and forming a part of legal
obligations of the Consultant.
PRM Persons with reduced mobility.
Technical Working Group Group of technical experts from Client, Implementing Bodies and
(TWG) involved parties nominated by Client specifically to deal with
administrative and technical matters during Agreement
implementation.
Value Engineering (VE) analysis of different technical options from the perspective of Global
project to increase functionality for the increased value of the
infrastructure and provide the most cost-effective and efficient ways to
achieve the required final result, without jeopardising safety, quality and
overall integrity.
Conceptual design Preliminary (schematic) design level defined in BIM.
1.3. Legal references
The Consultant shall follow EU directives, all Country’s construction and other national legislation, EU
standards, Country-specific legislation/standards/rules and other legal acts applicable for the provision of
the Design Services. Main applicable legal acts (non-exhaustive list) are shown below in the chapter:
No. Title Proposed resource1
Building Code https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/520062017015
1.3.1.
/consolide
Planning Act https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/503112017001
1.3.2.
/consolide
Environmental Impact Assessment and https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/511102017003
1.3.3.
Environmental Management System Act /consolide
Requirements for road design https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/103072015029
1.3.4.
Relevant construction-related sub-acts and https://www.riigiteataja.ee/index.html
1.3.5.
decrees of Ministers of Republic of Estonia
Construction Design Documents EVS 932:2017 Estonian Standard
1.3.6.
1
Client shall not be responsible for the availability and content of the information available online (except for
www.railbaltica.org website).
- 9 / 52 -
1.4. Rail Baltica Global project references
The Consultant shall fully take into account for the purpose of completing the Services all guidelines, studies,
reports etc. developed in relation to the Rail Baltica Global project in their current version at the time of
performing the Services. Main documents are listed below:
No. Title Resource
Rail Baltica Design Guidelines2 DTD TS Annex No. 1
1.4.1.
Detailed BIM Strategy to be developed and provided during the
implementation of the Design Services
Adaptation to Climate change to be developed and provided during the
implementation of the Design Services
Architectural and landscaping, visual to be developed and provided during the
design requirements implementation of the Design Services
Operational plan to be developed and provided during the
1.4.2.
implementation of the Design Services
1.5. Consolidated Preliminary Technical Design
The Consultant shall consider the results of CPTD reports during the option analysis and Value Engineering
development as a part of Master Design preparation. CPTD reports falling under the scope of the Design
Services are listed below:
No. Title Resource
CPTD EE001: Sections 4-7 (Tootsi – Harju DTD TS Annex No. 2.1
1.5.1.
maakond).
2
Changes in Design Guidelines shall not be considered as changes of the Technical Specification. Therefore,
no ammendments in Technical Specification shall arrise due to the the changes of Design Guidelines.
- 10 / 52 -
1.6. Preliminary design
No. Title Resource3
Preliminary design of the railway and DTD TS Annex No. 3.1
1.6.1.
railway-related construction works for the
Rail Baltic 1,435 mm gauge line.
Are, Tori, Tootsi & Vändra municipality,
Pärnu county. Design Section: 04. (km
15,00 until km 30,8)
Preliminary design of the railway and DTD TS Annex No. 3.2
1.6.2.
railway-related construction works for the
Rail Baltic 1,435 mm gauge line.
Kehtna, Järvakandi, Raikküla municipality;
Rapla county. Design Section: 05. (km 0,00
until km 18,6)
Preliminary design of the railway and DTD TS Annex No. 3.3
1.6.3.
railway-related construction works for the
Rail Baltic 1,435 mm gauge line.
Kehtna, Raikküla, Rapla municipality; Rapla
county. Design Section: 06. (km 0,00 until
km 18,7)
Preliminary design of the railway and DTD TS Annex No. 3.4
1.6.4.
railway-related construction works for the
Rail Baltic 1,435 mm gauge line.
Rapla, Kohila municipality, Rapla county.
Design Section: 07. (km 0,00 until km 17,4)
Approved report of Strategic DTD TS Annex No. 3.5
1.6.5.
Environmental Assessment http://railbaltic.info/et/materjalid/keskkonnamoj
u-strateegiline-hindamine-ksh/category/1356-
heakskiidetud-ksh-aruanne-9-08-2017
Approved County Plans of Harju-, Rapla- DTD TS Annex No. 3.6
1.6.6.
and Pärnumaa Harju: http://www.maavalitsus.ee/127
Rapla: http://www.maavalitsus.ee/120
Pärnu: http://www.maavalitsus.ee/147
1.7. Additional studies
1.7.1. The Client shall provide relevant finalised and approved studies during the Agreement
implementation. All new studies (not covered in the annexes of Technical specification) that will
be handed over to Consultant or published on Rail Baltica Website, that from the Consultant’s
point of view would change DTD Technical specifications, shall be described by Consultant
during Technical or Progress meetings and Client will make final technical decision on how to
handle the study.
3
Client shall not be responsible for the availability and content of the information available online (except for
www.railbaltica.org website).
- 11 / 52 -
No. Title of delivered studies Source
Study of ensuring the supply of mineral resources for the DTD TS Annex No. 3.7
1.7.2.
construction of Rail Baltica
Archaeological studies of relevant areas along the planned DTD TS Annex No. 3.8
1.7.3.
route. (Rail Balticu trassi arheoloogiliste eeluuringute II etapi
lõpparuanne; Tartu Ülikooli ajaloo ja arheoloogia instituut,
Tartu 2015)
Study and detailed plan on technical parameters and DTD TS Annex No. 3.9
1.7.4.
functionalities for railway maintenance depot.
Study and detailed plan on technical parameters and DTD TS Annex No. 3.10
1.7.5.
functionalities for railway maintenance depot.
1.8. National state institutions related to the Design Services
1.8.1. The following table provides the list of main Country’s national state/regulatory institutions
(non-exhaustive list) as a guidance for the Consultant to consider throughout the Agreement
implementation.
No. Title Online link
Technical Regulatory Authority (Tehnilise Järelevalve Amet) https://www.tja.ee/en
1.8.2.
Building Registry, Ministry of Economic Affairs and https://www.ehr.ee/ap
1.8.3.
Communications (Majandus-ja Kommunikatsiooniministeeriumi p/esileht?0
hallatav Ehitisregister)
1.8.4. The Consultant shall consider and follow any legal acts, rules or regulations issued by the
Country’s national institutions and applicable for the implementation of the Design Services and
Design Supervision Services.
1.9. Operational plan
1.9.1. Operational Plan is under the responsibility and developed by the Client and will be followed by
other operational studies. These studies are performed in parallel to the Design Services, and
therefore exchange of information between the Consultant and Client are mandatory for the
design process of Rail Baltica railway infrastructure.
1.9.2. The Operational Plan is an outsourced study which is planned to be delivered during
implementation of the Design Services. The Operational Plan scope of work will define, inter alia,
the following parameters of Rail Baltica railway:
• General infrastructure layout;
• Design speed of every railway line section;
• Capacity of every railway line section;
• Location of stations, freight and intermodal terminal, maintenance facilities;
• Track layout of stations, freight and intermodal terminal, maintenance facilities;
• Type and location of turnouts, signals, balises and other track and signalling devices;
• Length and location of railway signalling block sections;
• Necessary facilities for tracks maintenance purposes.
- 12 / 52 -
1.9.3. Operational Plan geographical scope of work is the entire Rail Baltica railway corridor, therefore
it is a major tool allowing consistency of infrastructure design and interface between different
Design Sections.
1.9.4. Following completion of Operational Plan, operation and maintenance parameters will be
maintained and updated by the Client. The Consultant shall take into account the operation and
maintenance parameters for the performance of the Design Services. Prior starting any design
phase, the Consultant shall request approval from the Client of the operation and maintenance
parameters used as input data. All Consultant deliverables will be reviewed to assess their
compliance with operation and maintenance parameters.
1.10. Building Information Management (BIM)
1.10.1. Detailed BIM Strategy is responsibility and development by Client and is prepared within the
scope of separate contract during the implementation of Design Services and shall be a part of
Design Guidelines “Building Information Management (BIM) Employer’s Information
Requirements”.
1.10.2. Minimum content of the Detailed BIM Strategy shall define:
• CDE Design including:
▪ Exchange formats for each asset type;
▪ Recommendations for file conversion process;
▪ Roles and Responsibilities of involved parties;
▪ Delivery process and information content completeness;
▪ Validation/verification process for the delivered information;
▪ Folder Structures;
▪ Required File Naming Conventions;
▪ Required file Metadata;
▪ Required Process Controls;
▪ Revision and Version Control process;
▪ State Change process.
• BIM Manual including:
▪ BIM Modelling Standards;
▪ Tables of File Formats;
▪ CAD Standards for Drawings and CAD Models;
▪ Classification system (including the requirements for Bill of quantities).
1.10.3. The CDE and the whole document management system hosted by the Client is planned to be
implemented in 2019. The Consultant shall be aware this factor and prepare all data to ensure
compliance with the above defined BIM strategy and plan and realise a migration of data to this
platform once it is implemented and functional.
1.10.4. Design Guidelines "Building Information Management (BIM) Employer’s Information
Requirements" and developed "BIM Strategy Framework" shall be taken into account by the
Consultant during the design process. These documents set minimal requirements for:
• Model types, content and file formats;
- 13 / 52 -
• BIM execution plan (for more detailed information see BIM Employer’s Information
Requirements):
▪ Organisational Roles and Personnel;
▪ Modelling tolerances;
▪ Country’s Geographic Coordinate and height system and models’ alignment rules
and procedures;
▪ Model partitioning principles and interfaces;
▪ Rules on nomenclature of file names;
▪ Collaboration Plan and Quality Control;
▪ Detailed BIM design delivery schedule including BIM-specific activities and
milestones;
• BIM coordination meetings;
• Data Sharing;
• Level of Development;
• 2D CAD documents and drawing production;
• Simulations;
• Consistency control;
• Visualizations;
• Classification system.
1.10.5. In the inception report the Consultant shall provide a full BEP according to the requirements set
in Design Guidelines.
1.10.6. All CAD standards and requirements will be defined in the “Detailed BIM Strategy” and shall form
a part of Design Guidelines “Building Information Management (BIM) Employer’s Information
Requirements”. These CAD Standards, as minimum, will define the following and the Consultant
shall fully take into account all the CAD standards and requirements defined in the Detailed BIM
Strategy:
• Drawing and Model referencing procedures;
• Exchange and revision procedures;
• Line-types;
• Text and Dimensioning;
• Annotations;
• Layers/Levels;
• Drawing Templates.
1.10.7. The Consultant shall ensure the sufficient capacity of hardware necessary to ensure the smooth
collaboration and work progress with large federated (with many design disciplines) BIM models
might.
- 14 / 52 -
1.10.8. The Client shall ensure the necessary training for the Consultant’s personnel working with CDE
and other workflows. The Consultant shall be responsible for the participation of the required
personnel in these trainings. A training material for usage of CDE is a part of the deliverables
included in the "Detailed BIM Strategy" delivery.
- 15 / 52 -
2. SCOPE OF THE SERVICES
2.1. Main tasks
2.1.1. In accordance to the Country’s national legislation and Rail Baltica Global project requirements,
the Consultant shall perform all necessary tasks to provide the Services and to get approval of
the deliverables of the Design Services. The main tasks part of the scope of the Services of the
Consultant are as follows:
a) review and analyse all references necessary for the provision of services under the
Agreement;
b) develop and improve solutions provided in the Preliminary design and CPTD through Value
Engineering;
c) undertake necessary site investigations, including topographic, geology, hydrology, etc.;
d) carry out accredited laboratory tests for the quality check of mineral materials (in
accordance with the requirements in Design Guidelines) from local quarries to be used in
substructures;
e) analyse existing data on archeologic, cultural heritage objects and implement necessary
investigations;
f) obtain any permits required to start, implement and complete the design process;
g) proactively apply for any information from Client, and to cooperate with him, in order to
implement this information in the deliverables of the Design Services;
h) apply for technical conditions from Affected parties and implement the received
requirements that fall under the concept of Rail Baltica Global project;
i) obtain any required approvals (from Client, National Safety Authority, Notified Body
(hereinafter – NoBo), Affected parties, etc.) required during the design process;
j) apply for the necessary number of Building Permits (considering the indicative amount of
Construction Objects specified in this Technical specification) by ensuring the provision
necessary design data in accordance with Country’s construction legislation;
k) obtain necessary number of Building Permits, including permits for cultural heritage
objects, in accordance with Country’s construction and other national legislation by
implementing requirements received from involved Country’s state institutions during the
Building Permits’ issuing process;
l) cooperate with NoBo, design expertise providers in order to implement their comments
and receive their acceptance for the design;
m) ensure the coordination of provision of the Design Services (including, inter alia, any
required interdisciplinary design checks) with Implementing bodies, Affected parties and
any other state, private entities, persons involved in the design process;
n) prepare Master design (including cultural heritage objects) and Detailed Technical Design
fit for purpose;
o) implement EIA and all relevant mandatory procedures, including approvals’/permissions’
obtainment;
p) in case of deforestation, harvesting, transplantation or other removal of existing forest,
protected trees and shrubs is needed to be foreseen in order to implement construction
and installation works later – to prepare mandatory documents, perform all relevant
mandatory procedures, including approvals’ and permissions’ obtainment;
q) carry out public consultations and presentations on different aspects of technical solutions,
environmental impact assessments and further development approaches;
r) prepare Bill of Quantities and cost expenditure (construction cost estimation) calculations
for each Construction object;
- 16 / 52 -
s) provide the Design Supervision Services, including cultural heritage objects’ design
(reconstruction) supervision, during the construction in accordance to the Country’s
national legislation and Agreement’s conditions;
t) prepare maintenance requirements and manuals for the designed objects. Maintenance
manuals shall consider the most optimum ways of maintaining the infrastructure objects
with regards to, inter alia, safety, ease and speed of maintenance;
u) provide any other Services required in accordance with applicable national and
international legislation, as well as requirements falling under the Global project concept
that may be required and expected from a responsible and prudent Consultant for the
purposes of;
v) investigate the possibly contaminated areas and prepare the technology (to be applied
during the construction) for the disposal / utilisation of hazard substances;
w) be available for regular liaison as and when required with the Client and Affected parties as
may be required for the successful completion of the Services;
2.1.2. Consultant for the bearing capacity calculations shall consider the loads of all constructions,
regardless their level of detalisation in Master design or Detailed Technical design. All bridges,
overpasses, eco-ducts, tunnels, culverts, segregated grade crossings, railway substructure and
superstructure shall be designed with the consideration and calculations of all the impacts and
all the loads, including the locations of the future loads of the catenary poles, lighting poles,
GSM-R towers, substations, noise barriers, retaining walls, signals, landscaping and other objects.
2.1.3. The Consultant shall be responsible at its own cost for the correction and resubmission for the
confirmation/approval process (if necessary) at any stage of provision of the Design Services in
case of design mistakes and/or noncompliance with Technical specification, Rail Baltica Design
Guidelines, Country’s construction legislation or other mandatory requirements.
2.1.4. The Consultant shall prepare land acquisition plan (if necessary for the approved design option)
consisting of layouts, drawings, cadastral information and explanatory note on territories, which
need to be obtained for railway alignment objects as well as for access roads with cadastral unit
markings, boundaries and surface data.
2.1.5. Separately for every Design priority section the Consultant shall prepare the construction
technology and work organisation planning covering construction phasing (calendar planning),
general layout of construction works, site preparation requirements, the labour protection and
health protection plan, explanatory description, assembly load schemes, traffic organisation plan
construction technologies to be used, logistics and construction works organisation, additional
land plots necessary. Construction technology and work organisation planning shall be
developed in accordance with Country’s legal acts. The Consultant must prepare a design by
assessing the requirements of the Preliminary design for the preparation of construction sites,
warehouses for the construction of materials, waste management, construction equipment and
vehicles used for construction. The detalisation level of construction technology and work
organisation plan in Master design and Detailed technical design shall be agreed with the Client.
2.1.6. The Consultant shall analyse all the requirements for design and works mentioned in the
Preliminary design, prepare, submit all necessary applications and fulfil the Design Services in
accordance with additionally obtained requirements and conditions.
2.1.7. The Consultant shall consider the design solutions having as low as possible negative impact on
the capacity as well as operation of the existing railway infrastructure during and after the
construction. The design solutions (as well as construction technology solutions) influencing the
capacity of any public infrastructure shall be aligned with the corresponding Affected parties.
2.1.8. The Consultant shall be responsible for undertaking all the Services required and that can be
reasonably expected from an experienced and prudent design contractor for similar Services.
- 17 / 52 -
2.1.9. The Scope of Services described in the Technical Specifications are minimum and the Consultant
shall foresee the required input information for the Services (including evaluation and design
work on alternatives/options) and to design the best selected alternative with all the respective
approvals.
2.2. Country specific scope of the Design Services
2.2.1. Strategic Environmental Assessment (further on SEA) of the Rail Baltica Estonian alignment has
been carried out during county-wide spatial planning process throughout the Rail Baltica route
in Estonia (including current section). Due to the preliminary design process of the Rail Baltica
railway alignment was carried out in parallel. SEA has been developed in detalisation level of EIA
and it has been coordinated with all relevant stakeholders and has been approved by the Ministry
of the Environment.
2.2.2. The Consultant is responsible in carrying out environmental impact assessment of current Design
Section as follows:
a) The Consultant shall investigate the influence of Value Engineering design options based
on Strategic Environment Assessment document. Register of discovered environmental
issues and influenced objects and mitigation measures of preliminary design are listed in
SEA report (annex 3.5) and in preliminary design documentation (annexes 3.1- 3.4).
b) During Master design preparation stage (after the exact location of the railway alignment
has been determined) Consultant shall conduct the preliminary environmental impact
assessment according to § 61 of the Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental
Management System Act, which explains the necessity for assessing environmental impact
and is the basis for initiating or not initiating an environmental impact assessment. Based
on results of preliminary environmental impact assessment, which allows to assess all
relevant impacts accompanying with the design solution, Consultant shall develop
environmental impact assessment if required by environmental authorities.
c) The Consultant shall ensure that the environmental impact assessment is conducted by a
natural person, who holds a licence for an environmental impact assessment, or a legal
person through an employee holding a relevant licence (in the sense of §14 of the
Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Management System Act).
2.2.3. The Consultant shall follow the guidelines to design technical solutions to avoid conflicts
between traffic flow and animals: „Loomad ja liiklus Eestis. Käsiraamat konfliktide määramiseks
ja tehnilised lahendused meetmete rakendamiseks” – Estonian Road Administration, 2010
(https://www.mnt.ee/sites/default/files/elfinder/article_files/1286480217.pdf ) .
2.2.4. After the Master Design has been approved by the Client, it is the Consultant´s responsibility to
mark down physically in nature all forested areas which will need to be cut under the
responsibility of the Client before the construction works start. The Consultant shall submit a
report with the relevant map, coordinates and legend to the Client digitally.
2.2.5. The Consultant´s responsibilities with the Land Acquisition Plan are as follows:
a) Detailed land acquisition plan is to be created for railway alignment objects as well as for
access roads and other related infrastructure objects.
b) Acquisition plan is to be drawn up in accordance with §33 of the Minister of Economic
Affairs and Infrastructure directive No. 82 “Requirements to the road design project”
adopted on 02.07.2015.
c) In Land Acquisition plan the Consultant shall provide detailed drawings and explanatory
note on territories, which need to be obtained for railway with cadastral unit markings,
boundaries and surface.
- 18 / 52 -
2.2.6. It is planned that the land acquisition process for the land plots Rail Baltica railway corridor
covered by the unchanged sections of Preliminary design alignment shall begin at the end of
2018. It is planned that the land acquisition process of the remaining land plots (based on Master
Design alignment solutions) shall begin at the end of 2019.
2.2.7. The Consultant shall not be responsible for the land acquisition process. However, the Consultant
shall exercise its best efforts to ensure that Design development progresses without any delay
in accordance with the agreed time schedule. In case the land acquisition process causes any
restrictions to the Consultant in progressing the Design further for any particular case and such
restrictions cannot be avoided and/or reasonably overcome, the Consultant shall prove that
there are no other possibilities to continue progressing with Design development but wait for
the completion of land acquisition process.
2.2.8. The Consultant shall develop demolition design and obtain demolition permit for objects and
structures required to be demolished and removed.
2.2.9. In parallel to the Agreement there are ongoing surveys (in addition to those mentioned in section
1.7.1.) ordered by National Implementing Body regarding newly discovered flora species in the
special plan of Rail Baltica railway corridor. The Consultant shall consider the results of these
studies during provision of the Design Services.
2.2.10. In case the design solution of Consultant stretches out of area that is reserved for Rail Baltica
corridor according to existing county plans (i.e. crossing road viaduct with access road is longer
than 350 meters and requires extra conditions), it is Consultant´s responsibility to obtain
necessary designing conditions for the particular land plot.
2.3. Main objects
2.3.1. The main objects, inter alia, falling under the Consultant’s scope of Services that must be fully
addressed in the Design are as follows:
a) earthworks (including non-usable material storage places), embankment, cutting,
subgrade, blanket layer (sub-ballast);
b) railway superstructure, i.e. railway tracks covering turnouts, ballast, rails, concrete
sleepers/beamers with the fastenings (slab track structures);
c) station tracks, platforms, depot and multimodal access track connections (if required),
passing loops and crossovers;
d) drainages, ditches, culverts;
e) bridges, tunnels (e.g. railway, road, pedestrian, animal etc.), road viaducts, railway viaducts,
retaining walls access roads for Railway infrastructure objects, maintenance roads, eco-
ducts (animal crossovers), segregated grade pedestrian crossings,
f) cable channels (with the required spare capacity) for the main signalling, communication
cables, cable ducts to the turnout point machines, axle counters and signals, passenger
platforms with the access walkaways/equipment and cable ducts, power supply substation
land plot layouts,
g) additional cable channels for the future communication needs,
h) all structures for PRM, fences with access gates, noise barriers, separation walls and
structures for different infrastructures,
i) landscaping for the railway right of way, designed structures and objects of the Affected
parties, designed roads and road bridges etc.
- 19 / 52 -
j) location of catenary constructions, lighting poles, radiocommunication towers, substations,
signals, facilities (including buildings) for signalling equipment and other objects if
applicable,
k) railway station infrastructure (supply utilities, power supply, lighting, communication,
drainage, water supply, car parking place etc.) at the Conceptual design level for
international stations and regional stations, stops (at the Conceptual design level);
l) demolishing buildings and other structure (including utilities).
m) Temporary buildings, structures, access roads and bypasses foreseen for the
implementation of the design solutions,
n) Deforestation of land plots and trees,
o) Design for construction site cleaning before and after construction works,
p) Fire protection strips according to country specific requirements,
q) Embankment settlement and frost heave monitoring systems in locations of particular
interest,
r) Bridge/overpass/viaduct/tunnel monitoring systems,
s) Reallocation of buildings, structures and objects,
t) Design for a land melioration where needed.
2.3.2. Unless it is required specifically, the following objects shall be designed by the Consultant at the
Conceptual design level:
a) Technical buildings necessary for the railway operations and maintenance;
b) Traction power substations, overhead contact line system.
2.3.3. The list of main objects defined in the 2.3.1 is indicative on the basis of existing studies. The
Consultant remains fully responsible of establishing the list of objects and exact amount/volume
of the structures to be designed, in order to ensure the overall performance of the Services
2.4. Client’s responsibility
2.4.1. Any work done prior to the approval of Consultant’s documents by the Client shall be at the
Consultant’s risk and responsibility. The Client shall have the right to amend the Client’s
Requirements, request any additional details and to require the Consultant to make any changes
in the required Services pursuant to the provisions and procedure specified in the Particular
conditions and the Design Guidelines. Such amendments to the Client’s Requirements, including
changes in the required Services, shall not cause any additional costs to the Client unless such
costs are unavoidable.
2.4.2. Approval of any of the Consultant’s documents by the Client shall not relieve the Consultant of
the responsibility to meet all of the requirements or of the responsibility for the correction of
the documents furnished by the Consultant. The Consultant shall have no claims for additional
costs or extension of time on account of delays due to revisions of the documents, which may
be necessary for ensuring compliance with the Agreement or the applicable law. In the case of
the later discovery of errors, omission, or inconsistencies within a Consultant’s document, the
Consultant shall promptly submit the revised document, to the Client’s approval within 30 (thirty)
days after date of notification. Pursuant to the provisions and procedure specified in the
Particular conditions and the Design Guidelines the Client shall have the right to require the
Consultant to make any changes in the approved Consultant’s documents and other performed
Services.
- 20 / 52 -
2.5. Design priority sections
2.5.1. In order to ensure proper planning and management of design process, the whole Design
Section covered under the scope of the Design Services is split into the Design Priority Sections
that are prioritised from the design process and construction implementation perspective. The
range of a particular Design Priority Section is identified in the Technical Specification. In case it
is not possible to perform the Services in relation to a given Design Priority Section the Client
has the right to change the order of Design Priority Sections. If such changes are not made, the
Consultant shall consult the Client on regular basis and prioritise the performance of the Services
in the subsequent Design Priority Section.
2.5.2. The following Design Priority Sections are identified in Technical specification, which the
Consultant shall follow:
Id. No. Priority Title Range (Preliminary Notes
design)
RBDTD-EE-DS1DPS1 I Kohila Km 8+000 until km Kohila municipality
17+400 of Section 7
RBDTD-EE-DS1DPS2 II Alu-Mälivere Km 0+000 until km Rapla municipality
8+000 of Section 7;
km 12+600 until km
18+700 of Section 6
RBDTD-EE-DS1DPS3 III Kärpla -Alu Km 0+000 until km Rapla municipality
12+600 of Section 6;
Kehtna municipality
km 14+000 until
18+600 of Section 5
RBDTD-EE-DS1DPS4 IV Selja-Kärpla Km 0+000 until km Rapla municipality
14+000 of section 5
Kehtna municipality
RBDTD-EE-DS1DPS5 V Tootsi-Selja Km 15+000 until km Põhja-Pärnumaa
30+800 of section 4 municipality
2.6. Construction objects
2.6.1. The indicative list with minimal amount of Construction Objects is shown in this chapter in order
for the Consultant to understand its needs for the necessary resources and appropriate time
planning within the scope of provision of the Design Services to ensure full design packages
(covering the corresponding approvals and issuing of Building permits in accordance with
Country’s construction legislation) are prepared for every Construction Object.
2.6.2. The arrangement and split of objects (to be designed under the Agreement) into the
Construction Objects shall be done in accordance with the following:
a) Country’s national construction legislation;
b) financial resources allocation for the implementation of design (construction) activities;
- 21 / 52 -
c) Consultant’s experience and best practices of high speed railway design;
d) better coordination and management of the Design Services;
e) analysis of technical options and results of Value Engineering process;
f) envisaged ownership of the designed and build constructions;
g) Technical conditions received from Affected parties.
2.6.3. The Consultant shall note that due to the above-mentioned reasons, the final number and list of
Construction Objects might change during the Design Services.
2.6.4. The Consultant shall prepare an implementation schedule of design of Construction object
within Design Priority Section and submit it for approval. This implementation schedule shall be
updated monthly and included in Progress report. The Client may change the priorities for design
of Construction objects.
2.6.5. The following table shows the indicative list of Construction Objects based on Preliminary Design
solutions which the Consultant shall take into account in the development of the Design (and
liaise with the Client regarding any necessary changes identified):
No. Design priority Title Location4 (range),
section km
RBDTD-LV-DS1DPS1 Design Priority Section No. 1 Km 8+000 until km
17+400 of Section
7
1. Kohila station5 Km 13+100 – km
13+600 of section 7
2. Rail Baltica railway line section Kohila km 13+600 – km
station – Harju county 17+400 of section 7
3. Number of Viaducts 6
4. Number of Ecoducts 2
5. Number of Culverts 17
RBDTD-EE-DS1DPS2 Design Priority Section No. 2 km 12+600 until
km 18+700 of
Section 6;
Km 0+000 until km
8+000 of Section
7.
6. Rail Baltica railway line section Rapla Km 12+100 until km
station – Kohila station 18+700 of section 6;
4
Based on Preliminary design coordinates that might be changed to consolidate the coordinate system for
the Rail Baltica Global project
5
Based on CPTD recommendation
- 22 / 52 -
No. Design priority Title Location4 (range),
section km
km 0+00 until km
12+100 of section 7.
7. Number of Viaducts 7
8. Number of Ecoducts 2
9. Number of Culverts 13
RBDTD-EE-DS1DPS3 Design Priority Section No. 3 Km 14+000 until
18+600 of Section
5;
Km 0+000 until km
12+600 of Section
6
10. Rapla station Km 10+800 until km
12+100 of Section 6
11. Number of Bridges/Viaducts 8
12. Number of Ecoducts 0
13. Number of Culverts 18
RBDTD-EE-DS1DPS4 Design Priority Section No. 4 Km 0+000 until km
14+000 of section
5
14. Rail Baltica railway line section Km 6+500 until
Järvakandi station – Rapla station 18+600 of section 5;
km 0+00 until
10+800 of section 6
15. Järvakandi station Km 4+700 until km
6+500 of section 5
16. Number of Viaducts 4
17. Number of Ecoducts 2
18. Number of Culverts 17
RBDTD-EE-DS1DPS5 Design Priority Section No. 5 Km 15+000 until
km 30+800 of
Section 4
19. Rail Baltica railway line section 15+000 Km 15+000 until km
– Kaisma station 27+000 of Section 4
- 23 / 52 -
No. Design priority Title Location4 (range),
section km
20. Kaisma station 6 Km 27+000 until
27+500 of section 4
21. Rail Baltica railway line section Kaisma Km 27+500 until km
station until Järvakandi station 30+800 of section 4;
km 0+00 until km
4+700 of section 5
22. Number of Viaducts 2
23. Number of Ecoducts 3
24. Number of Culverts 27
25. In all priority sections Local access roads TBD7
2.7. Design expertise and Conformity assessment
2.7.1. Conformity assessment of subsystems and interoperability constituents will be in accordance
Directive 2008/57/EC and Directive 2016/797/EU to ensure interoperability between the Rail
Baltica Global project and the European railway network (NoBo assessement). NoBo assessment
starts with design works phase and ends with formal certification of each separate completed
railway subsystem.
2.7.2. Design expertise as well as NoBo assessment are under the responsibility of the Client. The
Consultant shall cooperate with the design expertise as well as NoBo assessment with the Client
and provide all necessary data. The Consultant shall implement the comments (correct the
design documents) received from design expertise as well as NoBo assessment service providers
within 1 week of receival of such comments.
2.8. Building Permits’ receival process
2.8.1. The Consultant shall carry out all necessary activities at its own cost to obtain necessary Building
Permits for all Construction Objects according to the Country’s national construction legislation.
2.8.1.1 Building Permits for following parts of design are descoped from the Consultant’s
responsibilities:
• DPS1 BP11 and BP12;
• DPS2 BP04 and BP05 – BR1645.
2.8.2. The Consultant shall fully take into account the time periods specified in Country’s construction
legislation for the Building Permits receipt process.
6
Based on CPTD recommendation
7
According to Master Design solution
- 24 / 52 -
2.8.3. The Consultant shall be responsible for the applications to receive the Building Permits and
provision of necessary information. The Client shall confirm every application of the Building
Permit/MBP.
2.8.4. Application for all Building Permits related to Rail Baltica projects shall be submitted
electronically through the Estonian Register of construction works (“Ehitisregister” in Estonian)
which is coordinated by the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communication of the Republic of
Estonia.
2.8.5. Supplementary information on the structure and guidelines on how to form building permit
documents are available online - Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communication
“Requirements to form documents in applying building permit electronically”.
2.8.6. Tabulated overview of the obligation to submit the building notice or building design
documentation and to apply for building permit is presented in annex No. 1 of the Estonian
Building Code. Building permits for railway design projects need to be applied and obtained
according to the structure of the referred annex.
2.8.7. The authority to issue building permits for the Rail Baltica project in Estonia is the Estonian
Technical Regulatory Authority (“Tehnilise Järelevalve Amet” in Estonian).
2.8.8. On behalf of the Client the Consultant shall be responsible to communicate and inform the
affected land owners, neighbours and other groups of people of the commencement of the
design process / receipt of the construction permit as required by the construction legislation.
2.9. Affected parties’ objects
2.9.1. The Consultant shall be responsible for the coordination of activities of the Design Services with
Affected parties within and/or in association with the Scope of the Services.
2.9.2. Based on the requirements specified in Preliminary Design, CPTD and following the design
solution development process the Consultant shall apply for Technical Conditions from Affected
parties (hereinafter – Affected party Technical Conditions).
2.9.3. The scope of Affected party Technical Conditions might cover the following construction
activities that shall be incorporated in the design by the Consultant during provision of the
Design Services:
a) Reconstruction, demolition, upgrade;
b) Relocation, protection, restoration, preservation;
c) any other construction activities in line with Rail Baltica Global project objectives.
2.9.4. The Consultant shall coordinate and align the scope of Affected party Technical Conditions
before the application and after the receipt with the Client to ensure that Technical Conditions
are legitimate and in line with Rail Baltica Global project.
2.9.5. The Consultant shall be responsible for the implementation of the requirements of Affected party
Technical Conditions during the provision of the Design Services.
2.9.6. The Consultant shall be responsible for the implementation, update and transfer to the Client of
the database of technical conditions, correspondence and any other document related to the
requirements of Affected party management.
2.9.7. The indicative list of Affected parties is as follows:
a) Transport infrastructure operators/owners: railways, roads, airports;
b) Power transmission operators (high voltage) and power suppliers (low and medium
voltage);
- 25 / 52 -
c) Oil/gas transmission operators;
d) State/municipal institutions;
e) Landowners;
f) State Forest Service;
g) Telecom (communication cable lines, mobile operators)
h) Fire/Rescue services and military authorities;
i) Private enterprises;
j) Railway authorities;
k) State/municipal service companies (water supply, heat supply etc.);
l) Environmental monitoring institutions;
m) Culture heritage monitoring institutions;
n) Melioration and land drainage authorities and owners;
o) any other institution the requirements thereof shall be considered by the Consultant during
the Design Services provision.
3. DESIGN PROCESS
3.1. Site Investigation
3.1.1. The Consultant shall carry out all the necessary site investigations/surveys – inter alia, geodetic
and topography, geological, geotechnical and hydro-geology, hydrology, noise, EIA if applicable
and any other investigations necessary to receive responsible authorities/institution approvals
(result registrations) in accordance with Country’s applicable legislation, regulations, standards
and other requirements covered in the Technical Specification, Design Guidelines and Rail Baltica
- Additional requirements for site investigations (Annex No. 5).
3.1.2. For the site investigations the Consultant shall prepare program for each investigation, receive
all the necessary and applicable permissions (from the Client, state authorities and other) to carry
out the respective site investigations and at the end of investigation shall prepare report for each
investigation.
3.2. Value engineering
3.2.1. Value Engineering process
3.2.1.1 The Consultant shall implement Value Engineering process by applying the best
engineering practise to optimise the design solutions and achieve the best value for
money through railway lifecycle by ensuring safety, railway system capacity, operational
efficiency, reliability and flexibility, social, economic, environmental as well as other
objectives defined at intergovernmental level between Baltic states for the Rail Baltica
railway.
3.2.1.2 The Consultant shall consider all reference data defined in the Technical specification, as
well as relevant results of site investigations implemented by the Consultant during
provision of the Design Services and other necessary data.
3.2.1.3 For every railway line structural aspect (such as horizontal and vertical alignment,
embankment structure, bridge, viaduct, roads, eco-duct, noise barrier etc.) the Consultant
shall develop different feasible design options based on the following:
- 26 / 52 -
a) Preliminary design solutions;
b) CPTD recommendations;
c) Additional option developed by Consultant’s by considering the best engineering
practice;
3.2.1.4 The level of detalisation for every design option, to be proposed by the Consultant, shall
be sufficiently clear to understand at the Conceptual design level and sufficiently detailed
for the exhaustive analysis throughout the Value Engineering process. The Consultant
shall present every design option by providing the following information:
a) Conceptual design (showing alignment, cross-sections, maps, interfaces with other
objects, landscaping etc.);
b) CAPEX, OPEX calculations;
c) Quantitive and qualitive analysis of advantages and disadvantages of particular
option;
d) Any other data necessary to identify the key aspects differentiating the design
options to be compared.
3.2.1.5 The Consultant shall ensure that Value Engineering results are aligned with the design
solutions planned for the neighbouring Rail Baltica railway sections (at least for 1 km)
outside the Design section.
3.2.1.6 The results of Value Engineering process are Conceptual design solutions agreed and
approved by the Client and involved Beneficiaries to be used as a basis for further
development and preparation of the Master design.
3.2.2. Scope of Value Engineering and approval
The Consultant shall implement Value Engineering separately for every Design priority section
and prepare Value Engineering report consisting of two main parts.
I. Value Engineering for railway alignment, covering vertical and horizontal railway profiles,
as well as railway / road viaducts;
II. Value Engineering for structures, covering railway embankment structure, bridges, viaducts,
tunnels, eco-ducts, noise barriers and other structures (justified as necessary to be analysed
through Value Engineering process)
3.2.3. Value Engineering for railway alignment
3.2.3.1 The Consultant shall implement Value Engineering for railway alignment, in order to
improve technical solutions for the insertion of the railway infrastructure in its
environment, and to optimise cost/benefit ratio. The Value Engineering methodology
shall follow the following prioritized criteria:
a) Safety and Security;
b) User's perspective (passengers, freight owners);
c) Train operator's perspective (capacity, rolling stock, energy costs, OPEX, revenues);
d) Infrastructure management (traffic management, maintenance management, OPEX)
;
e) Technical and project delivery (CAPEX, third parties, schedule, procedures);
f) Externalities (human health and society, environment impact, network effect, etc.).
3.2.3.2 The Consultant shall implement Value Engineering for railway alignment at least for two
options in accordance with Value Engineering methodology provided in Annex No. 4 of
- 27 / 52 -
Technical specifications. Based on the best practical implementation of Value Engineering
exercise, the Consultant might propose modifications (to be accepted by the Client) to
the Value Engineering methodology provided in Annex No. 4.
3.2.3.3 The reports of Value Engineering for railway alignment shall be prepared in consultation
with the Client, Beneficiaries, Implementing Bodies as well as relevant Affected parties
and approved by the Client.
3.2.3.4 The Consultant shall be responsible for the presentation of the results of Value
Engineering process not only to the Client, but also to the involved Beneficiaries,
Implementing Bodies and Affected parties.
3.2.3.5 The Consultant shall be responsible for the study of options according the criteria defined
in the Value Engineering methodology, and to prepare the necessary technical drawings,
calculations and other elements. By exception, the Client will manage the study of the
following criteria:
• User perspective (C3 to C5),
• Train Operator Perspective (C6 to C10),
on the basis of elements and drawings provided by the Consultant. Study reports for these
criteria will be transferred to the Consultant, in order he could assembly and finalise the
Value Engineering report.
3.2.3.6 During the implementation of the Value Engineering the Consultant shall assume the
following split for the total length of the Design Sections:
- changes resulting in significant horizontal and vertical railway alignment
improvement within the county-wide spatial plan railway corridor - approximately
40%
- changes resulting in insignificant horizontal alignment improvement, but significant
vertical alignment improvement within the county-wide spatial plan railway corridor
- approximately 60%
This provided information is based on the Client’s available data, understanding and
studies, which may improve during design.
3.2.4. Value Engineering for structures
3.2.4.1 The Consultant shall implement Value Engineering for structures by analysing at least two
new design options separately for every embankment structures, bridge, viaducts, tunnel,
eco-duct, noise barrier and other structures. The following data shall be provided and
compared for the analysis of these options:
a) CAPEX, OPEX, life cycle costs;
b) Lifetime;
c) Maintenance program with conditions;
d) Any other data necessary for comparison analysis of different options (for example,
monitoring systems for bridges, embankments etc.).
3.2.4.2 The reports of Value Engineering for structures shall be prepared in consultation with the
Client as well as relevant Affected parties and approved by the Client.
3.2.5. Value Engineering of embankment structure
3.2.5.1 The Consultant shall propose different design options for railway embankment structure
by considering the availability of local mineral materials (including its properties
parameters) to be used for railway embankment construction, as well as ground water
level, water drainage conditions, existing land melioration conditions etc.
- 28 / 52 -
3.2.5.2 Consultant shall carry out laboratory tests according to requirements described in Annex
No. 5, according to standards listed in Design Guidelines, from locally available quarries
within 50-60 km distance from the railway line. In case the laboratory test results would
show insufficient amount and quality of required mineral materials, then the Consultant
shall carry out laboratory tests according to the requirements described in Annex No. 5
and according to standards listed in Design Guidelines requirements, from local quarries
within 100-120 km distance from the railway line or in greater distance if the total cost of
material and transportation is competitive.
3.2.5.3 Consultant shall propose different embankment design options for geotechnically similar
railway line sections from local quarries. Options should be designed by using only
available local mineral materials and general requirements from Design Guidelines.
Options are as follows:
▪ Technical individual solution using local material in radius up to 50-60 km.
▪ Technical individual solution using local material in radius up to 100-120 km.
▪ Technical solution using imported material according Design Guidelines material
requirements and cross sections (including potential recyclable materials).
3.2.5.4 Consultant shall carry out substructure bearing capacity calculations and submit proposal
of possibility to achieve the requirements set out in the Design Guidelines, railway
substructure by increasing the thicknesses of earthwork layers using available local
mineral materials.
3.2.5.5 Consultant shall study and consider of possibility to use different stabilisation methods
for mineral materials to fulfil the required parameters set out in the Design Guidelines.
3.2.5.6 Consultant shall work out 3 possible design options for marshlands areas if unsuitable
material depth is more than 3 meters. Options are as follows:
• Individual design with Geosynthetics
• Other individual design according compressible soil area requirements
• Replace unsuitable materials
3.2.5.7 Consultant shall secure safe track during 100 years with required bearing capacity and
without frost heave.
3.2.5.8 The Consultant shall consider the results of the studies for mineral materials implemented
in the Country.
3.2.6. Value Engineering for eco-ducts
3.2.6.1 Consultant shall design eco-ducts according to Eurocodes and based on Country’s legal
requirements. If requirements are missing, then the minimum requirements are the
following:
• If planned traffic is missing, then minimum calculated vehicle load should be 600 kN
(for emergency situation) and axle load 150 kN;
• If local traffic will pass eco-duct then calculated vehicle load should be 1200 kN, and
axle load 150 kN.
3.2.6.2 Eco-duct calculated lifetime should be 100 years.
3.2.7. Value Engineering for noise barriers
3.2.7.1 Consultant shall design noise barriers according noise studies, calculations (including
noise 3D model) and legal acts.
3.2.7.2 Consultant shall prepare Analysis of land demand (including land area necessary to
maintain the noise barriers);
- 29 / 52 -
3.2.7.3 When choosing the type of noise barrier, excess material not suitable for railway
construction or recycled materials that reduce noise to the level required by law, should
be used as much as possible.
3.2.7.4 The Consultant shall offer 3 solutions for each noise barrier wall with visual drafts, 2 of
which are made with recyclable material and one solution, which is the most effective
solution in the opinion of the Consultant.
3.2.8. Value Engineering report review / approval
3.2.8.1 The review / approval process of Value Engineering reports for railway alignment
provided to the Client shall take up to 45 (forty five) days. The Client shall prepare the
technical review report and arrange necessary agreements with Beneficiaries,
Implementing bodies and relevant Affected parties.
3.2.8.2 The review / approval process of Value Engineering reports for structures provided to the
Client shall take up to 10 (ten) days. The Client shall prepare the technical review report.
3.2.8.3 The technical review approval report has three options:
a) confirming that the report is compliant and Master Design stage with preferred
option can be started with additional recommendations of Client;
b) confirming that the report is compliant and Master Design stage with preferred
option can be started with no additional recommendations of Client;
c) defining the value engineering report as non-compliant and requiring resubmission
of the report.
3.3. Master Design structure
3.3.1.1 The first major deliverable for the Design process is the Master Design. The Master Design
contains all technical parts of the design and consists of technical description, drawings,
calculation notes and cost estimate. Detail solutions shall be worked out on the level that
Client could analyse the construction budget. The purpose of the Master Design is to
determine and ensure the Client and the Consultant of the principal outcome of the
Detailed Technical Design. No major changes are expected after the approved Master
Design barring exceptional circumstances.
3.3.1.2 The technical solutions defined in the Master Design shall provide sufficient and clear
detail of the project scope for the appropriate authorities to evaluate the interoperability,
safety, environmental aspects, rationality and technical performance of the railway and
related facilities to approve the project.
3.3.1.3 The technical requirements for the Master Design are as follows:
1. Prepared technical solutions for the section of Rail Baltica infrastructure, including
typical drawings for the railway line and relevant cross-sections, (including
electrification, control, command and signalling (CCS) and communications systems,
stops,) stations and civil structures – road crossings, river crossings and culverts,
pedestrian and animal crossings, utility crossings, landscape design, noise reduction
solutions, fencing, etc.
2. All necessary investigations complete.
3. All existing utilities and their connections need to be shown in the design with
information of the owner of each specific utility.
4. Prepare detailed technical drawings with a detailing level corresponding to a master
design – general, but precise enough so that the main details and the main
requirements for precise detailing in further design works process are clear.
- 30 / 52 -
5. Prepare the necessary crossing schematic drawings according to the requirements
for multi-level crossings, ensuring a safe and comfortable crossing of the railway
track. Solutions must be created in consultation with respective Affected parties.
6. Design the plans and longitudinal profiles of the proposed crossings to a detailing
level that would provide enough input information for the civil designs and work
estimation.
7. Based on the input of as the Client, show the electric sub-station locations for the
railway.
8. Design railway bridges together with catenary post, grounding and signalling and
catenary cable channels according requirements in Design Guidelines.
9. Prepare cost estimate with a detailed split for infrastructure elements, types of work,
sections of railway based on required Bill of Quantities.
10. Prepare the final list of real estates and land plots with borders needed for the railway
and related civil structures. For each land plot a detailed drawing must be prepared,
indicating current land plot borders and necessary part for land acquisition, surface
area values, which takes into account local municipality rules of land division and
provision of access to the remaining land plot parts.
11. Prepare technical solutions for the railway line, including:
- Schematic track layout for the railway line including main track and side tracks,
station areas, passing loops, crossovers etc.;
- Railway line layout (horizontal alignment) (scale 1:1000) with related ditches,
roads, utilities, other structures/buildings placement and planned railway tracks;
- Railway line longitudinal profiles (vertical alignment) (vertical scale 1:200,
horizontal scale 1:5000) combined with railway line layout (scale 1:5000) on
ortophoto, utilities, ditches and geological, hydrogeological data;
- Cross-sections (scale 1:100) including superstructure, substructure, land plot
boundaries, drainage structures, ditches, cables, pipes, etc. and geological,
hydrogeological data;
- Diagram of design speed permitted according alignment parameters;
- Railway civil structure part: bridges with catenary posts and cable channels,
crossings, showing overview plan, cross section and elevation, indicating the
length of spans, used materials and dimensions of bearing structures.
- Culverts, groundwater, drainage and storm water management systems;
- Passenger platforms;
- Road and pedestrian segregated-grade crossings;
- Noise barriers and other technical solutions for reduction of noise and vibration;
- Cabling along railway line;
- Access and maintenance roads along railway line;
- Communication and utility networks, including crossings, local roads, state
roads and other affected infrastructure.
- Any additional drawings and documents according to Country’s legislation.
12. The Consultant shall provide a list of text and graphical documents, such as drawings,
sketches, plans, schemes, diagrams, etc., and propose exact appearance of these
documents for Master design to define the scope of graphical documents and
minimum level of detailing. Alternative scales may be offered. The Consultant shall
correct/improve/supplement the list and/or minimum level of detailing and get
Client’s approval. Consultant shall provide any additional graphic
materials/documents or other information if it is necessary to do according to
reasonable requirements of approving authorities.
- 31 / 52 -
13. Includes a collection of all technical conditions received and preliminary approvals
by the Affected parties that issued them.
14. BIM and LOD for Master Design are described in the BIM Employer’s Information
Requirements.
15. All power supply, catenary, signalling, ERTMS posts and cables layout without
systems based on Design Guidelines shall be designed as Conceptual design. All
loads from catenary system shall be calculated and integrated to embankment,
bridges, tunnels, viaducts and platforms load calculations.
16. All local passenger platforms with lighting (with designed network connections from
energy suppliers), pedestrian and cyclist roads, catenary posts and catenary and
signalling cable layouts with passengers’ information system facilities (without
systems) of local passenger stops shall be designed in Conceptual design level (land
plot borders shall be determined) according Detail BIM Strategy.
17. Starting point (0+00) for Master design section Pärnu-Rapla is the border of
Harjumaa and Raplamaa (endpoint of section 7 of preliminary design) and railway
distance will be counted towards Pärnu.
18. Consultant shall design all roads (access road, local road, state roads), road viaducts
and ecoducts (or animal passes) on the level on Principal Design Documentation
(põhiprojekt). Level of design requirements is based on requirements from Building
Code and Requirements for road design (1.3.7; 1.3.10; 1.3.12 above).
3.3.2. Master Design review and approval
1. The Master Design shall be submitted to Client for review.
2. During Master Design process Consultant shall provide required information to NoBo as
well as design expertise expert (to be organised separately by the Client).
3. Administrative review. After receipt of the provided Master design in a period of up to 10
(ten) days Client will carry out administrative review. The aim of the administrative review
is to check whether the Master design provided is complete. If submission is incomplete,
Client requests resubmission of the Master design in full scope.
4. Technical review. After receipt of a complete Master Design in a period of up to 45 (forty
five) days Client together with Beneficiary representatives will prepare the technical review
report.
5. When Master design has been approved by Administrative review, Client will organise
design expertise of Master design.
6. At least one review meeting with Client takes place during the review period.
7. The technical review report together with independent expertise report has following
options in Estonia:
a) Confirming that the Master design is compliant and work on Detailed Technical Design
can be started with no additional recommendations.
b) Confirming that the Master design is compliant and work on Detailed Technical Design
can be started with recommendations to be implemented. The Consultant is
responsible for implementing the recommendations in the Detailed technical design.
c) Defining the Master design as non-compliant and requiring resubmission of the
Master design.
d) When Master Design is compliant to Agreement requirements then the Consultant
shall start construction permit application process. If authorities will reject the
application, then Consultant shall improve Master design without additional cost.
3.4. Detail Technical Design structure
- 32 / 52 -
3.4.1. Designer shall design Detail Technical Design (Tööprojekt) works according Technical
requirements based on Estonian legislation described above and on the level BIM requirements
described in Detailed BIM Strategy.
3.4.2. Consultant shall design the maintenance manuals for the design constructions as a part of
Detailed Technical Design.
3.4.3. All materials and products shall be described via technical requirements and technical
characteristic.
3.5. Detail Technical Design review and approval
3.5.1. Detailed Technical Design is submitted to Client for review by the Consultant.
3.5.2. Administrative review. After receipt of the provided Detailed Technical Design in a period of up
to 10 (ten) days Client will carry out administrative review. The aim of the administrative review
is to check whether the Detailed Technical Design provided is complete. If submission is
incomplete, Client requests resubmission of the Detailed Technical Design in full scope.
3.5.3. Technical review. After receipt of a complete Detailed Technical Design in a period of up to 45
(forty five) days Client will prepare the technical review report.
3.5.4. The technical review report has two options in Estonia:
a) Confirming that the Detailed Technical Design is compliant and construction works can be
started with no additional recommendations.
b) Defining the Detailed Technical Design as non-compliant and requiring resubmission of the
Detailed Technical Design
3.5.5. The Client shall receive complete sets of approved DTD documentation in at 1 original set
(printout) for every construction permit/construction object as defined in the Technical
Specification.
3.6. Meetings
3.6.1. During provision of the Design Services, the following meetings shall be organised and
held:
Title Responsible Scheduling Participating parties (from
party organising both parties of the
the meeting Agreement)
Kick-off meeting Client 1 week after Consultant and Client project
commencement date of the management team
Agreement
Inception meeting Consultant 1 month after Consultant and Client project
commencement date of the management team and
Agreement necessary experts
Progress meetings Consultant Every 1 month following the Consultant and Client project
Inception meeting management team and
necessary experts
- 33 / 52 -
Title Responsible Scheduling Participating parties (from
party organising both parties of the
the meeting Agreement)
Technical Working Consultant Every 2 weeks Client will appoint
Group (TWG) representatives according
meetings internal rules and invite
Consultant experts according
Client needs. Client shall
inform Consultant minimum 1
week ahead. Client and
Consultant project managers
or deputies shall take part in
all meetings
BIM collaboration Consultant Every month or schedule Consultant’s and sub
meetings can be agreed separately Consultant’s specialists (if
with the Client required), representatives of
Client (if required) and
Affected party authorized
representatives (if required)
Meetings with Consultant When needed Consultant’s and Client’s
Affected parties design process managing
representatives (when
needed) and Affected party
authorized representatives
Implementing Client When needed Client and Consultant project
body and (approximately on quarterly managers or deputies shall
beneficiary basis) take part in all meetings
management
meetings
Meeting with Client When needed Consultant’s and Client’s
NoBo and design design process managing
expertise representatives
3.6.2. The minimal content to be followed during the meetings is defined in the following table:
Id. No.-Title Main content and objectives of the meeting Input data to be provided
before the meeting
RBDTD-EE- DS1-Kick- 1. Presentation of Rail Baltica Global project 1. Slides to be presented
off meeting and the general scope of the Design by the parties
Services by the Client
2. Organizational structure of the Consultant
3. Split of responsibilities at Consultants Team
4. Preliminary planning of the Design Services
activities
5. Client expectations to quality assurance plan
and BIM requirements
- 34 / 52 -
Id. No.-Title Main content and objectives of the meeting Input data to be provided
before the meeting
RBDTD-EE- DS1- 1. Presentation of Programme 1. Programme
Inception meeting 2. Scheduling of activities of the Design 2. List of key and non-key
Services experts
3. Scheduling of all meetings 3. Draft version of Progress
4. Presentation of Consultant’s Team report
5. Presentation and agreement on progress 4. BEP
reporting structure and format
RBDTD-EE- DS1- 1. Presentation of monthly progress 1. Draft version of previous
Progress meetings 2. Agreement on Progress report progress report
No. XX 3. Solving of administrative issues of 2. Administrative issues on
implementation of the Design Services implementation of the
4. Risk management Design Services
TWG meetings 1. Presentation of technical issues and 1. List of technical issues to
proposal of solutions address during the
2. Agreement on the way forward for every meeting with the
technical issue proposed solution
3. BIM collaboration issues options
2. Input data for Value
Engineering and option
analysis
3. Input data for BIM issues
Implementing body 1. Presentation of progress 1. Programme review
and beneficiary 2. Administrative issues 2. Status Presentation
management 3. Agreement on the way forward for every 3. Technical issues.
meetings technical issue
4. Risk management
RBDTD-EE- DS1- 1. Presentation of administrative and/or List of administrative and/or
Affected party technical issues related to Affected party technical issues to address
meeting No. XX and proposal of solutions during the meeting with the
2. Agreement on the way forward for every proposed solution options
administrative and/or technical issue
Meeting with NoBo 1. Presentation of design solutions, comments List of comments to address
and design expertise from NoBo or design expertise and proposal during the meeting with the
solutions proposed solution options
2. Agreement on the way forward for every
comment
3.6.3. Party responsible for the organising the meeting shall ensure the following:
a) Informing of the participants on the meeting with the request to submit agenda items and
necessary data (at least 2 weeks in advance, in case of TWG meeting at least 1 week in
advance)
b) Obtaining necessary input data for the meetings
c) Managing the agenda of the meetings including distribution of the data before the
meetings (at least 1 week in advance)
- 35 / 52 -
d) Prepared documents according agenda shall be prepared 2 (two) days before meeting and
upload to CDE
e) Leading of the meetings
f) Organising a venue for the meetings
g) Distribution of the signed minutes of the meetings and data after the meeting (at least 1
week after the meeting)
3.6.4. The Consultant shall be responsible for the preparation of minutes of all meetings where
Consultant participates during the Design process. The Consultant shall have acceptance from
the Client on the prepared minutes of the meeting.
3.6.5. The Consultant shall be responsible for the interpretation services to Country’s language of
meetings where Affected Party participates during the Design process.
3.7. Risk management
3.7.1. The Consultant shall plan in advance all its activities necessary to carry out the full scope of the
Services in due time and in the agreed quality by considering the all relevant risks and minimising
their adverse influence on costs and time schedule. Without limitation, such risks include:
- Restrictions by landowners to access the land plots for the site investigation;
- Weather conditions which may affect site investigation performance;
- Possible track realignment outside the borders of approved Rail Baltica route;
- Delays, inactivities, procastrination of the Affected parties regarding the provision of the
Services;
- BIM strategy devolpment and system implementation delays for any reason;
- Land acquisition process, Environmental impact assessment and related procedures;
- Delayed commencement of the Works and delayed Works during construction;
- Changes in the Design guidelines, the Client’s requirements and defaults of the Consultant’s
subcontractors including unavailability of human and technical resources;
- Changes in applicable laws and regulations;
- Legal actions by third parties.
3.8. Language
3.8.1. The Consultant shall prepare bilingual design documentation, i.e. in English and Country’s
language.
3.8.2. Client is not and shall not be responsible for the translation of national legislation into English
language. The Consultant shall cover the costs for the translation of national legal acts and any
other documents, if necessary for the Consultant for implementation of the Services..
3.8.3. The Consultant shall ensure the required technical, legal level of communication in English and
Country’s language.
3.8.4. List of the documents to be provided and translated:
No. Document name English language Country’s
language
Agreement implementation
- 36 / 52 -
No. Document name English language Country’s
language
1. Correspondence between Consultant and only YES NO
Client
2. Correspondence and minutes of meetings between YES YES
Consultant and Affected Parties
3. Inception, Progress, Technical Working group YES NO
(TWG), BIM collaboration meetings (agenda,
necessary data, minutes of meeting)
4. Meetings with Implementing body, Beneficiary, YES NO
NoBo, design expertise (agenda, necessary data,
minutes of meeting)
5. Inception report YES NO
5.1 Program YES NO
5.2 Quality Assurance Plan YES NO
5.3 BIM Execution plan (BEP) YES NO
6. Design progress reports YES NO
7. Design supervision progress reports YES NO
8. Final report after completion of the Design Services YES NO
9. Final report after completion of the Design YES NO
Supervision Services
10. Site investigation (per investigation) - -
10.1 Investigation Programs YES YES
10.2 Permissions YES YES
10.3 Site investigation reports YES YES
10.4 Application for approval investigation program, YES YES
reports, receiving permits
11. Value Engineering reports for railway alignment YES YES
12. Value Engineering reports for structures YES NO
13. Payment documentation YES YES
14. Presentations YES YES
Design documentation
- 37 / 52 -
No. Document name English language Country’s
language
15. Master design YES YES
16. Applications for receiving Technical conditions from YES YES
Affected parties
17. Technical conditions from Affected parties YES YES
18. Applications for building permits YES YES
19. Building permits YES YES
20. Conceptual design YES YES
21. Detail technical design YES YES
22. Construction technology and work organisation YES YES
part
23. Bill of quantities YES YES
24. Maintenance manual YES YES
25. Environmental reports YES YES
26. Land acquisition plan YES YES
27. Plans for deforestation of land plots and cutting of YES YES
trees
- all other documents not mentioned in the table shall be provided in English and Country specific
languages, unless agreed with the Client otherwise.
4. SCOPE OF DELIVERABLES
4.1.1. During provision of the Design Services, the Consultant shall prepare all deliverables necessary
for the implementation of Technical specification requirements, required to obtain the required
Construction permits for all the Construction objects and needed for the Agreement
implementation process.
4.1.2. The Consultant shall prepare all necessary deliverables within the deadlines specified in the
Agreement. The main deliverables to be provided as part of the Services, but not limited to, are
as follows:
4.2. Design deliverables
a) Site investigation reports
b) Value Engineering reports
c) Master Designs
- 38 / 52 -
d) Land acquisition plans (where necessary)
e) Conceptual design
f) Detail Technical Designs
g) BIM models, data and documents according to EIR and BEP
h) Building design in a minimum composition (MBP). Application for Construction Permits
according to national law and inquiring technical conditions.
4.3. Agreement implementation process deliverables
4.3.1. The Consultant shall be responsible for the provision of the following Agreement
implementation process deliverables:
a) Inception report
b) Programme
c) Design progress report (monthly)
d) Design Supervision progress report
e) Final report after completion of the Design Services
f) Final report after completion of the Design Supervision Services
g) Minutes of the meetings
4.4. Bill of quantities
4.4.1. A classification system for all elements and assets will be used by the Consultant in order to
deliver the Bill of quantities. The requirements for the Classification system will be described in
the Design guidelines "Building Information Management (BIM) Employer’s Information
Requirements".
4.4.2. The Bill of quantities needs to be delivered to the CDE in the required file formats. In addition,
all files shall also be delivered in Excel, Word and PDF format.
4.4.3. The Consultant shall deliver the Bill of quantities according to the requirements of each Countries
legislation, laws, rules and standards.
4.5. Visualisation of technical solutions
4.5.1. The Consultant, after agreement with the Client on the scope and content, shall prepare the
visualisation data set for every Value Engineering option and 2 visualisation data sets for every
Design priority section.
4.5.2. The Consultant shall follow the following minimal requirements and guidelines for the
preparation of the visualisation data set:
o Overview of the planned alignment and landscape situation including orthophotos;
o A flyover video of full design section shall be created showing the administrative
municipality, town and city borders including a 360-degree flyover of most interesting and
meaningful point-type construction objects;
o Detailed and realistic render of 100 m wide corridor along the track alignment axis;
o 500 m - 1 km on both sides of the track of simplified surrounding terrain including forest
areas, buildings, bodies of water (e.g. rivers or lakes), high voltage lines and other meaningful
landmarks;
- 39 / 52 -
o Designed and existing bridges, viaducts, tunnels, eco-ducts, roads and other ecosystems;
o Designed noice barriers, fences, electric cables, catenary posts, lighting equipment;
o Designed underground utilities shall be represented by using a cross section cut at several
places of the design section;
o Moving passenger and freight (where applicable) train models;
o Moving existing train and road vehicles, if applicable - In situations if the designed alignment
corridor crosses or comes near (up to 3 km from alignment axis) to the existing train or road
infrastructure;
• All the graphics, texts or numbers used in the video must align with visual identity of the project
and must be agreed with the Client;
• Technical specifications of the video:
o Resolution: 1920x1080px
o File format: *.MP4 or *.MOV (encoded using H.264 codec for the best quality/file size ratio)
o At least 25 fps
5. DESIGN SUPERVISION PROCESS
5.1.1. The Consultant shall ensure the Design Supervision Services for the Design sections with the
involvement of the experts responsible in the Design Services. The Consultant shall carry out the
Design Supervision Services for all sections /construction objects/construction permits in
accordance with Country’s construction legislation and these Technical Specifications. The
Design Supervision Services includes supervision of cultural heritage objects’ design
(reconstruction) implementation in accordance with Country’s legislation.
5.1.2. The Consultant shall provide the Design supervision reports to the Client. The Consultant shall
coordinate with the Client the decisions taken by the Consultant during the Design Supervision
Services provision. The Consultant shall agree with the Client the approval of variation orders
being issued during the construction process.
5.1.3. The Consultant is responsible for construction site visits according to the programme of the
Design Supervision Services, to ensure work and material quality standards and each
construction site survey shall be entered in the author’s supervision journal. Consultant is not
obliged to perform construction supervision according Country’s legal acts.
5.1.4. The Consultant shall attend construction work consultations and construction site meetings at
the time coordinated with the Client representatives. The meetings shall be attended by
specialists requested by Client and according implemented construction activities. It is planned
that construction site meetings will take place once per week at weekly meetings and monthly
meetings.
5.1.5. The Consultant, without request of the additional compensation, shall attend construction site
also outside normal working hours. The Client shall inform on the technical reasons of the visit.
5.1.6. The Consultant shall carry out the corrections of design errors during the course of the
construction works, without additional compensation. The Consultant undertakes to inform the
Client in writing immediately about the discovery of any deviation from the design. The
Consultant shall carry out the necessary DTD modifications and additional technical solutions
with the approval of the Client and/or Affected party and/or NoBo and/or design expertise
and/or building authority as applicable in a fastest possible manner and format, so that
construction works could progress without or minimum delays. For instance, issue
approved/signed modified DTD drawings with hand corrections or CAD standard format
drawings (DWG and DGN etc.) and then within 2 weeks’ time respectively integrate in the BIM.
The Consultant shall propose and agree the modification procedure with the Client, before start
- 40 / 52 -
of the construction works. The files shall be provided to Client in editable formats (DWG, DGN,
etc.).
5.1.7. The Consultant shall carry out changes or corrections of the MD and/or DTD without additional
compensation if the need arises due to mistake or nonconformity in the DTD or other fault or
inaction of the Consultant. In such cases the Consultant ensures repeat technical assessment of
the DTD, approvals in the state and municipal institutions, building authority (if needed) on its
own expenses and without Agreement extension.
5.1.8. The Consultant shall ensure conformity with the DTD during commissioning completed
construction works within the scope of the Designer’s responsibility.
5.1.9. The Consultant shall check building structures, technological and other equipment, construction
products and materials compliance with the DTD and the Designer shall not to allow
inappropriate building constructions, technological and other equipment, construction products
and materials utilization if those don’t comply with the DTD. Consultant shall consult Client on
current issues and, if necessary, provide additional instructions to deliver details .
5.1.10. The Consultant shall check if the DTD and as-built documentation is up-to-date.
5.1.11. Upon the request of the Client the Consultant shall arrive to the construction site as early as
possible, but latest 48 hours after the request is received.
5.1.12. The Contactor shall arrive to the construction site (or to respond to the request through the
electronic communication means, if this is possible) within 24 hours if the need arises due to
mistake or nonconformity in the DTD or other fault or inaction of the Consultant.
5.1.13. The Consultant undertakes to provide the Services carefully, in the best interests of the Client
and for the best benefit of the Client, to act during the Services on the level of generally
recognized professional skills and to prevent damage to the Client.
5.1.14. The Consultant undertakes to immediately inform the Client in writing in all substantial
circumstances related to the provision of the Services, in particular those that may induce the
Client to change the instructions given to the Client. Disclosure of performance difficulties shall
not limit the Consultant’s liability arising from this Agreement.
5.1.15. The Consultant undertakes to submit to the Client once per month written report on the content,
volume, delivery time and with the provision of the Services.
5.1.16. The Consultant shall return to the Client everything that has been received and created in during
the period of provision of the Services, as well as what Designer has received from the Client and
which he did not use for the provision of the Services. The Consultant is obliged to transfer the
documents obtained or provided during provision of the Services to the Client within 30 (thirty)
days after the necessity to work with the documents has expired.
6. CONSULTANT’S TEAM
6.1. General requirements for Consultant’s team members
6.1.1. The Consultant shall ensure the necessary availability of the following key-experts for
implementation of the Design Services:
Key-expert Main responsibilities
Project manager Management of design process at administrative level
- 41 / 52 -
Design manager Management of design process at technical level; Certified in the
relevant area of the Design Services in accordance with Country’s
legislation.
Railway track designer Technical solutions for railway tracks design; Certified in the relevant
area of the Design Services in accordance with Country’s legislation
Structural designer Technical solutions for the structural design;
Certified in the relevant area of the Design Services in accordance
with Country’s legislation
Road designer Technical solutions for the roads design;
Certified in the relevant area of the Design Services in accordance
with Country’s legislation
Railway bridge designer Technical solutions for the railway bridge design;
Certified in the relevant area of the Design Services in accordance
with Country’s legislation
Road bridge / viaduct Technical solutions for the road bridge / viaducts design;
designer Certified in the relevant area of the Design Services in accordance
with Country’s legislation
Geotechnical expert Geotechnical investigations;
Certified in the relevant area of the Design Services in accordance
with Country’s legislation
Environment expert Environmental aspects of technical solutions;
Certified in the relevant area of the Design Services in accordance
with Country’s legislation
Interface manager Technical solutions for interfaces at the following levels:
- construction level;
- railway subsystem level;
- design section level;
- Affected parties level;
- construction organisation level;
other.
6.2. Requirements for key-experts
6.2.1. The Consultant shall ensure the involvement of the required key-experts:
Key-expert No. 1: Project manager
experience as a Project manager in managing at least one completed
railway design project, covering the following:
- design is completed within the previous 10 years (year 2008, 2009, 2010,
2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018);
Project experience - 1435 mm gauge and TSI verified railway;
- design speed above 200 km/h;
- length of railway line section at least 50 km;
- value of the design contract is not less than 5 M Eur.
- 42 / 52 -
Language level English B2 Level8.
Key-expert No. 2: Design manager (Chief design manager)
Following Country’s construction legislation authorised to design railway
Professional level
tracks.
experience as a Design manager (lead designer) in at least one completed
railway design covering the following:
- design is completed within the previous 10 years (year 2008, 2009, 2010,
2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018);
Project experience
- 1435 mm gauge and TSI verified railway;
- design speed above 200 km/h;
- length of railway line section at least 30 km.
Language level English B2 Level.
Key-expert No. 3: Railway track designer
Following Country’s construction legislation authorised to design railway
Professional level
tracks
experience as Railway track designer in at least one completed railway
design covering the following:
- design is completed within the previous 10 years (year 2008, 2009, 2010,
2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018);
Project experience
- 1435 mm gauge and TSI verified railway;
- design speed above 200 km/h;
- length of railway line section longer than 30 km.
Language level English B2 Level.
Key-expert No. 4: Construction designer (Structural designer)
Following Country’s construction legislation authorised to design
Professional level
constructions and structures.
experience as Construction designer in at least one completed construction
design for public transport infrastructure project covering the following:
Project experience - within the previous 7 years (year 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017
and 2018);
- value of the design contract is larger than 0.5 M Eur.
Language level English B2 Level.
8
Language skill level is based on Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (see
http://europass.cedefop.europa.eu/resources/european-language-levels-cefr)
- 43 / 52 -
Key-expert No. 5: Road designer
Professional level Following Country’s construction legislation authorised to design roads
experience as Road designer in at least one completed highway design
project covering the following:
Project experience - design is completed within the previous 7 years (year 2011, 2012, 2013,
2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018);
- value of the design contract is larger than 0.5 M Eur.
Language level English B2 Level.
Key-expert No. 6: Railway bridge designer
Following Country’s construction legislation authorised to design railway
Professional level
bridges
experience as Railway bridge designer in at least one completed railway
bridge design, covering the following:
- design is completed within the previous 7 years (year 2011, 2012, 2013,
2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018);
Project experience
- 1435 mm gauge and TSI verified railway;
- design speed above 200 km/h;
Language level English B2 Level.
Key-expert No. 7: Road bridge / viaduct designer
Professional level Following Country’s construction legislation authorised to design bridges
experience as road bridge or viaduct designer in at least one completed
road bridge or road viaduct design covering the following:
Project experience
- design is completed within the previous 7 years (year 2011, 2012, 2013,
2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018).
Language level English B2 Level.
Key-expert No. 8: Geotechnical expert
Following Country’s construction legislation authorised (if required) to carry
Professional level
out geotechnical investigations
- 44 / 52 -
experience as Geotechnical expert in at least one completed railway design
project, covering the following:
- design is completed within the previous 7 years (year 2011, 2012, 2013,
2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018).
Project experience
- 1435 mm gauge and TSI verified railway;
- design speed above 200 km/h;
- at least 1 railway bridge, or 1 viaduct.
Language level English B2 Level.
Key-expert No. 9: Environment expert
Project experience
Language level English B2 Level.
Key-expert No. 11: Interface manager
experience as a responsible for technical interface management in at least
Project experience one railway design project completed within the previous 5 years (year
2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018).
Language level English B2 Level.
6.3. Approval process of key-experts
6.3.1. The Consultant shall receive an approval from the Client on the proposed key-experts. The Client
shall reject the proposed key-expert in case of non-compliance with minimal qualification
requirements.
6.3.2. If a certificate or/and other legal recognition document is required according to Country’s
national legislation for an expert to carry out the Design Services, is not available before the
Consultant submits the list of key-experts for the approval by the Client, the Consultant is
required the following:
a) to prove that such expert has submitted an application to receive a certificate;
b) the Consultant shall ensure that such expert has necessary education and experience to
fulfil Country’s national requirements to receive a certificate or/and other legal recognition
document;
c) the Consultant takes full responsibility for the risk if such expert would not receive a
certificate due to Consultant’s fault or insufficient understanding of Country’s national
regulations regarding certification procedures and this situation would delay the provision
of the Design Services.
6.3.3. The Consultant shall provide written and signed reference from a client proving key-expert’s
required project experience. In case a certain reference is not available, the Consultant shall
provide a self-signed declaration proving key-expert’s required project experience with client’s
contact information.
6.4. Certification requirements for key-experts
- 45 / 52 -
6.4.1. The Consultant shall be responsible for ensuring that the proposed Key-experts would have
necessary certificates or/and other legal recognition documents in accordance to the Country’s
construction legislation.
6.5. Change procedure for the key-experts
6.5.1. Only in exceptional cases key-experts included in the Agreement can be replaced. The
Consultant has no right to change the key-expert without the approval of the Client. For each
key-expert change, the Consultant shall obtain Client approval.
6.5.2. The proposed key-expert’s qualifications must be equivalent or better than the replaced key-
expert.
6.5.3. The Client reserves the right to request the Consultant to replace a key-expert in case of any of
the following reasons:
repeated careless performance of duties;
incompetence or negligence;
non-fulfilment of obligations or duties stipulated in the Agreement;
poor knowledge of English language (unsatisfactory presentation, writing skills in English);
termination of employment relations with the Consultant (Sub Consultant);
design rights no longer exist, or certificate expired during design;
6.5.4. Failing of the Consultant to propose another key-expert with equivalent or better qualifications
within 10 (ten) days, the Consultant is considered to be under Delay of obligations pursuant ot
the Agreement.
6.5.5. To change the key-expert, The Consultant shall submit a request with all documents necessary
for the Client to make sure that the proposed key-expert satisfies the qualification requirements
set for him.
6.5.6. The Client shall approve or reject the replacement, by specifying the reasons for rejection, of a
key-expert as soon as possible, but no later than within 10 (ten) days after the receipt of all
information and documents necessary for a decision and approval in accordance with the
provisions in this Agreement.
6.6. Additional experts
6.6.1. The Consultant shall ensure the participation of all the necessary additional experts, including
certified/licensed experts in such a number to complete this project.
6.6.2. The following non-exhaustive list of additional certified and licensed experts according to the
Country’s legislation are required at least in this project:
a) Special planning expert,
b) Construction planning experts (in the related fields of expertise),
c) Architect,
d) Power networks designers for all types of voltage,
e) Geospatial data experts (geodetical, land management and land cadastral surveying works),
f) Road designer,
g) Designers for different structure and building demolishing designs,
h) Railway signalling expert/designers (including for rebuilding existing 1520 mm railway),
- 46 / 52 -
i) Railway catenary expert/designer (including for rebuilding existing 1520 mm railway)
j) Railway track designers (for rebuilding existing 1520 mm railway)
k) Electronic communication systems and network designer (including for rebuilding existing
1520 mm railway)
l) All certified/licensed designers/experts to reconstruct all Affected parties’ utilities (e.g. gas
supply networks, heat supply networks, water supply networks, canalization networks,
communication cables, drainage systems etc.)
m) All certified/licensed experts in the related field of environment issue (e.g. mammal
monitoring, species and habitat protection experts, noise expert etc.) assessment,
investigations, monitoring and consultations as required in the environment requirements.
n) Public relations coordinator,
o) Stakeholder management coordinator,
p) Cultural heritage expert,
q) Deforestation expert (to prepare deforestation plans),
r) Technical translators,
s) Etc.
6.6.3. The Consultant shall include additional experts in the Consultant’s team, if it is need for design
or the Client request to include.
6.6.4. The qualification of additional experts must comply with the requirements of the design area or
related field and Country’s national legislation (if applicable). The Client does not place any
additional qualification requirements for additional experts.
6.6.5. The Consultant is responsible for the validity of the additional expert’s certificate or/and other
legal recognition document (if applicable) and to ensure its validity during the design.
6.6.6. No additional approval is required for the changing or the including of additional expert. The
Consultant shall inform the Client about this within 5 (five) days in case of an additional expert
exchange or include.
7. QUALITY ASSURANCE
7.1.1. The Consultant must prepare and submit to the Client the Consultant’s Quality Assurance Plan.
The Consultants is responsible for and shall guarantee that the investigation works and the
Design Services are controlled at all aspects of the Project implementation, and compliance with
standards and requirements is ensured. The Quality Assurance Plan shall be submitted to the
Client within the scope of Inception report.
7.1.2. The Quality Assurance plan shall include at least the following:
a) Staff organization, resources and means;
b) Management system and responsibility;
c) Control organization and procedures;
d) Design control and management;
e) Calculation checks and documentation;
f) Review procedures;
g) Control of measurement and tests, and control of remedying of deficiencies;
- 47 / 52 -
h) Control of suppliers and sub-Consultants;
i) Document, designs, report register control (document management plan).
- 48 / 52 -
8. ANNEXES
DTD TS Annex No. 1 Design guidelines
DTD TS Annex No. 2.1 CPTD EE001:
Sections 4-7
DTD TS Annex No. 3.1 Preliminary design of the railway and railway-related construction works for the Rail
Baltic 1,435 mm gauge line.
Are, Tori, Tootsi & Vändra municipality, Pärnu county. Design Section: 04. (km 15,00
until km 30,8)
DTD TS Annex No. 3.2 Preliminary design of the railway and railway-related construction works for the Rail
Baltic 1,435 mm gauge line.
Kehtna, Järvakandi, Raikküla municipality; Rapla county. Design Section: 05. (km 0,00
until km 18,6)
DTD TS Annex No. 3.3 Preliminary design of the railway and railway-related construction works for the Rail
Baltic 1,435 mm gauge line.
Kehtna, Raikküla, Rapla municipality; Rapla county. Design Section: 06. (km 0,00 until
km 18,7)
DTD TS Annex No. 3.4 Preliminary design of the railway and railway-related construction works for the Rail
Baltic 1,435 mm gauge line.
Rapla, Kohila municipality, Rapla county. Design Section: 07. (km 0,00 until km 17,4)
DTD TS Annex No. 3.5 Approved report of Strategic Environmental Assessment (link provided above)
DTD TS Annex No. 3.6 Approved County Plans of Harju-, Rapla- and Pärnumaa (link provided above)
DTD TS Annex No. 3.7 Study of ensuring the supply of mineral resources for the construction of Rail Baltica
DTD TS Annex No. 3.8 Archaeological studies of relevant areas along the planned route. (Rail Balticu trassi
arheoloogiliste eeluuringute II etapi lõpparuanne; Tartu Ülikooli ajaloo ja arheoloogia
instituut, Tartu 2015)
DTD TS Annex No. 3.9 Study and detailed plan on technical parameters and functionalities for railway
maintenance depot.
DTD TS Annex No.3.10 Topographical and Geotechnical Survey for Sections 4-7
DTD TS Annex No.3.11 Letter of Technical Regulatory Authority on Design Conditions (issued on 28.06.2018
in Estonian)
DTD TS Annex No. 4 Rail Baltica – Value Engineering methodology
DTD TS Annex No. 5 Rail Baltica – Additional requirements for site investigations
Due to the fact that the electronical documents are shared between the parties the list of the Annexes
are stored in three (3) USB drives (one (1) for each party) as follows:
Directory in
Document USB
No Document title Date Version No
reference No drive (Folder
name)
- 49 / 52 -
1 DTD TS Annex No. 1 [USB
Design guidelines RBDG-INF-001- Drive]:/Annex
August 10, 2018 0103
0103 No.1
2.1 DTD TS Annex No. 2.1 [USB
CPTD EE001: Sections 4-7 March 19, 2018 1 CPTD EE001
Drive]:/Annex
No.2.1
3.1 DTD TS Annex No. 3.1 [USB
Preliminary design of the railway Drive]:/Annex
and railway-related construction No.3.1
works for the Rail Baltic 1,435 mm
gauge line. November 30, 2016 N/A 04-GEN
Are, Tori, Tootsi & Vändra
municipality, Pärnu county.
Design Section: 04. (km 15,00 until
km 30,8)
3.2 DTD TS Annex No. 3.2 [USB
Preliminary design of the railway Drive]:/Annex
and railway-related construction No.3.2
works for the Rail Baltic 1,435 mm
gauge line. June 15, 2017 N/A 05-GEN
Kehtna, Järvakandi, Raikküla
municipality; Rapla county. Design
Section: 05. (km 0,00 until km
18,6)
3.3 DTD TS Annex No. 3.3 [USB
Preliminary design of the railway Drive]:/Annex
and railway-related construction No.3.3
works for the Rail Baltic 1,435 mm
gauge line. June 15, 2017 N/A 06-GEN
Kehtna, Raikküla, Rapla
municipality; Rapla county. Design
Section: 06. (km 0,00 until km
18,7)
3.4 DTD TS Annex No. 3.4 [USB
Preliminary design of the railway Drive]:/Annex
and railway-related construction No.3.4
works for the Rail Baltic 1,435 mm
June 15, 2017 N/A 07-GEN
gauge line.
Rapla, Kohila municipality, Rapla
county. Design Section: 07. (km
0,00 until km 17,4)
3.5 DTD TS Annex No. 3.5 Approved by [USB
Approved report of Strategic Minister of the Drive]:/Annex
N/A 7-12/17/2834-7
Environmental Assessment (link Environment No.3.5 (link)
provided above) August 09, 2017
3.6 DTD TS Annex No. 3.6 Approved by Harju: 1.1-4/41
[USB
Drive]:/Annex
Minister of Public N/A Rapla: 1.1-4/43
Administration: Pärnu: 1.1-4/40 No.3.6 (link)
- 50 / 52 -
Approved County Plans of Harju-, Harju county:
Rapla- and Pärnumaa (link February 13, 2018
provided above) Rapla county:
February 14, 2018
Pärnu county:
February 13, 2018
3.7 DTD TS Annex No. 3.7 [USB
Study of ensuring the supply of Drive]:/Annex
April 19, 2017 3 2017_0043
mineral resources for the No.3.7
construction of Rail Baltica
3.8 DTD TS Annex No. 3.8 [USB
Archaeological studies of relevant Drive]:/Annex
areas along the planned route. No.3.8
(Rail Balticu trassi arheoloogiliste 2015 N/A N/A
eeluuringute II etapi lõpparuanne;
Tartu Ülikooli ajaloo ja
arheoloogia instituut, Tartu 2015)
3.9 DTD TS Annex No. 3.9 [USB
Study and detailed plan on Drive]:/Annex
technical parameters and March 12, 2018 4 N/A No.3.9
functionalities for railway
maintenance depot.
3.10 DTD TS Annex No.3.10 Geotechnical Geotechnical [USB
Topographical and Geotechnical Survey: March 30, Survey: Drive]:/Annex
Survey for Sections 4-7 2015 RB-GL-EP-00-EL No.3.10
Topographical Topographical
Survey: N/A Survey:
February 2016 RB-GD-07a
March 2016 RB-GD-08
September 2016 RB-GD-09
RB-GD-10
3.11 DTD TS Annex No.3.11 [USB
Letter of Technical Regulatory Drive]:/Annex
June 28, 2018 N/A 6-7/18/0016/111
Authority on Design Conditions No.3.11
(issued on 28.06.2018 in Estonian)
4 DTD TS Annex No. 4 [USB
Rail Baltica – Value Engineering N/A N/A N/A
Drive]:/Annex
methodology No.4
5 DTD TS Annex No. 5 [USB
Rail Baltica – Additional Drive]:/Annex
N/A N/A N/A
requirements for site No.5
investigations
Documents issued to the Party are the versions which were part of the Procurement documentation during
the Procurement phase. These documents are inseparable part of the Agreement. In order to avoid any
doubt, the Parties confirm that these documents were already downloaded by the Consultant during the
Procurement phase, and thus they were shared to the Consultant in a correct and convenient order.
The information stipulated in section 8 of this document is handed-over to the Parties on a 3 (three) portable
media devices – one for each Party.
- 51 / 52 -
USB drive is password protected. List of files – content of the USB drive and password is issued with the
USB drive to each of the Party individually.
- 52 / 52 -
1. Appendix 3 Programme
1. Key dates as indicated in Sub-Clause 4.3.1 of the Particular Conditions:
Deadline
Design section Pärnu - Rapla (months from
Commencement Date)
1 Inception report (report and experts accepted) 1
2 Investigations (according to annex 5 of Technical specification) 7
Design priority section 1 (Kohila) 3
Design priority section 2 (Alu-Mälivere) 4
Design priority section 3 (Kärpla-Alu) 5
Design priority section 4 (Selja-Kärpla) 6
Design priority section 5 (Tootsi-Selja) 7
3 Value engineering (after technical review report approval) 11
Design priority section 1 (Kohila) 7
Design priority section 2 (Alu-Mälivere) 9
Design priority section 3 (Kärpla-Alu) 10
Design priority section 4 (Selja-Kärpla) 11
Design priority section 5 (Tootsi-Selja) 11
4 Master Design (after technical review report approval)
Design priority section 1 (Kohila) 26-Nov-20
DPS 1 BP-01 - Local Road Künka tee (BR1230) (CWP 1) 26-Nov-20
DPS 1 BP-02 - Local Road - Sihi tee (BR1410) (CWP 1) 26-Nov-20
DPS 1 BP-03 - Ecoducts: Loone & Urge (BR1610/BR1620)
(CWP 1) 26-Nov-20
DPS 1 BP-04 - Local Road - Tagadi tee (BR1210) (CWP 1) 26-Nov-20
DPS 1 BP-05 - Land Melioration (CWP 1) 02-Jan-21
DPS 1 BP-06 - Kohila Ecoduct - Structure BR1615 (CWP 1) 12-Jul-21
DPS 1 BP-07 - Railway line section Kohila Station - Harju county
(CWP 1) 02-Jan-21
DPS 1 BP-08 - Noise Barriers (CWP 1) 02-Jan-21
DPS 1 BP-09 – Utilities (CWP 1) 02-Jan-21
DPS 1 BP-10 - National Road - Tallinn - Rapla – Türi (BR1220)
(CWP 1) 26-Nov-20
DPS 1 BP-11 - Local Road - Urge tee (BR1215) (CWP 2) 26-Nov-20
DPS 1 BP-12 - Local Road - Salutaguse tee (BR1225) (CWP 2) 26-Nov-20
Design priority section 2 (Alu-Mälivere)
DPS 2 BP-01 - Local Road – Ülejõe (CWP 2) 23
DPS 2 BP-02 Railway Bridge - over Keila River (BR1040) (CWP
2) 23
DPS 2 BP-03 Tallinn-Rapla-Türi (BR1240) (CWP 1) 23
DPS 2 BP-04 Tallinn-Lelle (BR1050/BR1243) (CWP 2) 23
DPS 2 BP-05 Ecoduct - Roa (additional Eco included)
(BR1640/BR1645) (CWP 2) 23
OÜ Rail Baltic Estonia Reg. nr: 12734109 Tel. +372 686 7067
Veskiposti 2/1 VAT: EE101954107 E-mail:
[email protected]
10138 Tallinn www.rbestonia.ee
DPS 2 BP-06 Hagudi-Kodila (BR1245) (CWP 1) 23
DPS 2 BP-07 Underpass northern edge Hagudi bog (Additional
Structure) (BR1647) (CWP 2) 23
DPS 2 BP-08 Underpass southern edge Hagudi bog (Additional
Structure) (BR1648) (CWP 2) 23
DPS 2 BP-09 Seli-Koigi-Alu (BR1250) (CWP 1) 23
DPS 2 BP-10 Ecoduct – Kalevi (BR1650) (CWP 1) 23
23
DPS 2 BP-11 Local road and Bridge varbola (BR1255) (CWP 1)
23
DPS 2 BP-12 Varbola Cattle Underpass (BR1660) (CWP 2)
23
DPS 2 BP-13 Rapla-Varbola (BR1260) (CWP 1)
DPS 2 BP-14 Rail Baltica Railway line section Alu-Mälivere 23
0,000-14,070 + culverts (CWP 2)
DPS 2 BP-15 Noise Barriers (CWP 2) 23
DPS 2 BP-16 Land Melioration (CWP 2) 23
DPS 2 BP-17 Utilities (CWP 2) 23
Design priority section 3 (Kärpla-Alu)
DPS 3 BP-01 Railway Bridge over Vigala River (BR1073) (CWP
4) 23
DPS 3 BP-02 Rapla – Märjamaa(BR1275/BR1280) (CWP 4)
23
DPS 3 BP-03 Kuusiku Ecoduct (BR1685) (CWP 4) 23
DPS 3 BP-04 Rapla - Järvakandi – Kergu(BR1285) (CWP 4) 23
DPS 3 BP-05 Railway Bridge over the Kuusiku River
(BR1090) (CWP 4) 23
DPS 3 BP-06 Raela Ecoduct (BR1705) (CWP 4) 23
DPS 3 BP-07 Local Road - Aasu m/p objekti tee (BR1106) (CWP
4) 23
DPS 3 BP-08 National Road - Kehtna – Põlma (BR1300) (CWP
4) 23
DPS 3 BP-09 Railway Section Kärpla - Alu (Rapla station
included) (CWP 4) 22,5
DPS 3 BP-10 Noise Barriers (CWP 4) 23
DPS 3 BP-11 Land Melioration (CWP 4) 23
DPS 3 BP-12 Utilities (CWP 4) 23
Design priority section 4 (Selja-Kärpla)
DPS 4 BP-01 Ecoduct Karpla (05-ECO02) (BR1710) (CWP 3) 23
DPS 4 BP-02 Animal underpass (BR1720) (CWP 3) 23
DPS 4 BP-03 Velise River (05-BR04) (BR1120) (CWP 3) 23
DPS 4 BP-04 National Rapla - Järvakandi – Kergu (BR1320)
(CWP 3) 23
DPS 4 BP-05 Viaduct over Nurtu river (BR1130) (CWP 3) 23
DPS 4 BP-06 Järvakandi – Nõlva (BR1330) (CWP 3) 23
DPS 4 BP-07 Selja (05-ECO01) (BR1730) (CWP 1) 29
DPS 4 BP-08 Local Road – Kootja (BR1740) (CWP 3) 23
DPS 4 BP-09 Rail Baltica Railway line Selja - Karpla (CWP 3) 23
DPS 4 BP-10 Noise Barriers (CWP 3) 23
2
DPS 4 BP-11 Land Melioration (CWP 3) 23
DPS 4 BP-12 Utilities (CWP 3) 23
Design priority section 5 (Tootsi-Selja)
DPS 5 BP-01 Kõnnu (04-ECO05) (BR1760) (CWP 3) 33
DPS 5 BP-02 National Road - Rapla – Järvakandi (BR1160)
(CWP 3) 28
DPS 5 BP-03 Sohlu (BR1770) (CWP 3) 28
DPS 5 BP-04 Rapla - Aluste-Kergu (BR1170) (CWP 3) 31
DPS 5 BP-05 Viluvere (BR1780) (CWP 3) 28
DPS 5 BP-06 Rail Baltica Railway line Section Toosti – Selja
(CWP 3) 28
DPS 5 BP-07 Noise Barriers (CWP 3) 28
DPS 5 BP-08 Land Melioration (CWP 3) 28
DPS 5 BP-09 Utilities (CWP 3) 28
Detail Technical Design (after technical review report
5
approval)
Design priority section 1 (Kohila)
DPS 1 BP-01 - Local Road Künka tee (BR1230) (CWP 4) 22
DPS 1 BP-02 - Local Road - Sihi tee (BR1410) (CWP 4) 22
DPS 1 BP-03 - Ecoducts: Loone & Urge (BR1610/BR1620)
(CWP 4) 22
DPS 1 BP-04 - Local Road - Tagadi tee (BR1210) (CWP 4) 22
DPS 1 BP-05 - Land Melioration (CWP 4) 23.25
DPS 1 BP-06 - Kohila Ecoduct - Structure BR1615 (CWP 4) 29,5
DPS 1 BP-07 - Railway line section Kohila Station - Harju county
(CWP 4) 23.25
DPS 1 BP-08 - Noise Barriers (CWP 4) 23.25
DPS 1 BP-09 – Utilities (CWP 4) 23.25
DPS 1 BP-10 - National Road - Tallinn - Rapla – Türi (BR1220)
(CWP 4) 22
DPS 1 BP-11 - Local Road - Urge tee (BR1215) (CWP 4) 22
DPS 1 BP-12 - Local Road - Salutaguse tee (BR1225) (CWP 4) 22
Design priority section 2 (Alu-Mälivere)
DPS 2 BP-01 - Local Road – Ülejõe (CWP 4) 27
DPS 2 BP-02 Railway Bridge - over Keila River (BR1040) (CWP
4) 27
DPS 2 BP-03 Tallinn-Rapla-Türi (BR1240) (CWP 4) 27
DPS 2 BP-04 Tallinn-Lelle (BR1050/BR1243) (CWP 4) 27
DPS 2 BP-05 Ecoduct - Roa (additional Eco included)
(BR1640/BR1645) (CWP 4) 27
DPS 2 BP-06 Hagudi-Kodila (BR1245) (CWP 4) 27
DPS 2 BP-07 Underpass northern edge Hagudi bog (Additional
Structure) (BR1647) (CWP 4) 27
DPS 2 BP-08 Underpass southern edge Hagudi bog (Additional
Structure) (BR1648) (CWP 4) 27
DPS 2 BP-09 Seli-Koigi-Alu (BR1250) (CWP 4) 27
DPS 2 BP-10 Ecoduct – Kalevi (BR1650) (CWP 4) 27
DPS 2 BP-11 Local road and Bridge varbola (BR1255) (CWP 4) 27
3
DPS 2 BP-12 Varbola Cattle Underpass (BR1660) (CWP 4) 27
DPS 2 BP-13 Rapla-Varbola (BR1260) (CWP 4) 27
DPS 2 BP-14 Rail Baltica Railway line section Alu-Mälivere
0,000-14,070 + culverts (CWP 4) 27
DPS 2 BP-15 Noise Barriers (CWP 4) 27
27
DPS 2 BP-16 Land Melioration (CWP 4)
DPS 2 BP-17 Utilities (CWP 4) 27
Design priority section 3 (Kärpla-Alu)
DPS 3 BP-01 Railway Bridge over Vigala River (BR1073) (CWP
4) 27
DPS 3 BP-02 Rapla – Märjamaa(BR1275/BR1280) (CWP 4) 27
DPS 3 BP-03 Kuusiku Ecoduct (BR1685) (CWP4) 27
DPS 3 BP-04 Rapla - Järvakandi – Kergu(BR1285) (CWP 4) 27
DPS 3 BP-05 Railway Bridge over the Kuusiku River
(BR1090) (CWP 4)
DPS 3 BP-06 Raela Ecoduct (BR1705) (CWP 4) 27
DPS 3 BP-07 Local Road - Aasu m/p objekti tee (BR1106) (CWP
4) 27
DPS 3 BP-08 National Road - Kehtna – Põlma (BR1300) (CWP
4) 27
DPS 3 BP-09 Railway Section Kärpla - Alu (Rapla station
included) (CWP 4) 30
27
DPS 3 BP-10 Noise Barriers (CWP 4)
27
DPS 3 BP-11 Land Melioration (CWP 4)
27
DPS 3 BP-12 Utilities (CWP 4)
Design priority section 4 (Selja-Kärpla)
DPS 4 BP-01 Ecoduct Karpla (05-ECO02) (BR1710) (CWP 4) 28
DPS 4 BP-02 Animal underpass (BR1720) (CWP 4) 28
DPS 4 BP-03 Velise River (05-BR04) (BR1120) (CWP 4) 28
DPS 4 BP-04 National Rapla - Järvakandi – Kergu (BR1320)
(CWP 4) 28
DPS 4 BP-05 Viaduct over Nurtu river (BR1130) (CWP 4) 28
DPS 4 BP-06 Järvakandi – Nõlva (BR1330) (CWP 4) 28
DPS 4 BP-07 Selja (05-ECO01) (BR1730) (CWP 4) 34
DPS 4 BP-08 Local Road – Kootja (BR1740) (CWP 4) 28
DPS 4 BP-09 Rail Baltica Railway line Selja - Karpla (CWP 4) 28
DPS 4 BP-10 Noise Barriers (CWP 4) 28
DPS 4 BP-11 Land Melioration (CWP 4) 28
DPS 4 BP-12 Utilities (CWP 4) 28
4
Design priority section 5 (Tootsi-Selja)
DPS 5 BP-01 Kõnnu (04-ECO05) (BR1760) (CWP 5) 36
DPS 5 BP-02 National Road - Rapla – Järvakandi (BR1160)
(CWP 5) 31
DPS 5 BP-03 Sohlu (BR1770) (CWP 5) 31
DPS 5 BP-04 Rapla - Aluste-Kergu (BR1170) (CWP 5) 34
DPS 5 BP-05 Viluvere (BR1780) (CWP 5) 31
DPS 5 BP-06 Rail Baltica Railway line Section Toosti – Selja
(CWP 5) 31
DPS 5 BP-07 Noise Barriers (CWP 5) 31
DPS 5 BP-08 Land Melioration (CWP 5) 31
DPS 5 BP-09 Utilities (CWP 5) 31
1.1 Key dates as indicated in Sub-Clause 4.3.1 of the Particular Conditions and as concerns Design Services
Variations with financial impact:
Deadline Design Priority
(months from Section
No Design section Pärnu - Rapla Commencement
Date, completion
deadline)
Master Design (after technical review report
41 x x
approval) related additional Services
Preliminary estimate for Environmental Impact Design priority
26 September 2020
Assessment section 1 (Kohila)
Additional works for Kohila entrance (T15 Located in Design
national road Preliminary estimate for priority section 1,
26 November 2020
Environmental Impact Assessment) but separate from
DPS1 deadlines
Additional works for Kohila entrance (Urge local Located in Design
road) priority section 1,
1 March 2021
but separate from
DPS1 deadlines
Additional works for Kohila entrance Located in Design
(Salutaguse local road) priority section 1,
30 November 2020
but separate from
DPS1 deadlines
Preliminary estimate for Environmental Impact Design priority
Assessment 21 section 2 (Alu-
Mälivere)
Preliminary estimate for Environmental Impact Design priority
Assessment 21 section 3 (Kärpla-
Alu)
Preliminary estimate for Environmental Impact Design priority
Assessment 23 section 4 (Selja-
Kärpla)
Preliminary estimate for Environmental Impact Design priority
Assessment 23 section 5 (Tootsi-
Selja)
5
VO LET_0120 – Platform Height Changes Design priority
02 January 21
section 1 (Kohila)
VO LET_0251 – Kaisma halt access stairs in DPS5 Design priority
31
BP04 section 5
12. Key dates as indicated in Sub-Clause 4.3.1 of the Particular Conditions and as concerns Design Services
Variations with financial impact:
Deadline Design Priority
(months from Section
No Railway section Pärnu - Rapla Commencement
Date, completion
deadline)
Master Design (after technical review report
42 x x
approval) related additional Services
Environmental Impact Assessment for Design Design priority
42.1 priority section 5 28 section 5 (Tootsi-
Selja)
13. Key dates as indicated in Sub-Clause 4.3.1 of the Particular Conditions and as concerns Design Services
Variations with financial impact:
Deadline Design Priority
(months from Section
No Railway section Pärnu - Rapla Commencement
Date, completion
deadline)
Detailed Technical Design (after technical
43 review report approval) related additional x x
Services
VO LET_0120 – Platform Height Changes Design priority
43.1 23.5
section 1 (Kohila)
VO LET_0251 – Kaisma halt access stairs in DPS5 Design priority
43.2 BP04 34 section 5 (Tootsi-
Selja)
2. The Consultant shall prepare and submit to the Implementing Body within the scope of Inception
Report, in accordance with Clause 4.3.1 of the General Conditions and Particular conditions, the
Programme, including, but not limited to:
2.1. the risks management section, stipulating how exactly the Consultant will cover risks
specified in Technical Specification, including risks deriving from the application of Technical
Specification;
2.2. the project organization chart with key-experts with names and surnames and also CV’s and
supporting information proving their compliance with the qualification and other requirements
stipulated in the Technical Specification and non-key experts for each discipline category, roles
and responsibilities;
2.3. detailed Service schedule with all Service activities according to the Services that has to be
provided under the Agreement. This schedule shall reflect key deliverables of the documents,
reviewing and approval processes, including the time required for the review, expertise and other
options;
2.4. description of the main Service processes;
2.5. a clear graphically distinguished critical path;
2.6. estimated expected payments (cash flow) in monthly intervals;
6
2.7. BEP plan as required in the Technical Specification.
3. The Programme must be prepared in PDF and Primavera P6 formats. For the purpose of submitting
the Tender the PDF only version is acceptable, however, for the Consultant, as a minimum, the
Contracting Authority requires a conversion to Primavera P6, plus PDF. P3e and other formats are not
allowed, to the level of detail equivalent to AACE Level 4 (detailed level; program) or equivalent.
Detailed Service schedule should be prepared in Microsoft Excel and Primavera P6 formats. Monthly
status updates should be done in Primavera P6 formats, but weekly - in Microsoft Excel format and
shared with the Implementing Body. Detailed Service schedule weekly status updates should include
justification for any foreseen delay. The above will be treated as unilaterally made explanations by the
Consultant. The Implementing Body reserves all rights thereto.
4 The Consultant shall prepare, submit and present the Project Management Plan (the document that
describes how the project will be executed, monitored, controlled, and closed after the Warranty period,
and Defect Notification period) in accordance with PMBOK (Project Management Body of
Knowledge), or IPMA (International Project Management Association) or other equivalent/similar
requirements. If this plan is included in the Programme, the Consultant shall provide it in the separate
section.
5. Within fourteen (14) Days after Agreement Amendment No 8 enters into force the Consultant shall
provide the Implementing Body with a detailed Primavera P6 schedule covering all Design Services
remaining scope, after omissions (Annex 2 [Omitted DTD Services for EE DS1]).
6. The Consultant shall commit to execute the Services within the framework stipulated in Annex 2
[Omitted DTD Services for EE DS1]. The Consultant states that it is feasible to execute the Services
and states that there is no event, required condition or circumstance known to the Consultant and
within/under direct control of the Consultant that could preclude the Consultant from implementation
of the Annex 2 [Omitted DTD Services for EE DS1] in quality required contractually and by applicable
laws. This does not limit the right of the Consultant to claim for extension of time in accordance with
the Agreement if there are justifiable circumstances, as well as the right of the Implementing Body to
apply contractual penalties.
7. The Consultant and the Implementing Body confirm that the Programme is made without prejudice
over the liability of the Consultant or the Implementing Body for the delays that have occurring until
the signing of this amendment. Each party reserves all rights thereto, including rights related to damages,
penalties, times extension, additional remuneration. The Programme reflects the foreseen Service
delivery dates at the Agreement signature date of the original Agreement or the ones agreed and signed
on the latest Amendment to the original Agreement. The Parties agree that the Programme may be
amended if the Parties agree on variations and / or time extension justified according to the applicable
laws and contractual framework.
7
1. Appendix 4 Remuneration and Payment
GENERAL PROVISIONS
1.0. As compensation for the preparation of the Services provided hereunder, the Implementing Body
shall pay the Consultant the remuneration (the “Remuneration”) comprising the following:
1.0.1. a service fee in the amount of EUR 7 175 051,55 (seven million one hundred seventy-five
thousand and fifty-one euro and fifty-five cents), excluding value added tax (VAT), split as
follows:
(i) Design Services (Phase 1), on a fixed price lump sum basis in the amount of EUR
6’631’577,55 (six million, six hundred thirty-one thousand, five hundred seventy-seven
euros and fifty-five cents.), excluding VAT; and
(ii) Design Supervision Services (Phase 2), on a cost reimbursable basis, capped at the
maximum total amount of EUR 543’474,00 (five hundred forty-three thousand four
hundred seventy-four euro), excluding VAT.
In any occasion VAT shall be charged at the prevailing rate in accordance with applicable Law
of the Country.
1.1. The Remuneration is the all-inclusive consideration for the duly provided Services. The
Implementing Body or the Client shall have no obligation to reimburse any cost to the Consultant
in excess of this consideration without a prior written agreement between the Parties. Subject to
the provisions of item 1.3 below, the Remuneration includes reimbursement of all and any
expenditure incurred by the Consultant toward performance of any steps, actions or measures
contemplated in accordance with this Agreement (including, without limitation, site surveys,
travel costs within the Design Services and Design Supervision Services stages and the cost of
training of personnel of the Client (if required), any taxes payable by the Consultant (including
any withholdings), fees and other costs except for VAT), whether or not they are contained in
this Appendix. In order to avoid any doubt, The Consultant agrees and acknowledges that, except
as set forth in item 1.3 below, it shall have no right to request reimbursement from the Client or
the Implementing Body of any additional expenditure whatsoever (without prior written
agreement with the Client) as may have been incurred by the Consultant toward provision of the
Services contemplated by this Agreement.
1.2. Payment of the Remuneration for the Services is split as shown in Clause 2.4 and rearranged in
Clause 2.41 and will be paid on the basis of
1.2.1. a valid and correct invoice after the completion of particular Services, and
1.2.2. handing over and accepting of the relevant Service (or a part of it) in accordance with
the Agreement.
1.3. The Remuneration shall not be paid for the Services or part of them, which does not comply
with the provisions of this Agreement until the non-compliance has been eliminated and the
Client has accepted the Services or a part of them in accordance with the Agreement.
1.4. The Consultant is deemed to have satisfied himself as to the true extent and quantity of the
Services.
1.5. Each Party shall bear its own bank charges or expenses incurred in connection with the transfer
of any payments.
1.6. Contractual penalty rate for delayed delivery of Services as set forth in Sub-Clause 4.4.4 of the
Particular Conditions shall be 0.05% of the total Remuneration per single day, but not exceeding
10% of the Remuneration. Contractual penalty rate stipulated in this item is not applicable in
case if the delay is caused by Exceptional Event.
1.7. Contractual penalty rate for material breach as set forth in Sub-Clause 7.2.2. of the Particular
Conditions shall be calculated in accordance with the afore mentioned Sub-Clause at the rate of
OÜ Rail Baltic Estonia Reg. nr: 12734109 Tel. +372 686 7067
Veskiposti 2/1 VAT: EE101954107 E-mail:
[email protected]
10138 Tallinn www.rbestonia.ee
0.05% of unpaid amount, but not exceeding 10% of the Remuneration. Contractual penalty rate
stipulated in this item is not applicable in case if the delay is caused by Exceptional Event.
1.8. Contractual penalty rate for material breach as set forth in Sub-Clause 8.1.5 of the Particular
Conditions shall be 10% from the total Remuneration payable to the Consultant pursuant to
conditions of the Agreement. Contractual penalty rate stipulated in this item is not applicable in
case if the delay is caused by Exceptional Event.
1.9. Contractual penalty rate for the Consultant’s failure to perform any other obligation (rather than
per item 1.7) arising out of the Agreement in due time shall be 0.001% of the total Remuneration
calculated from the first delayed date to the actual date the specific obligation is fulfilled, but
not exceeding 10% of the Remuneration. Contractual penalty rate stipulated in this item is not
applicable in case if the delay is caused by Exceptional Event.
1.10. In case if full / partial Remuneration for the Services provided is deemed to be ineligible to fund
due to the Consultant’s fault or inaction, particular amount of Remuneration shall be withheld
until the outstanding issues, defects, inconsistencies and incompliances are resolved provided
that the Client shall reasonably assist the Consultant to resolve these issues.
1.11. Any amounts overpaid or otherwise transferred to the Consultant in the amount having no basis
shall be returned immediately.
1.12. The payment of any of the penalties does not release the Consultant from liability.
PRICING SCHEDULES
2.0. These pricing schedules have not been compiled in line with any recognised industry method of
measurement but as a means of formulating the amount of Remuneration for the Agreement and
to form the basis of valuing Variations together with other schedules and rates tables provided
in this Agreement.
2.1. The Consultant is deemed to have provided a price in the form of Remuneration for all items
included in these pricing schedules. The cost of any Services for which no item is provided and
items which are left un-priced by the Consultant will be deemed included.
2.2. Any amendments made to these pricing schedules do not change the Consultant’s obligation to
complete the Services in accordance with the Agreement.
2
2.3. Design Services
Design section Pärnu – Contract stage Evidence /
Rapla Remuneration Documentation for
(EUR) Payment in
accordance with the
approval procedures
in the Particular
Conditions
1 Inception Report (report Client’s positive report
and experts accepted) on the Inception Report
312’952,40 and, Provisional
Delivery and
Acceptance Certificate
and Consultant’s
invoice
2 Investigations (according
to annex 5 of Technical x
specification)
Design priority section 1 Provisional Delivery
(Kohila) 125’180,96 and Acceptance
Certificate and
Consultant’s invoice
Design priority section 2 Provisional Delivery
(Alu-Mälivere) and Acceptance
125’180,96
Certificate and
Consultant’s invoice
Design priority section 3 Provisional Delivery
(Kärpla-Alu) and Acceptance
125’180,96
Certificate and
Consultant’s invoice
Design priority section 4 Provisional Delivery
(Selja-Kärpla) and Acceptance
125’180,96
Certificate and
Consultant’s invoice
Design priority section 5 Provisional Delivery
(Tootsi-Selja) and Acceptance
125’180,96
Certificate and
Consultant’s invoice
3 Value engineering (after
technical review) x
Design priority section 1 Provisional Delivery
(Kohila) and Acceptance
312’952,40
Certificate and
Consultant’s invoice
Design priority section 2 Provisional Delivery
(Alu-Mälivere) and Acceptance
312’952,40
Certificate and
Consultant’s invoice
Design priority section 3 Provisional Delivery
312’952,40
(Kärpla-Alu) and Acceptance
3
Certificate and
Consultant’s invoice
Design priority section 4 Provisional Delivery
(Selja-Kärpla) and Acceptance
312’952,40
Certificate and
Consultant’s invoice
Design priority section 5 Provisional Delivery
(Tootsi-Selja) and Acceptance
312’952,40
Certificate and
Consultant’s invoice
4 Master Design (after
technical review) x
Design priority section 1 Provisional Delivery
(Kohila) 438’133,36 and Acceptance
Certificate and
Consultant’s invoice
Design priority section 2 Provisional Delivery
(Alu-Mälivere) 438’133,36 and Acceptance
Certificate and
Consultant’s invoice
Design priority section 3 Provisional Delivery
(Kärpla-Alu) 438’133,36 and Acceptance
Certificate and
Consultant’s invoice
Design priority section 4 Provisional Delivery
(Selja-Kärpla) 438’133,36 and Acceptance
Certificate and
Consultant’s invoice
Design priority section 5 Provisional Delivery
(Tootsi-Selja) 438’133,36 and Acceptance
Certificate and
Consultant’s invoice
5 Detail Technical Design
(after technical review) x
Design priority section 1 Provisional Delivery
(Kohila) and Acceptance
245527,30
Certificate and
Consultant’s invoice
Design priority section 2 Provisional Delivery
(Alu-Mälivere) and Acceptance
245527,30
Certificate and
Consultant’s invoice
Design priority section 3 Provisional Delivery
(Kärpla-Alu) and Acceptance
245527,30
Certificate and
Consultant’s invoice
Design priority section 4 Provisional Delivery
(Selja-Kärpla) and Acceptance
245527,30
Certificate and
Consultant’s invoice
Design priority section 5 Provisional Delivery
245527,30
(Tootsi-Selja) and Acceptance
4
Certificate and
Consultant’s invoice
Total Remuneration for
Design Services 5 921 922,50
REARRANGEMENT OF PAYMENT SCHEDULE PRINCIPLES
2.41 The Consultant and the Client have rearranged the pricing schedules for Master Design (hereinafter –
“MD”) and Detailed Technical Design (hereinafter – “DTD”) deliverables on basis of the following
principles:
2.41.1 The existing Design Priority Sections (hereinafter – “DPS”) are divided into separate construction
objects (hereinafter – “CO1”). The value assigned for MD of CO or DTD of CO for respective DPS
is split into equal parts per number of COs in respective DPS as seen in Clause 2.4 2 of Appendix 4
of the Agreement.
2.41.2 COs are repackaged into new packages required for the construction sections (hereinafter – “CW
package”) based on the contracting strategy of the Estonian Implementing Body (Appendix 3 of the
Agreement). The value of repackaged design package is the sum of the respective CW Package and
is equal to the cumulative value of COs composing the respective CW Package.
2.41.3 In case any CO is relocated to a different CW Package by amending the Programme (Appendix 3 of
the Agreement) in comparison to which it was allocated in this Appendix, the payment for the
removed CO shall not be altered in any way and the payment for the CW Package from which the
CO was removed from and added to should be altered accordingly as described in Clause 2.4 1.2
above. CW Package compositions from which the CO has been removed should be considered
as a whole without the removed CO.
2.41.4 Payment to the Consultant for CW package 2 and 5 is done after completion of the respective CW
package, whereas payment to the Consultant for CW packages 1, 3 and 4 is done after completion of
each Sub-package. Evidence and documentation for Payment of respective CW package and Sub-
package, as the case may be, should be provided in accordance with the approval procedures in the
Particular Conditions, i.e., for MD -Provisional Delivery and Acceptance Certificate and
Consultant’s invoice and for DTD - Provisional Delivery and Acceptance Certificate and
Consultant’s invoice.
2.41.5 In addition to provision mentioned in Cause 2.41.4, evidence for Payment for the last CW package
or Sub-package, as the case may be, (for MD) of initial DPS is the approved Final Consolidated BIM
for initial DPS, and for Payment for the last CWP (for MD) of the Agreement– approved Final
Consolidated BIM (for MD) of all DPS of the Agreement. Final Consolidated BIM should include
the following:
1
2.4 .5.1 Federated model and geotechnical profile;
2.41.5.2 Clash detection model;
2.41.5.3 4D simulation;
2.41.5.4 Visualization (only applicable to Final Consolidated BIM after MD).
Materials listed above shall be submitted once the approval of all CO in the last CW package for
initial DPS or approval of all CO in the last CW package of the Agreement is achieved. They can
only be carried out with the final and approved version of COs. Final Consolidated BIM (for MD)
shall not be an obstacle to the approval of the individual COs, but a payment condition as described
above. Final Consolidated BIM (for MD) shall be submitted as an addendum and no resubmission of
any previous approved COs shall be required for this reason, except if corrections are required in
approved CO due to any clash identified during the federation of BIM models.
1
CO is described in table below as BP
5
2.41.5.5. The payments for signed Variations/claims will be made upon acceptance of the Client of
Implementing Body. When a particular completed and approved Variation/claim has impact on the
overall approval of the CW package it belongs to, this Variation/claim will be paid once the CW
package is approved. Should a claim/Variation part of a CO be finished with no impact or influence
over the approval of the CO and/or the CW package it belongs to, the Variation/claim can be invoiced
and paid even if the CO it belongs is not finished and approved. In case it is unclear to which group
Variation/claim should be attributed to, the Parties agree to settle this issue through negotiations.
2.42 Design Services Variations with financial impact by splitting Master Design (after technical
review report approval) and Detail Technical Design (after technical review report approval) as
concerns all Design priority Sections
No Payment schedule per every Agreement Evidence / Documentation for
section stage Payment in accordance with the
Remuneratio approval procedures in the
n (EUR) Particular Conditions
51 Master Design (after technical review)
Provisional Delivery and
Construction Work Package 1
1. 750 832,95 Acceptance Certificate and
(CWP 1)
Consultants invoice*
DPS 1 BP-02 - Sihi Local Road 36 511,11
(BR1410-OR1410)
DPS 1 BP-05 - Land Melioration 36 511,11
DPS 1 BP-07 - Railway line section 36 511,11
Kohila - Harju county
DPS 1 BP-08 - Noise Barriers 36 511,11
DPS 1 BP-09 - Utilities 36 511,11
Provisional Delivery and
Sub-Package 1.1: MD Delivery
259 723,20 Acceptance Certificate and
package No1 of Priority Objects
Consultants invoice*
DPS 1 BP-01 - Künka Local Road
36 511,11
(BR1230-OR1230)
DPS 1 BP-03 - Ecoducts: Loone &
36 511,11
Urge (BR1610/BR1620)
DPS 1 BP-04 - Tagadi Local Road
36 511,11
(BR1210-OR1210)
DPS 1 BP-10 - Tallinn - Rapla - Türi
National Road T15 Kohila (BR1220- 36 511,11
OR1220)
DPS 2 BP-09 Seli - Koigi - Alu
National Road T20131 (BR1250- 25 722,55
OR1250)
DPS 2 BP-10 Kalevi Ecoduct
25 722,55
(BR1650)
DPS 2 BP-11 Varbola Local Road
25 722,55
(BR1255-OR1255)
DPS 3 BP-08 Kehtna - Põlma
National Road T20149 (BR1300- 36 511,11
OR1300)
6
Provisional Delivery and
Sub-Package 1.2:MD Delivery
308 554,20 Acceptance Certificate and
package No2 of Priority Objects
Consultants invoice*
DPS 1 BP-06 - Kohila Ecoduct
36 511,11
(BR1615)
DPS 2 BP-03 Tallinn - Rapla - Türi
National Road T15 Mälivere 25 772,55
(BR1240-OR1240)
DPS 2 BP-06 Hagudi - Kodila
National Road T20113 (BR1245- 25 772,55
OR1245)
DPS 2 BP-13 Rapla - Varbola
National Road T20141 (BR1260- 25 772,55
OR1260)
DPS 3 BP-02 Rapla - Märjamaa
National Road T28 (BR1275- 36 511,11
OR1275) incl BR1280
DPS 3 BP-04 Rapla - Järvakandi -
Kergu National Road T27 (BR1285- 36 511,11
OR1285)
DPS 3 BP-07 Aasu m/p Local Road
36 511,11
(BR1106-OR1106)
DPS 4 BP-07 Selja Ecoduct
36 511,11
(BR1730)
DPS 5 BP-01 Kõnnu Ecoduct
48 681,00
(BR1760)
Construction Work Package 2 356 670,92 Provisional Delivery and
2. (CWP 2) Acceptance Certificate and
Consultants invoice*
DPS 1 BP-11 - Urge Local Road 36 511,11
(BR1215-OR1215)
DPS 1 BP-12 - Salutaguse Local 36 511,11
Road (BR1225-OR1225)
DPS 2 BP-01 - Local Road – Ülejõe 25 772,55
DPS 2 BP-02 Keila River Railway 25 772,55
Bridge (BR1040)
DPS 2 BP-04 Tallinn-Lelle 1520 25 772,55
Railway overpass (BR1050) and
Tallinn-Lelle 1520 Railway Tamme
local road underpass (BR1243)
DPS 2 BP-05 Röa Ecoduct (BR1640) 25 772,55
and Röa Ecoduct over Tallinn-Lelle
1520 Railway (BR1645)
DPS 2 BP-07 Underpass northern 25 772,55
edge Hagudi bog (BR1647)
DPS 2 BP-08 Underpass southern 25 772,55
edge Hagudi bog (BR1648)
DPS 2 BP-12 Varbola Cattle 25 772,55
Underpass (BR1660)
DPS 2 BP-14 Rail Baltica Railway 25 772,55
line section Alu-Mälivere 0,000-
14,070
7
DPS 2 BP-15 Noise Barriers 25 772,55
DPS 2 BP-16 Land Melioration 25 772,55
DPS 2 BP-17 Utilities 25 923,20
Construction Work Package 3 1 083 162,93 Provisional Delivery and
3. (CWP 3) Acceptance Certificate and
Consultants invoice*
Sub-Package CW 3.1. CW Package 292 088,88 Provisional Delivery and
MD to be approved DPS3 Acceptance Certificate and
Consultants invoice*
DPS 3 BP-01 Vigala River Railway 36 511,11
Bridge (BR1073)
DPS 3 BP-03 Kuusiku Ecoduct 36 511,11
(BR1685)
DPS 3 BP-05 Rõue River Railway 36 511,11
Bridge (BR1090)
DPS 3 BP-06 Raela Ecoduct 36 511,11
(BR1705)
DPS 3 BP-09 Railway Section 36 511,11
Kärpla - Alu
DPS 3 BP-10 Noise Barriers 36 511,11
DPS 3 BP-11 Land Melioration 36 511,11
DPS 3 BP-12 Utilities 36 511,11
Subpackage CW 3.2 CW package 401 622,21 Provisional Delivery and
MD to be approved DPS4 Acceptance Certificate and
Consultants invoice*
DPS 4 BP-01 Kärpla Ecoduct 36 511,11
(BR1710)
DPS 4 BP-02 Animal underpass 36 511,11
(BR1720)
DPS 4 BP-03 Velise River Railway 36 511,11
Bridge (BR1120)
DPS 4 BP-04 Rapla - Järvakandi - 36 511,11
Kergu National Road T27 (BR1320-
OR1320)
DPS 4 BP-05 Nurtu River Railway 36 511,11
Bridge (BR1130)
DPS 4 BP-06 Järvakandi - Nõlva 36 511,11
Local Road (BR1330-OR1330)
DPS 4 BP-08 Kootja Local Road and 36 511,11
animal path (BR1740-OR1740)
DPS 4 BP-09 Rail Baltica Railway 36 511,11
line Selja - Karpla
DPS 4 BP-10 Noise Barriers 36 511,11
DPS 4 BP-11 Land Melioration 36 511,11
DPS 4 BP-12 Utilities 36 511,11
Sub-package 3.3 CW package MD 389 451,84 Provisional Delivery and
to be approved DPS5 Acceptance Certificates on all CO
of the package and Consultant’s
invoice*
8
DPS 5 BP-02 Rapla - Järvakandi - 48 681,48
Kergu National Road T27 (BR1160-
OR1160)
DPS 5 BP-03 Sohlu Ecoduct 48 681,48
(BR1770)
DPS 5 BP-04 Aluste-Kergu 48 681,48
(BR1170-OR1170)
DPS 5 BP-05 Viluvere Ecoduct 48 681,48
(BR1780)
DPS 5 BP-06 Rail Baltica Railway 48 681,48
line Section Toosti - Selja
DPS 5 BP-07 Noise Barriers 48 681,48
DPS 5 BP-08 Land Melioration 48 681,48
DPS 5 BP-09 Utilities 48 681,48
1
6 . Detail technical design (after technical review report approval)
Construction Work Package 4 982109,20 Provisional Delivery and
4. (CWP 4) Acceptance Certificate and
Consultants invoice
Sub Package 4.1 CW package DTD 491054,60 Provisional Delivery and
to be approved: Acceptance Certificate and
Consultants invoice
4.1.1 Design priority section 1 (Kohila) 245527,30 Provisional Delivery and
Acceptance Certificate and
Consultants invoice
DPS 1 BP-01 - Künka Local Road
(BR1230-OR1230)
DPS 1 BP-02 - Sihi Local Road
(BR1410-OR1410)
DPS 1 BP-03 - Ecoducts: Loone &
Urge (BR1610/BR1620)
DPS 1 BP-04 - Tagadi Local Road
(BR1210-OR1210)
DPS 1 BP-05 - Land Melioration
DPS 1 BP-06 - Kohila Ecoduct
(BR1615)
DPS 1 BP-07 - Railway line section
Kohila - Harju county
DPS 1 BP-08 - Noise Barriers
DPS 1 BP-09 - Utilities
DPS 1 BP-10 - Tallinn - Rapla - Türi
National Road T15 Kohila (BR1220-
OR1220)
DPS 1 BP-11 - Urge Local Road
(BR1215-OR1215)
DPS 1 BP-12 - Salutaguse Local
Road (BR1225-OR1225)
4.1.2 Design priority section 2 (Alu- 245527,30 Provisional Delivery and
Mälivere) Acceptance Certificate and
Consultants invoice
DPS 2 BP-01 - Local Road – Ülejõe
9
DPS 2 BP-02 Keila River Railway
Bridge (BR1040)
DPS 2 BP-03 Tallinn - Rapla - Türi
National Road T15 Mälivere
(BR1240-OR1240)
DPS 2 BP-04 Tallinn-Lelle 1520
Railway overpass (BR1050) and
Tallinn-Lelle 1520 Railway Tamme
local road underpass (BR1243)
DPS 2 BP-05 Röa Ecoduct (BR1640)
and Röa Ecoduct over Tallinn-Lelle
1520 Railway (BR1645)
DPS 2 BP-06 Hagudi - Kodila
National Road T20113 (BR1245-
OR1245)
DPS 2 BP-07 Underpass northern
edge Hagudi bog (BR1647)
DPS 2 BP-08 Underpass southern
edge Hagudi bog (BR1648)
DPS 2 BP-09 Seli - Koigi - Alu
National Road T20131 (BR1250-
OR1250)
DPS 2 BP-10 Kalevi Ecoduct
(BR1650)
DPS 2 BP-11 Varbola Local Road
(BR1255-OR1255)
DPS 2 BP-12 Varbola Cattle
Underpass (BR1660)
DPS 2 BP-13 Rapla - Varbola
National Road T20141 (BR1260-
OR1260)
DPS 2 BP-14 Rail Baltica Railway
line section Alu-Mälivere 0,000-
14,070
DPS 2 BP-15 Noise Barriers
DPS 2 BP-16 Land Melioration
DPS 2 BP-17 Utilities
Sub package 4.2 CW package DTD 491054,60 Provisional Delivery and
to be approved: Acceptance Certificate of all CO of
the package and Consultant’s
invoice**
4.2.1 Design priority section 3 (Kärpla- 245527,30 Provisional Delivery and
Alu) Acceptance Certificate and
Consultants invoice
DPS 3 BP-01 Vigala River Railway
Bridge (BR1073)
DPS 3 BP-02 Rapla - Märjamaa
National Road T28 (BR1275-
OR1275) incl BR1280
DPS 3 BP-03 Kuusiku Ecoduct
(BR1685)
10
DPS 3 BP-04 Rapla - Järvakandi -
Kergu National Road T27 (BR1285-
OR1285)
DPS 3 BP-05 Rõue River Railway
Bridge (BR1090)
DPS 3 BP-06 Raela Ecoduct
(BR1705)
DPS 3 BP-07 Aasu m/p Local Road
(BR1106-OR1106)
DPS 3 BP-08 Kehtna - Põlma
National Road T20149 (BR1300-
OR1300)
DPS 3 BP-09 Railway Section
Kärpla - Alu
DPS 3 BP-10 Noise Barriers
DPS 3 BP-11 Land Melioration
DPS 3 BP-12 Utilities
4.2.2 Design priority section 4 (Selja- 245527,30 Provisional Delivery and
Kärpla) Acceptance Certificate and
Consultants invoice
DPS 4 BP-01 Kärpla Ecoduct
(BR1710)
DPS 4 BP-02 Animal underpass
(BR1720)
DPS 4 BP-03 Velise River Railway
Bridge (BR1120)
DPS 4 BP-04 Rapla - Järvakandi -
Kergu National Road T27 (BR1320-
OR1320)
DPS 4 BP-05 Nurtu River Railway
Bridge (BR1130)
DPS 4 BP-06 Järvakandi - Nõlva
Local Road (BR1330-OR1330)
DPS 4 BP-07 Selja Ecoduct
(BR1730)
DPS 4 BP-08 Kootja Local Road and
animal path (BR1740-OR1740)
DPS 4 BP-09 Rail Baltica Railway
line Selja - Karpla
DPS 4 BP-10 Noise Barriers
DPS 4 BP-11 Land Melioration
DPS 4 BP-12 Utilities
Construction Work Package 5 245527,30 Provisional Delivery and
5. (CWP 5) Acceptance Certificate and
Consultants invoice*
5.1 Design priority section 5 (Tootsi- 245527,30 Provisional Delivery and
Selja) Acceptance Certificate and
Consultants invoice
DPS 5 BP-01 Kõnnu Ecoduct
(BR1760)
11
DPS 5 BP-02 Rapla - Järvakandi -
Kergu National Road T27 (BR1160-
OR1160)
DPS 5 BP-03 Sohlu Ecoduct
(BR1770)
DPS 5 BP-04 Aluste-Kergu
(BR1170-OR1170)
DPS 5 BP-05 Viluvere Ecoduct
(BR1780)
DPS 5 BP-06 Rail Baltica Railway
line Section Toosti - Selja
DPS 5 BP-07 Noise Barriers
DPS 5 BP-08 Land Melioration
DPS 5 BP-09 Utilities
*- additional evidence for Payment for the last CW package or Sub-package is the approved Final
Consolidated BIM for the Master Design of all the DPS.
2.43 Design Services Variations with financial impact
No Design section Contract Evidence / Design Priority
Pärnu – Rapla stage Documentation for Section
Remunera Payment in accordance
tion with the approval
(EUR) procedures in the
Particular Conditions
42 Master Design (after X x x
technical review)
related additional
Services
42.1 Preliminary estimate 14000,00 Provisional Delivery and Design priority section
for Environmental Acceptance Certificate 1 (Kohila)
Impact Assessment and Consultants invoice
42.2 Additional works for 3500,00 Provisional Delivery and Located in Design
Kohila entrance (T15 Acceptance Certificate section 1, but separate
national road and Consultants invoice from DPS1 deadlines
Preliminary estimate
for Environmental
Impact Assessment)
42.3 Additional works for 162500,00 Provisional Delivery and Located in Design
Kohila entrance (Urge Acceptance Certificate section 1, but separate
local road) and Consultants invoice from DPS1 deadlines
42.4 Additional works for 73500,00 Provisional Delivery and Located in Design
Kohila entrance Acceptance Certificate section 1, but separate
(Salutaguse local and Consultants invoice from DPS1 deadlines
road)
42.5 Preliminary estimate 21000,00 Provisional Delivery and Design priority section
for Environmental Acceptance Certificate 2 (Alu-Mälivere)
Impact Assessment and Consultants invoice
12
42.6 Preliminary estimate 14000,00 Provisional Delivery and Design priority section
for Environmental Acceptance Certificate 3 (Kärpla-Alu)
Impact Assessment and Consultants invoice
42.7 Preliminary estimate 3500,00 Provisional Delivery and Design priority section
for Environmental Acceptance Certificate 4 (Selja-Kärpla)
Impact Assessment of and Consultants invoice
DPS4 objects
42.8 Preliminary estimate 7000,00 Provisional Delivery and Design priority section
for Environmental Acceptance Certificate 5 (Tootsi-Selja)
Impact Assessment of and Consultants invoice
DPS5 objects
43.1 Additional works for 151942,82 Provisional Delivery and Design priority section
Kaisma local stop Acceptance Certificate 5 (Tootsi-Selja)
change and Consultants invoice
43.2 Additional design 102439,63 Provisional Delivery and DPS1 BP 05, BP07,
works from LET0041 Acceptance Certificate BP08 and BP09
DG update impact and Consultants invoice
DPS2 BP 14, BP15,
BP16 and BP17
43.3 Additional design 58481,65 Provisional Delivery and DPS1 BP06, DPS4
works from LET0098 Acceptance Certificate BP07 and DPS5 BP01
Blanket layer and Consultants invoice
43.4 Additional design 32461,46 Provisional Delivery and DPS3 BP09, BP10,
works from LET0085 Acceptance Certificate BP11 and BP12
Noise Barriers and Consultants invoice
43.5 Additional design 43719,49 Provisional Delivery and DPS1 BP06, DPS4
works from LET0096 Acceptance Certificate BP07 and DPS5 BP01
Ecoducts changes - and Consultants invoice
Environmental
monitoring
43.6 Additional design 9000,00 Provisional Delivery and Design priority section
works from VO Acceptance Certificate 1 (Kohila)
LET_0120 Platform and Consultants invoice
Height Change
43.7 Additional design 13960,00 Provisional Delivery and Design priority section
works from VO Acceptance Certificate 5 (Tootsi-Selja) BP04
LET_0251 Kaisma and Consultants invoice Aluste-Kergu
stairs (BR1170-OR1170)
43.8 Additional 13580,00 Provisional Delivery and Design priority
remuneration from VO Acceptance Certificate sections 4 and 5 (Selja-
LET_0255 Building and Consultants invoice Kärpla and Tootsi-
Permit Fee Increase Selja
43.9 Descope of VO LET_ -7560,00 Provisional Delivery and Design priority section
KV2024-309 Acceptance Certificate 1 (Kohila) BP11 and
and Consultants invoice BP12
43.10 Descope of VO LET_ -1430,00 Provisional Delivery and Design priority section
KV2024-117 Acceptance Certificate 2 (Alu-Mälivere) BP04
and Consultants invoice and BR1645 of BP05
43.11 Client request of -5940,00 Provisional Delivery and Design priority section
reimbursement of DS1 Acceptance Certificate 1 (Kohila) BP02, 05,
DPS1 Building Permit and Consultants invoice 07, 08 and 09
Fees
13
Total value and impact on the Total Remuneration for the Design Services
Total value of the Design Services Variations under item 2.43 , EUR 709655,05
Additional investigations
1.1.1. Additional investigations per unit price (Geologic survey per method) are regulated
in accordance with this clause and the Agreement. Any Variations in this respect
shall only be considered in cases where there is a change in the Clients Requirements.
No additional investigations costs shall be entertained by the Client in cases of
Consultants unilateral or preferential adjustment in his approach or methodology.
14
2.5 Design Supervision Services
2.5.1 The Implementing Body shall pay to the Consultant for the Design Supervision
Services in proportion to the amount of construction Works performed and
accepted by the Client, in accordance with the below payment schedule for the
Design Supervision Services.
2.5.2 Definitions:
CCW – commencement of construction Works
CW – construction Works
DSS – Design Supervision Services
a – The Remuneration for the CW
b – The amount of performed CW in the corresponding time period (cost of Work
done)
c – The Remuneration for carrying out DSS
Paid in accordance with a progress of construction Evidence /
works (CW) Documentatio
n for Payment
in accordance
DSS payment
Performed with the
schedule Executed vs Contract Payment for
CW price approval
(%) DSS (eur)
(eur) procedures in
the Particular
Conditions
1 CCW+3 (months) B b/a*100 c*(b/a*100) Provisional
Delivery and
Acceptance
Certificate
and
Consultants
invoice
2 CCW+6 (months) B b/a*100 c*(b/a*100) Provisional
Delivery and
Acceptance
Certificate
and
Consultants
invoice
3 CCW+9 (months) B b/a*100 c*(b/a*100) Provisional
Delivery and
Acceptance
Certificate
and
Consultants
invoice
4 CCW+12 (months) B b/a*100 c*(b/a*100) Provisional
Delivery and
Acceptance
Certificate
and
Consultants
invoice
15
5 CCW+15 (months) B b/a*100 c*(b/a*100) Provisional
Delivery and
Acceptance
Certificate
and
Consultants
invoice
6 CCW+18 (months) B b/a*100 c*(b/a*100) Provisional
Delivery and
Acceptance
Certificate
and
Consultants
invoice
7 CCW+21 (months) B b/a*100 c*(b/a*100) Provisional
Delivery and
Acceptance
Certificate
and
Consultants
invoice
8 CCW+24 (months) B b/a*100 c*(b/a*100) Provisional
Delivery and
Acceptance
Certificate
and
Consultants
invoice
9 CCW+27 (months) B b/a*100 c*(b/a*100) Provisional
Delivery and
Acceptance
Certificate
and
Consultants
invoice
10 CCW+30 (months) B b/a*100 c*(b/a*100) Provisional
Delivery and
Acceptance
Certificate
and
Consultants
invoice
11 CCW+33 (months) B b/a*100 c*(b/a*100) Provisional
Delivery and
Acceptance
Certificate
and
Consultants
invoice
12 CCW+36 (months) B b/a*100 c*(b/a*100) Provisional
Delivery and
Acceptance
16
Certificate
and
Consultants
invoice
13 CCW+39 (months) B b/a*100 c*(b/a*100) Provisional
Delivery and
Acceptance
Certificate
and
Consultants
invoice
14 CCW+42 (months) B b/a*100 c*(b/a*100) Provisional
Delivery and
Acceptance
Certificate
and
Consultants
invoice
15 CCW+45 (months) B b/a*100 c*(b/a*100) Provisional
Delivery and
Acceptance
Certificate
and
Consultants
invoice
16 CCW+48 (months) B b/a*100 c*(b/a*100) Provisional
Delivery and
Acceptance
Certificate
and
Consultants
invoice
17 CCW+51 (months) B b/a*100 c*(b/a*100) Provisional
Delivery and
Acceptance
Certificate
and
Consultants
invoice
18 CCW+54 (months) B b/a*100 c*(b/a*100) Provisional
Delivery and
Acceptance
Certificate
and
Consultants
invoice
19 CCW+57 (months) B b/a*100 c*(b/a*100) Provisional
Delivery and
Acceptance
Certificate
and
17
Consultants
invoice
20 CCW+60 (months) B b/a*100 c*(b/a*100) Final Delivery
and
Acceptance
Certificate
and
Consultants
invoice
Total DSS EUR 543474,00 (five hundred forty-three thousand
Remuneration: four hundred seventy-four euro)
18
3 ADVANCE PAYMENT
In case the Parties have agreed to apply Advance Payment, it is stated as “Applies” under item 3.2 in the
below table. In case it is stated under item 3.2 below that Advance Payment “Does not apply” then none of
the Advance Payment clauses in this Agreement apply. If the Advance Payment applies, then the Consultant
shall receive an Advance Payment in accordance with the Agreement and following conditions:
3.5 The total maximum advance 5% of the total Remuneration amount of the Agreement.
payment:
3.6 Advance Payment applied under Does not apply.
this Agreement […] % of the total Remuneration amount of the
Agreement as agreed between the Parties*
3.7 The number and timing of 1, due after provision by the Consultant to the Client of a
instalments guarantee in accordance with the Form of Guarantee for
Advance Payments included in this Appendix.
3.8 Guarantee for Advance Payments The Guarantee for Advance Payments shall be issued by
requirements a bank/insurance company of minimum BB+ rating
according to Standard & Poors, Fitchs, Moodys rating
system.
3.9 Offset against the Payment The Advance Payment shall be set off against payments
Schedule actually made chronologically starting from the first
payment following the Advance Payment, applying the
following requirements, until such time when the
Advance Payment is completely set of off:
1. The value of Advance Payment set off against
each invoice shall be 50% of the total value of
that invoice.
2. Set-off against Consultants issued invoices shall
be applied until such time until the entire value of
Advance Payment has been set off.
The afore mentioned set-off order applies
notwithstanding any other rules and provisions of
withholding/retention//deducting/set-off stipulated in the
Agreement.
3.10 Nature of Advance Payment: Advance Payment shall not be considered as a payment
fulfilling any of the requirements of any deliverables and
Services under the Agreement. The intention of applying
Advance Payment is improved cash flow at the early
stages of the delivery of the Services. In case at any point
in time during the course of delivery of the Services, the
Consultant is in material breach with the Agreement or
the Agreement is suspended or terminated and at such
time any proportion of Advance Payment has not yet been
off-set and is still outstanding, then the Client shall have
the right to request and entitlement to receive back any
such outstanding proportion of the Advance Payment
from the Consultant or the right to request the
indemnification under the Guarantee for Advance
Payment without delay or withhold any such outstanding
proportion of the invoices from the Consultant without
delay and special notification.
19
* In case of any variations that impact the amount of Remuneration paid under this Agreement, the Advance
Payment amount agreed in this clause 3.2 shall not be adjusted and shall remain as stated and agreed at the
time of signing of this Agreement.
20
Form of Guarantee for Advance Payments
Guarantor: [identify bank or financial institution]
Beneficiary: [●].
Date: [●] 2018.
Type of guarantee: Payment guarantee.
Guarantee No: [●].
Underlying Relationship: The agreement between [parties, date of the agreement] and obligations of the
Consultant to fulfil obligations arising from the advance payment in accordance with the terms of the
agreement.
Guarantee Amount: [amount in numbers and words]
Document in support of the demand for payment: Original of the statement issued by the Client.
Language of required documents: English language.
Form and place of presentation: Paper and by courier to the legal address of the Guarantor with a certified
copy to the legal address of the Consultant.
Expiry: [date].
As Guarantor, we hereby irrevocably and unconditionally undertake to pay the Beneficiary any amount up
to the Guarantee Amount upon presentation of the first Clients complying demand, in the form of
presentation indicated above and in any event by the Clients statement, whether in demand itself or in a
separate signed document accompanying or identifying the demands, indicating in what amount the
Consultant is in breach of its obligations under the Underlying relationship. Any demand under this
Guarantee must be received by us on or before Expiry at the place for presentation indicated above. We
further agree that no change or addition to or other modification of the terms of the agreement which may
be made between Client (or the Implementing Body and the Consultant), shall in any way release us from
any liability under this guarantee, and we hereby waive notice of any such change, addition or modification.
We hereby also waive any options, possibilities or rights to reject or suspend the Clients demand if it is
issued in accordance with the form and place of presentation mentioned above. The Client shall not be
obliged to justify his demand. The Guarantor has undertaken obligations with respect to the Client only,
therefore the guarantee is not transferable or shall not be pledged. The Guarantor has been notified that the
Client may require the Consultant to extend the guarantee.
Disputes and Applicable law: This Guarantee is subject to the law applicable in accordance with the
Agreement and dispute resolution proceedings pursuant to the Agreement (adjudication; arbitration). For
issues not mentioned herewith the guarantee shall be regulated by the ICC Uniform Rules for Demand
Guarantees URDG 758. This guarantee shall remain valid and in full effect from the date of the advance
payment under the agreement until the full repayment of the same amount from the Consultant.
Yours truly,
Signature and Seal
Name of Bank/Financial Institution
Address
Date
21
THIS DOCUMENT IS SIGNED ELECTRONICALLY WITH A QUALIFIED ELECTRONIC
SIGNATURE
AND CONTAINS A TIME STAMP
22
HANKELEPINGU MUUTMISE OTSUS E ETTEPANEK 1 Lepingu nr ja sõlmimise kuupäev : 8/2019/EE-2 29.03.2019 Töövõtja nimi ja registrikood: IDOM, CONSULTING, ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURE S.A.U. Registrikood A4 8283964 Lepingu nimetus: Design and design supervision services for the construction of the new line from Pärnu to Rapla Riigihanke viitenumber /RBE hankenumber : RBR 2017/27 Projekt: D.003 DTD1 Lisakood: D*.003.01 Tühistada 22.10.2024 juhatuse poolt heakskiidetud hankepeingu 8/2019/EE-2 muutmise otsuse ettepanek ning esitada see uuesti juhatusele heakskiitmiseks alljärgnevalt: Muudatuse sisu : 1. Kaisma kohaliku peatuse juurde riigiteelt nr 58 Aluste-Kergu trepistiku projekteerimine. Lisatöö hõlmab riigiteel 58 asuva Viluvere viadukti idapoolsel muldkehal oleva Kaisma jaama viiva trepistiku projekteerimist põhiprojekti tasemel . Töö sisaldab trepi mudel leerimist , tugiseinte kand vus -ja püsivusarvutusi , kululoendit ja eelarvet jm. 2. DS1 kohalike peatuste platvormide ühtlustami ne kõrgusele 760mm. Algse lepingu kohaselt anti projekteerijale suunis kasutada n ominaalset reisijate platvormide kõrgust 550 mm. Pärast projekteerimise algust , tulenevalt Euroopa Komisjoni liikuvuse ja transpordi peadirektoraadi kirjast, ühtlustati reisijate platvormide kõrgus kogu Rail Baltica trassil ning Poolas ja Saksamaal – ühtlane k õrgus tagab parimad ja ohutuimad liikumisvõimalused liikumispuuetega reisijatele. Töö sisaldab raportite, jooniste ja mudelite korrigeerimist Kohila jaamas ning parandusi „Gabariidiuuring ja platvormide nihke arvutused“ ( Gauge study ). 3. Alates 01/01/2024 kallines ehitusloa taotluse riigilõiv . Töövõtja esitas r audteelõikude RW1400 ja RW1500 ehitusloataotlused pärast lõivu kallinemis t ja vastavalt lepingu eritingimustele on riikl ikest seadusmuudatustest tulenevad tööde kallinemised Tellija kanda. 4. IDOM tööde mahust arvatakse välja DS1 DPS1 Kohila liiklussõlmega (BP11 ja BP12) seonduvad tegemata tööd. Tegemata töödeks on hankimata ehitusload ning osad sisseviimata tehnilised kommentaarid. 5 . IDOM tööde mahust arvatakse välja DS1 DPS2 Pureva ja Röa rajatistega (BP04 ja BP05) seonduvad tegemata tööd. Tegemata töödeks on hankimata ehitusload. 6 . IDOM kohustustest arvestatakse tagasi Rail Baltic Estonia poolt makstud riigilõivud seoses DS1 DPS1 ehitusloaga. Muudatuse põhjendus: 1. Lepingu täitmise käigus muutus Kaisma peatuse asukoht. P arema ligipääsu tagamiseks jalakäijatele projek t eerida Viluvere viaduktilt Kaisma jaama suundu v trepistik põhiprojektile vastavas täpsusastmes . Trepistiku projekteerimisele tuleb juhindu da lisaks Lepingule ja selle lisadele ka kehtivatest õigusaktidest, eeskirjadest, standarditest ning vajadusel muudest vastava valdkonna tehnilistest dokumentidest. Seoses nimetatud lisatööga muuta vastavalt alltoodud l epingu lisasid : Appendix 3: Programme Appendix 4: Remuneration and Payment. 2. Lepingu Tehnilise kirjelduse p 1.4.1 kohaselt kohustus töövõtja lähtuma Rail Baltica Design Guidelines -ist ( sh RBDG-MAN-025-0101) , mille kohaselt reisijate platvormide kõrguseks oli 550mm. UIC741 järgi on lubatud nii 550 kui ka 760, projekteerijal paluti lähtuda kõrgusest 550. 08.12.2021 saatis MKM kirja 24.5-6/21-0070/7306 RB Railile ja RBE-le andes juhised koheselt muuta kõikide platvormide kõrguseks 760mm. MKM juhis tulenes Euroopa Komisjoni liikuvuse ja transpordi peadirektoraadi 23.11.2021 kirjast MOVE.DDG1.B.1/JS(2021)7934812 pärast TEN-T osapooltega konsulteerimist. Ühtlane platvormi kõrgus tagab paremad võimalused liikumispuuetega reisijatele , kuna vä lditakse eritasapinnalisust rongi uste ning platvormi vahel. Sarnaselt tegutseti kogu Baltikumis ning ka Poolas ja Saksamaal ja kõik platvormid (v.a ökodukti sisesed) viidi nominaalsele kõrgusele 760mm. Eelnevast tulenevalt projekteerib töövõtja reisijate platvormid (Kohila, Rapla, Järvakandi ja Kaisma) ümber nominaalsele kõrgusele 760mm. Seoses sellega muuta lepingu lisasid Appendix 3: Programme ja Appendix 4: Remuneration and Payment. Seoses nimetatud lisatööga muuta vastavalt alltoodud lepingu lisasid: Appendix 3: Programme Appendix 4: Remuneration and Payment. Design Guideline RBDG-MAN-025 , punkt 1.1 (muudeti 06.12.2021) 3. Enne 01/01/2024 kehtiv a Riigilõivuseadus e (§ 215 9 ) järgi oli raudteerajatise ehitusloa taotluse läbivaatamise riigilõiv 30 eurot . Pärast 01/01/2024 esitatud taotlused p eavad, aga maksma 60 eurot raudteeületuskoha, raudteeületuskoha automaatse foorisignalisatsiooni ja truubi ehituse puhul ning 250 eurot elektritsentralisatsiooni, rongiliikluse juhtimissüsteemide, kontaktvõrgu, veoalajaama, rööbastee, raudteesilla, -viadukti, -tunneli ning jalakäijate tunneli, oote- või laadimisplatvormi ja muude raudtee sihtotstarbeliseks kasutamiseks vajalike rajatiste ehituse puhul. Seetõttu oli DPS4 taotlus 7 730,00 euro ja DPS5 taotlus 5 850,00 euro võrra kallim. Muudatuse aluseks on lepingu põhitingimuste artikkel 1 punkt 5 ning selle viide FIDIC Valg e raamatu punkti 1.5 Changes in Legislation alampunkt idele 1.5.1 ja 1.5.2. 4.Projekteerimistööde käigus ei täitnud IDOM kõiki oma projekteerimisega seotud kohustusi. Hilinemised muutusid pikaks ning RBE otsustas, et IDOMi tööd jätkab ehitaja projekteerija. Sellest tulenevalt paluti IDOMil tööd lõpetada. Projekti ülevaatamisega koguti kokku märkused, mida IDOM sisse viia ei jõudnud ning arvestati kokku ka ehituslubade menetlusest tulenevad kulud. Projektijuht ning IDOM projektijuht on kokku leppinud mahaarvata summa. Ajalist pikendust/lühendust sellele tööle ei määrata. Seoses nimetatud lisatööga muuta vastavalt alltoodud lepingu lisasid: Appendix 4: Remuneration and Payment. Technical Specification chapter 2.8. 5 . Projekteerimistööde käigus selgus, et IDOM ei jõua lõpuni viia ehituslubasid, mis on seotud DPS2 BP04 ja BP05 rajatistega. IDOM hankis ehitusloa vaid ühele Röa ökoduktile ehk poolele pakist BP05. Sellest tulenevalt arvatakse IDOM tööde mahust välja BP04 ja BP05 BR 1645 ehituslubade taotlemine. Projektijuht ning IDOM projektijuht on kokku leppinud mahaarvatava summa. Ajalist pikendust/lühendust sellele tööle ei määrata. Seoses nimetatud lisatööga muuta vastavalt alltoodud lepingu lisasid: Appendix 4: Remuneration and Payment. Technical Specification chapter 2.8. 6 . IDOM ei nõustunud maksma DS1 DPS1 ehituslubade riigilõivusid, sest IDOM alltöövõtjal (SKPK) oli pooleli vaidlus TTJA-ga riigilõivude suuruse osas. Arvestades, et viivitamine mõjutas niigi kriitilises seisus olevat ehitusloa väljastamist, otsustas RBE maksta riigilõivu ning selle hiljem IDOMilt tagasi nõuda. Projektijuht ning IDOM projektijuht on jõudnud vastastikulisele arusaamale, et tegemist oli IDOM kohustusega ning RBE-l on õigus makstud summa tagasi nõuda. Ajalist mõju selles lepingumuudatuse osas ei rakendata. Seoses nimetatud lisatööga muuta vastavalt alltoodud lepingu lisasid: Appendix 4: Remuneration and Payment. Technical Specification chapter 2.8. Mõju hankelepingu maksumusele : Sõlmitud hankelepingu maksumus on 6 802 522,00 eurot, millelel lisandub käibemaks. RHS § 123 lg 1 p 1 alusel varem muudatusi tehtud ei ole, varasemalt on sõlmitud muudatusi muudel õiguslikel alustel. Käesoleva muudatuse tulemusel suureneb ja väheneb hankelepingu maksumus järgmiselt: 1. s uureneb 13 960,00 € , millele lisandub käibemaks ; 2. s uureneb 9 000,00 €, millele lisandub käibemaks ; 3. s uureneb 13 580,00 €, millele lisandub käibemaks ; 4. v äheneb 7 560,00 €, millele lisandub käibemaks ; 5 . v äheneb 1 430,00 €, millele lisandub käibemaks ; 6 . v äheneb 5 940,00 €, millele lisandub käibemaks . Hankeleping suureneb 36 540 euro võrra, millele lisandub käibemaks ning väheneb 14 930 euro võrra, millele lisandub käibemaks Muudatuse väärtus kokku on 51 470,00 eurot, millele lisandub käibemaks. See moodustab sõlmitud hankelepingu esialgsest maksumusest 0,7 6 % . Muudel õiguslikel alustel on varasemalt hankelepingu muudatusi sõlmitud 350 919,55 euro ulatuses, millele lisandub käibemaks. Pärast käesoleva muudatuse sõlmimist on hankelepingu maksumuseks 6 802 522,00 + 350 919,55 + 36 540 - 14 930 = 7 175 051,55 eurot , millele lisandub seadusest tulenev käibemaks. Käesolev muudatus rahastatakse CEF1 vahenditest . Mõju hankelepingu täitmise tähtajale: 1. Lisatöö teostmise tähtaeg on 3 kuud , pikendus laieneb ka tööprojektile . V astavalt lepingu lisale 3 (Appendix 3) saab DPS 5 BP-05 Viluvere (BR1780) (CWP 3) uueks põhiprojekti tähtajaks 31 kuud pärast lepingu algust ning tööprojekti DPS 5 BP-05 Viluvere (BR1780) (CWP 5) tähtajaks 34 kuud pärast lepingu algust. 2. Lisatöö teostamise tähtaeg on 1,25 kuud , pikendus laieneb ka tööprojektile . V astavalt lepingu lisale 3 (Appendix 3) saab DPS 1 BP-07 - Railway line section Kohila - Harju county (CWP 1) uueks põhiprojekti tähtajaks 31.12.2020 ning tööprojekti DPS 1 BP-07 - Railway line section Kohila Station – Harju county (CWP 4) tähtajaks 23,5 kuud pärast lepingu algust. 3 .-6 . Puudub m õju hankelepingu täitmise tähtajale. Muudatuse alus vastavalt RHS -le ja põhjendus : RHS § 123 lg 1 p 1 /Latvian PPL art 61 lg 1 p 3 ja lg 5 . Riigihangete seaduse § 123 lg 1 p 1 kohaselt on õigus sõlmitud hankelepingut muuta uut riigihanget korraldamata, kui hankelepingu üldist olemust, näiteks hankelepingu eset, ei muudeta ja muudatuse väärtus ei ületa riigihangete seaduse § 14 lõikes 3 või 4 sätestatud piirmäära ning muudatuste väärtus kokku ei ületa 1 0 protsenti asjade või teenuste hankelepingu algsest maksumusest. Muudatus on vajalik Lepinguga seatud eesmärkide saavutamiseks ja Töö nõuetekohaseks teostamiseks. Muudatusega ei muudeta Lepingu üldist olemust, kuivõrd Lepingu esemeks oleva töö olemus ei muutu. Muudatuse tulemusena teostab Töövõtja lisatöö – projekteerib trepistiku jalakäijatele parema juurdepääsu tagamiseks Kaisma kohalikule peatusele ning muudab reisijaplatvormide kõrgust 550mm 760mm-ni t agamaks paremad liikumisvõimalused liikumispuuetega reisijatele . Muudatusega punktidega 4 ja 5 jäetakse lepingu mahust välja ehituslubade taotlemine, mis taotletakse teise lepingu mahus. Vastutav isik : Nooremproj ektijuht Justus Allemann Eelarves arvestatud: Jah Rahastamisallikas: CEF 1 CEF tegevuse number: A12 Lepingu muudatuse sõlmimise eeldatav aeg: 29.11.2024 Nõukogu heakskiit lepingu muutmisele : Jah Täiendavad asjaolud: FORMTEXT [ ] Kooskõlastatud: Hankeüksuse juht Liisi Heiskonen /allkirjastatud digitaalselt/ Vastutav isik Justus Allemann /allkirjastatud digitaalselt/ Finantskontrolör Kärt Peetrimäe /allkirjastatud digitaalselt/ Jurist Kaidi Sulg /allkirjastatud digitaalselt/
Teema: FW: Hankelepingu nr 82019EE-2 muudatuse kooskõlastamine
From: RBE hanked <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 2:34 PM
To: Ingrid Jakobson <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >; TTJA <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >
Cc: Liisi Heiskonen <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >
Subject: Hankelepingu nr 82019EE-2 muudatuse kooskõlastamine
Tere
Edastame kooskõlastamiseks hankelepingu nr 82019EE-2 „Design and design supervision services for the construction of the new line from Pärnu to Rapla” muudatuse.
Dokument on manuses.
Allkirjastatud dokument palun saata
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> ja
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> e-posti aadressidele.
Lugupidamisega!
Johanna-Liisa Mölder
Hankespetsialist/Procurement Specialist
Rail Baltic Estonia OÜ
Veskiposti tn 2, Tallinn
Tel: +372 5713 1500
E-mail:
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]>
www.rbestonia.ee <http://www.rbestonia.ee/>
---
Kiri on saadetud väljastpoolt valitsemisala. Ärge avage kirjaga kaasa tulnud linke või manuseid enne, kui olete saatja õigsuses ja sisu turvalisuses kindel.