Sissetulev kiriAvalik
Selgitustaotlus
Andmekaitse Inspektsioon · 3. veebruar 2026
- Viit
- 2.2-9/26/445-1
- Registreeritud
- 3. veebruar 2026
- Dokumendi liik
- Sissetulev kiri
- Adressaat
- GDPR.PL
- Saabumis/saatmisviis
- e-post
- Funktsioon
- 2.2 Loa- ja teavitamismenetlused
- Sari
- 2.2-9 Selgitustaotlused
- Toimik
- 2.2-9/2026
- Vastutaja
- Kirsika Nigul (Andmekaitse Inspektsioon, Euroopa koostöö ja õiguse valdkond)
- Lahendamise tähtaeg
- 10. veebruar 2026
Failid
Sisu (failidest)
Saatja: "redakcja portalu GDPR" <[email protected]>
Saaja: "info - AKI" <[email protected]>
Teema: GDPR.pl - Request for answers to questions
Kuupäev: 2026-02-03 11:04
Tähelepanu! Tegemist on välisvõrgust saabunud kirjaga.
Tundmatu saatja korral palume linke ja faile mitte avada.
Dear Sirs,
As the GDPR.PL portal, we would like to ask you to present your opinions and
previous experiences in the field of artificial intelligence and codes of
conduct.
The GDPR.PL is the oldest and the largest portal dedicated to personal data
protection in Poland. Our mission is to provide reliable information to
citizens, entrepreneurs and public entities. Thus, we would like to learn
the positions on this topic of supervisory authorities from across the EU
and prepare the article.
Given the above, we will be grateful if you could answer the following
questions:
Have any codes of conduct been approved in your country pursuant to Article
40 of the GDPR?
If so, could you please indicate:
• the names of the codes and their authors,
• the industries/sectors they apply to,
• what the authors of these codes find the most challenging?
We would also appreciate information on how many codes are currently in the
process of being adopted and which industries they relate to.
We would also appreciate information on how many codes are currently in the
process of being adopted and which industries they relate to.
Have any legal regulations concerning artificial intelligence been adopted
in national legislation?
* In particular, we are interested in issues such as deepfakes, hate speech,
or special protection of children in this area.
* If such regulations have not been introduced, are any planned?
* Is or will there be a specific role foreseen for the supervisory authority
in this field?
* As a supervisory authority, do you anticipate issuing any guidance
materials in the area of AI, deepfakes, hate speech, or child protection
that could support the work of Data Protection Officers (DPOs) and other
professionals responsible for data protection?
We will be very grateful for a quick response. Thank you kindly in advance.
Agnieszka Rzycka - Osiej
Editor-in-chief
of the GDPR.PL website.
355 Grochowska Street
03-822 Warsaw (Poland)
e-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>