Riigihangete vaidlustuskomisjon/Estonian Public Procurement Review Board (VAKO)
E-post:
[email protected]
Tartu mnt 85, Tallinn, Harju maakond, 10115
Kaebus/Complaint
2025.11.14
Kaebaja/Complainant
JSC Airstiga
305254094
Mažeikių str.73, Juodeikių vil., Mažeikių reg, LT-89453
Rūta Draugšienė,
[email protected]
Hankija/Contracting Authority
Riigi Kaitseinvesteeringute Keskus (70009764)
Postiaadress: Järve tn 34a
Linn: Tallinn
Sihtnumber: 11314
Hanke andmed/Procurement Information
Hanke nimetus/ Tender title: Lennuraja jäätõrje graanulid
Hanke viitenumber/ Tender number: 301572
Menetluse liik/ Procedure type: Piiratud hankemenetlus (Dünaamilise hankesüsteemiga
nr 280448 seotud hange)
Otsuse kuupäev/ Award decision date: 10.11.2025
1. Kaebuse õiguslik alus/Legal Basis
Käesolev kaebus on esitatud vastavalt Riigihangete seadusele (RT I, 12.07.2025, 25; jõust.
01.10.2025), eelkõige selle § 3 lõikele 1, § 47 lõikele 1, § 114 lõigetele 1 ja 2 ning § 185./This
complaint is submitted under the Public Procurement Act (RT I, 12.07.2025, 25; entry into
force 01.10.2025), in particular Sections 3(1), 47(1), 114(1–2) and 185.
1.1. § 3 lg 1 / § 3(1): Hankija peab kohtlema kõiki pakkujaid võrdselt ja läbipaistvalt. /
The contracting authority must treat all economic operators equally and act
transparently.
1.2. § 47 lg 1 / § 47(1): Pakkumus peab täielikult vastama riigihanke alusdokumentides
esitatud tingimustele. / The tender must fully comply with the conditions set out in
the procurement documents.
1.3. § 114 lg 1 ja 2 / § 114(1–2): Hankija kontrollib pakkumuste vastavust ja lükkab tagasi
pakkumuse, mis ei vasta hankedokumentide tingimustele. / The contracting
authority shall verify the conformity of tenders and reject any tender that does not
meet the requirements.
2. Kaebuse sisu/Subject of the Complaint
Kaebaja palub tunnistada kehtetuks hankija otsuse, millega tunnistati edukaks
pakkumus, mis ei vastanud riigihanke alusdokumentides esitatud nõuetele./The
complainant requests the annulment of the award decision by which a tender that did not
comply with the procurement requirements was declared successful.
3. Põhjendus/Grounds of the Complaint
Kaebaja osales nimetatud riigihankes ning esitas oma pakkumuse vastavalt
hankedokumentides sätestatud juhistele. Hankes osales kaks pakkujat. Edukaks
tunnistatud pakkuja sisestas ühikuhinna kolme (3) kümnendkohaga, ehkki hankes oli
selgesõnaliselt nõutud, et hind tuleb esitada kuni kahe (2) kümnendkohaga./The
complainant participated in the above-mentioned public procurement and submitted its
offer in accordance with the instructions of the contracting authority. Two bidders
participated. The awarded tenderer entered the unit price using three (3) decimal places,
although the tender documentation explicitly required the price to be entered with a
maximum of two (2) decimal places.
Selline kõrvalekalle ei ole pelgalt tehniline viga, vaid kujutab endast formaalset
mittevastavust riigihanke alusdokumentide tingimustele. Nimetatud erinevus mõjutab
pakkumuste võrreldavust ning rikub RHS § 3 lõikes 1 sätestatud võrdse kohtlemise
põhimõtet./Such a deviation is not a mere technical error but constitutes a formal non-
compliance with the procurement documentation. The discrepancy affects the
comparability of tenders and violates the principle of equal treatment set out in Section
3(1) of the Act.
Kaebaja teavitas hankijat rikkumisest kohe pärast tulemuste teatavakstegemist, kuid
hankija ei andnud vastust ega selgitust enne lepingu sõlmimist. See on vastuolus RHS §
114 lõigete 1 ja 2 kohustusega kontrollida pakkumuste vastavust ja teha põhjendatud
kirjalik otsus./The complainant notified the contracting authority of the non-compliance
immediately after being informed of the results, but the authority failed to respond or
provide clarification before concluding the contract. This is contrary to the obligation
under Sections 114(1–2) to verify the conformity of tenders and to issue a reasoned
written decision.
4. Taotlus/ Request
Kaebaja palub Riigihangete vaidlustuskomisjonil:
Tunnistada kehtetuks hankija otsus, millega tunnistati edukaks pakkumus, mis ei
vastanud RHS § 114 lõigete 1 ja 2 nõuetele;
Kohustada hankijat hindama pakkumusi uuesti kooskõlas RHS §-dega 3, 47 ja 114;
Peatada hankelepingu sõlmimine või täitmine kuni vaidlustusmenetluse lõpuni./The
complainant requests that the Public Procurement Review Board (VAKO):
Annul the contracting authority’s award decision declaring a tender non-compliant under
Sections 114(1–2) successful;
Require the contracting authority to re-evaluate tenders in accordance with Sections 3,
47 and 114 of the Act;
Suspend the conclusion or performance of the procurement contract until the
completion of this review.
5. Tõendid ja lisad/Evidence and Attachments
1.Kuva nõudest „kuni kaks kümnendkohta“ (hankedokumendid);
2.Kuva edukast pakkumusest kolme kümnendkohaga hinnaga;
3.Tulemuste teavituskiri;
4.Kaebaja pöördumine hankija poole ja vastuse puudumine.
5.Volikiri R. Draugšienė
1.Price form with condition of 2 decimals (procurement document)(Pdf);
2.Screenshot showing the awarded tender with three decimal places;
3.Notification of results(regarding contract award(screenshot);
4.Correspondence sent to the contracting authority(CA) and absence of
reply.(screenshot)
5.PoA R.Draugšienė
6. Kinnitused/Declaration
Kinnitan, et esitatud andmed on õiged ja täielikud ning palun Riigihangete
vaidlustuskomisjonil läbi vaadata kaebus kooskõlas RHS 13. peatükiga (§ 185).
I hereby declare that the information provided is true and complete and request the Public
Procurement Review Board to review the complaint in accordance with Chapter 13 (§ 185)
of the Public Procurement Act.
Koht/Place : Mažeikiai ,Lithuania
Kuupäev/Date: 2025.11.14
Nimi/name, ametikoht/position: Rūta Draugšienė , Manager
Allkiri/signature
Kontaktandmed/Contact data:
[email protected], Tel.: +37068077234
Dokumentą elektroniniu parašu
pasirašė RŪTA DRAUGŠIENĖ
Data: 2025-11-14 15:10:13
Dokumentą elektroniniu parašu
pasirašė RŪTA DRAUGŠIENĖ
Data: 2025-10-30 08:46:00
Annex 3
to the Public Contract
Scope of Supply “Runway de-icing granules)”
Runway de-icing granuls (reference number 301572)
Name of the tenderer: JSC Airstiga
Registry code: 305254094
Cost of one kilogram (kg) Total cost (excl. VAT) in
Buyer Goods Unit (kg) Unit (kg)
(excl. VAT) in EUR EUR
Mandatory buy-out quantity 1 200,000 258,000.00 €
Estonian Defence Forces
Additional buy-out quantitiy 1 200,000 258,000.00 €
1.29 €
Aktsiaselts Tallinna Mandatory buy-out quantity 1 40,000 51,600.00 €
Lennujaam Additional buy-out quantitiy 1 80,000 103,200.00 €
1) The tenderer fills in all the yellow fields and transfers the value of the yellow cell (D9) to the Public Procurement Register’s
evaluation criteria form. Enter the unit price in the yellow cell without VAT and at most 2 decimal places.
2) The unit price of goods offered in the related procurement (Annex 3) is fixed in the contract for a minimum of 12 (twelve) months
and includes all costs necessary for selling the goods, including transport to the locations of the buyer.
3) The price is calculated in euros.
1/2
2/2
AIRSTIGA
Closed joint-stock company, Mažeikių str. 73, Juodeikių vill., Mažeikių dstr., LT-89453,
tel. (8 680)77234,fax (8 443) 35462, e-mail:
[email protected]
Data is collected and stored in the Register of Legal Entities, code 305254094
POWER OF ATTORNEY
TO REPRESENT THE COMPANY
2024-12-11
Mažeikiai
I, Ilona Preibienė, Director of JSC „Airstiga“ authorize the Manager of JSC
„Airstiga“ Rūta Draugšienė to represent the interests of the company by participating in
Public procurement and and other open tenders.
The power of attorney covers all activities related to applying the offer, it is:
• the right to provide, to sign, to provide an explanation in relation to the offer and other
related to the participation in public procurement procedures;
• the right to sign the questions when clarifying the terms of the contract;
• the right to sigh the offer;
• the right to certify the copies as true;
• the right to participate in auctions and other negotiation processes;
• the right to negotiate the terms of the contract in proceeding actions.
The Power of Attorney is valid until 2025-12-31
Director Ilona Preibienė