Pöördumine

WHO BCI Community of Practice meeting 9 December 2024 Agenda 1. General updates • WHO updates • Updates from BCI FPs 2. Reflections on RC74 and considerations on EPW2 • Updates from Robb Butler, Director Communicable Diseases, Environment and Health • Discussion 3. Next year’s status reporting by Member States • Introduction to next year’s reporting • Process reflections from Serbia and Wales • Q&A 4. Any other business Updates from the BCI Unit Updates from BCI FPs Reflections on RC74 and considerations on EPW2 Next year’s reporting Commitment by all Member States “Calls on Member States (..) to report to WHO on the monitoring indicators and progress measures of the action framework in line with the reporting timelines” Link: Resolution Country reporting on progress Focal Points have a facilitator role ˃ Collect input from other institutions and colleagues • send them an early warning email now • organize (online) briefings • invite to a stakeholder meeting • share the reporting guidelines and other materials (what do you need?) ˃ An opportunity to establish links and strengthen relations with colleagues who conduct BCI-related work Reporting in 2025 (for 2023-2024) Letter from Robb Butler early Jan Also requesting the appointment of new BCI FPs Open clinic meetings will be organized by the WHO/BCI Unit 29 Jan/11 Feb 2025 (ENG) + 31 Jan (RUS) To share with your colleagues: Word version of online reporting form Short briefing doc What else? 9 Reporting in 2025 (for 2023-2024) Progress model is available in Word (https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/361651) And included as an Annex in the Action framework 2022-2027 Page 16 onwards 10 What to include? • conducting or commissioning qualitative or quantitative studies and research to explore local and global barriers and drivers to specific Work that seeks to health behaviours; ✓explore the individual and • engaging affected individuals and communities to explore contextual factors that affect health community-specific barriers and drivers to specific health behaviours behaviours; ✓use local and global insights and • designing new, or improving existing, policy, service or evidence to improve policies, services communication targeting health behaviours, through systematically and communication targeting health applying local and global evidence; behaviours, making them more evidence-based, people-centred and • evaluating insights-informed policy, service or communication culturally informed targeting health behaviours – as part of a pilot before wider roll-out, using appropriate rigorous methods; ✓and evaluate these interventions for impact and acceptability. • longer-term, evaluating the outcomes and cost-effectiveness of interventions that sought to address health behaviours, using appropriate rigorous methods. 11  Scope of reporting to WHO Actions implemented by national and sub-national authorities and • NO: Research study conduted by an academic institution and not shared or used by public public health institutions, including health authorities/institutions actions implemented in collaboration with external • YES: Research study conducted by an academic stakeholders. group and funded by public health authorities/institutions Not included in reporting: • YES: Research study conducted by an academic Work conducted independently by group and shared with and used by public external stakeholders such as health authorities/institutions nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), academic institutions or private entities in the country. 12 Scope of reporting to WHO Work in 2023 and 2024 Work initiated before or completed after 2023-2024 are included. 13 Reporting conducted online in ENG or RUS 14 Reporting framework 15 Qualitative self-assessment Quantitative indicators 10-Dec-24 16  Self-assessment scale: Little awareness –> wide recognition 1 During the year, there was little awareness of BCI for better SC1: Build understanding and health among key stakeholders. support of BCI among key 2 There was some degree of awareness and recognition of BCI stakeholders for better health among some key stakeholders. • Use the resolution to increase the visibility and 3 There was widespread awareness and recognition of BCI for prioritization of BCI. better health among key stakeholders, and some • Communicate and disseminate information and collaboration was initiated. case stories, findings, lessons, tools and other resources. 4 BCI for better health was recognized and supported among • Develop mechanisms for coordination, collaboration many key internal and external stakeholders and across and support. E.g. advisory group, formal network for various health areas, academia and civil society, and several internal and external stakeholders, working groups. projects were done in collaboration. • Invite relevant stakeholders to collaborate on joint 5 BCI for better health was widely recognized and supported projects or offer support in adding a BCI lens to their work. among key internal and external stakeholders and across various health areas, academia and civil society, and • Key stakeholders include policy- and decision- collaboration ensured the application of a BCI lens to all makers, public health managers, local governments, relevant projects. civil society, health workers, academia, and many more Do you have a dedicated formal network of Quantitative reporting: internal and external stakeholders that includes the application of BCI for health in their terms of reference? Y/N 17  No studies –> systematic exploration of Self-assessment scale: barriers and drivers to health behaviours 1 During the year, no studies were conducted to explore SC2: Conduct BCI research barriers and drivers to health behaviours. 2 One or few single studies were conducted to explore barriers and drivers to health behaviours. Please list the studies • Synthesize existing evidence to produce literature reviews or briefs on factors that prevent or drive conducted. health behaviours, and on the impact of interventions 3 Several studies were conducted to explore barriers and to improve health behaviours. drivers to health behaviours, but not for many relevant • Conduct national or local studies on factors that prevent or drive health behaviours in the general health areas. Please list the studies conducted. population or in priority population groups, using qualitative and quantitative methods. 4 Methodologically sound approaches to exploring barriers and • Conduct experiments, trials or multicomponent drivers to health behaviours were applied and studies were action research projects to evaluate the impact of undertaken across many relevant health areas. Please list evidence-informed interventions, in specific contexts and with specific population groups. examples of the studies conducted. • Supplement the above by exploring ways to engage 5 Methodologically sound approaches to exploring barriers and with and listen to those whose voices are often not drivers to health behaviours were applied in a systematic heard, and by acquiring data from other sectors that affect health-related behaviours, including those manner and studies were undertaken across all relevant related to education, housing, social services, culture, health areas. Please list examples of the studies conducted. employment, migration and more. Have you conducted at least one impact Quantitative reporting: evaluation using randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi- experimental methods to assess the impact of an activity that 18 aimed to enhance positive health behaviours? Y/N  No application of BCI –> systematic application Self-assessment scale: SC3: Apply BCI to improve across health areas outcomes of health-related 1 During the year, no BCI approaches were used to inform and policies, services and improve health-related policies, services and communication communication processes, and it was not generally encouraged. 2 Using BCI approaches to inform and improve health-related • Systematically apply a BCI lens to health-related policies, services and communication processes was generally policy, service and communication design appreciated as important but was not implemented. processes, by using BCI approaches and guides as well as involving BCI experts and engaging relevant 3 BCI approaches were occasionally used to inform and improve population groups in scoping and design. health-related policies, services and communication processes. • Monitor and evaluate BCI-informed interventions Please briefly list examples. to understand their broader impact through appropriate frameworks, such as collection of data 4 BCI approaches were widely used to inform and improve health- and feedback from those involved and affected. related policies, services and communication processes across • Where findings from impact evaluations show that specific health-related policy, service or many relevant health areas. Please briefly list examples. communication interventions positively affect 5 BCI approaches were systematically used to inform and improve health behaviours, scale these up to reach more people while tailoring to new contexts, or replicate health-related policies, services and communication processes, them in other policy domains. and the process was formalized with applications across all relevant health areas. Please briefly list examples. 19  No dedicated funding or people –> multiyear Self-assessment scale: budgets and trained staff across health areas 1 During the year, no dedicated funding or people were available SC4: Commit human and for BCI work for better health. financial resources for BCI 2 Limited funding and people were available for BCI work for and ensure their better health, but only on an ad hoc basis and related to specific, sustainability one-time individual projects. Please list examples. • As relevant to the context, establish a dedicated BCI team, embed BCI experts in technical units, or establish 3 Some dedicated funding and people were available for the a cross-programmatic BCI coordination group. structured application of BCI work for some health areas; • Ensure that expert staff with advanced skills, experience however, the level of resources was not sufficient for systematic and expertise are available to apply BCI evidence to health and translate these insights into strengthened application across many health areas. Please list examples. health policies, services and communication. 4 A larger amount of dedicated funding and appropriately trained • Develop sustainable institutional capacity and people were available for continued application of BCI work for capability to apply BCI for health, including through upskilling of staff in different sectors, allowing non-BCI more health areas; however, the level of resources was not experts to apply basic BCI principles, and engaging BCI sufficient for a systematic application across all priority health experts to address complex issues, and increasing opportunities for collaboration with scientific areas. Please describe the resources available. institutions, fellowships or internships for BCI-focused 5 Substantial dedicated, multiyear budgets and appropriately roles. • Allocate dedicated financial resources to allow trained people were available for a continued systematic sustainable delivery or commissioning of BCI work. application of BCI across all priority health areas. Please describe resources available. 20  BCI not integrated in specific health-area plans Self-assessment scale: –> BCI integrated in all specific health-area plans ISC5: mplement strategic 1 During the year, BCI work was not mentioned in any plan(s) for the application of strategies/plans related to specific health topics. BCI for better health 2 Some strategies/plans referred to BCI work, but with no clear • Having a dedicated national strategy or plan for identification of how this work will be conducted, by whom or the application of BCI for health, with a vision, targets and identification of priority actions and with which target. Please attach strategies/plans. resources. 3 Some strategies/plans made an explicit reference to BCI work and • Integrate BCI work into national, regional and identified related actions and targets. Please attach local work programmes, into government, ministry or health agency plans, and national or strategies/plans. local health plans, development plans and/or 4 Within several priority health areas, strategies/plans made an other key strategic documents. Include targets and identification of priority actions and explicit commitment to BCI work and identified related actions resources for implementation. and targets. Please attach examples of strategies/plans. • Include commitments to conduct BCI work in 5 Across all priority health areas, strategies/plans included a strategies and plans related to specific health topics (such as antimicrobial resistance, dedicated section on how BCI work should be used to reach immunization, obesity, alcohol, nutrition, use of health targets, and clearly identified actions, targets, roles and health services, quality of care, health inequalities, health emergencies, air pollution). responsibilities, and resources for this work. Please attach Commitment in this regard includes identification of priority actions and resources for examples of strategies/plans. implementation. Do you have a dedicated national strategy or plan Quantitative reporting: across health areas for the application of BCI for better health? Y/N21 Quantitative indicators and targets - for 2025-26, reported in 2027 Number of MS with a dedicated formal network of internal and external stakeholders that includes the application of BCI for health in their terms of reference: 40 [75%] Number of MS that have conducted at least one impact evaluation using randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-experimental methods to assess the impact of an activity that aimed to enhance positive health behaviours: 40 [75%] Number of MS with a dedicated national strategy or plan across health areas for the application of BCI for better health: 20 [38%] Self-assessment targets - for 2025-26, reported in 2027 • Number of Member States that self-assess at Level 3 or higher within each strategic commitments: 45 [85%] • Number of Member States that progress to a higher self-assessment level (compared with 2021-2022): 45 [85%] Baseline: Reporting in 2021-2022 40%had a formal network on BCI [75%] 29% conducted impact study of intervention [75%] 10% had a national strategy for BCI [38%] 29% rated 3 or above for SC1: stakeholders [85%] 56% rated 3 or above for SC2: BCI research [85%] 73% rated 3 or above for SC3: interventions [85%] LINK: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/374326 35% rated 3 or above for SC4: HR/funding [85%] 29% rated 3 or above for SC5: health strategies [85%] 2021-2022 was the baseline Compare with the last reporting – consider the level compared to 2 years ago. Try to use the same lens through which to assess the levels. Option to select “Improved, but no progress in score” Fight your bias to report success. There may be good reasons why reporting is lower (e.g. COVID). Opportunity to provide notes if progress has reversed. Baseline report: 26 https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/374326 New elements (optional) • Overall assessment of status of BCI in the last 2 years • Option to select “Improved, but no progress in score” • Opportunity to provide notes if progress has reversed. • One success story • Request to WHO for support • Key challenges ➢Nuance to help understand ➢For use as quotes and case example boxes • Acknowledgements 27 Q&A Stakeholder engangement: country experiences Suggested changes or additions to the online form? What do you need from us to succeed? WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION MONDIALE DE LA SANTÉ WELTGESUNDHEITSORGANISATION Date: 31 January 2025 ВСЕМИРНАЯ ОРГАНИЗАЦИЯ ЗДРАВООХРАНЕНИЯ REGIONAL OFFICE FOR EUROPE Ms Helen Sõber BUREAU RÉGIONAL DE L’EUROPE REGIONALBÜRO FÜR EUROPA Adviser ЕВРОПЕЙСКОЕ РЕГИОНАЛЬНОЕ БЮРО European Union Affairs and International Co- Head office: operation Department UN City, Marmorvej 51, Ministry of Social Affairs DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Suur-Ameerika 1 Tel.: +45 45 33 70 00; Fax: +45 45 33 70 01 Email: [email protected] 10122 Tallinn Website: https://www.who.int/europe Estonia Our reference: Your reference: Notre référence: Votre référence: Unser Zeichen: Ihr Zeichen: См. наш номер: На Ваш номер: Dear Ms Sõber, Reporting of activities related to behavioural and cultural insights for better health during 2023–2024 The WHO ‘United Action for Better Health’ European Programme of Work (2020–2025) identifies four flagship initiatives as accelerators of change, including behavioural and cultural insights (BCI) for better health. Setting joint vision and goals for this work, a resolution and action framework was adopted at the 72nd Regional Committee on 13 September 2022. This resolution calls on Member States to report to WHO on a set of indicators and progress measures every other year. I would like to hereby request your country to report on activities related to BCI for health during 2023–2024, using this online reporting form (https://forms.office.com/e/7rvHMzqGfh) in English or Russian language before 31 March 2025. The BCI focal points nominated in each Member State have been engaged in developing the reporting model and have received in-depth guidance on its completion. I therefore propose that the BCI focal point nominated for your country will conduct the reporting. In Estonia, the BCI focal point is Ms Nele Kunder. If this information is not correct, please inform us about the correct focal point. For guidance on reporting, please refer to the following documents which are attached: • Annex 1 of the action framework provides detailed guidance on the indicators and measures as well as definitions of key concepts. • The presentation from an information meeting for BCI focal points held on 9 December provides additional background and updates. • A Word version of the online reporting form is available to share internally within countries to obtain feedback form a larger group of people. In addition, two online drop-in clinics are open to anyone who would like to discuss the details of the reporting, solve problems or ask questions on 18 February 2025 at 9:30 CET (in English) and on 25 February at 10:00 CET (in Russian). UN City, Marmorvej 51 Tel.: +45 45 33 70 00 Email: [email protected] DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø Fax: +45 45 33 70 01 Website: https://www.who.int/europe Denmark Based on the reporting from Member States, WHO Regional Office for Europe will prepare a status report on BCI for health implementation in the Region, as requested in the resolution. The report for 2021-2022 is available online and attached. The next reporting will take place in 2027, covering activities during 2025–2026. Regional Advisor for BCI, Katrine Bach Habersaat is responsible for this activity, and it would be appreciated if you would address any queries to her (email: [email protected]). Yours sincerely, Mr Robb Butler Director, Communicable Diseases, Environment and Health WHO Regional Office for Europe Encls: • United Action for Better Health, European Programme of Work (2020-2025) (EPW) • Resolution and action framework (see Annex 1 for reporting model) • Presentation from meeting with BCI focal points on 9 December 2024 • Word version of online reporting form in English and Russian, for internal use in countries • Report for 2021-2022 Copy for information to: Ms Agne Nettan-Sepp, Head, European Union Affairs and International Co-operation Department, Ministry of Social Affairs, Suur-Ameerika 1, 10129 Tallinn, Estonia H.E. Ms Riia Salsa-Audiffren, Ambassador Representative of the Republic of Estonia, Permanent Mission of the Republic of Estonia to the United Nations Office and other international organizations in Geneva, Chemin du Petit-Saconnex 28A, CH-1209 Genève, Switzerland H.E. Mr Andre Pung, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Embassy of the Republic of Estonia, Frederiksgade 19, 4th floor, 1265 Copenhagen K, Denmark Ms Kristina Köhler, Liaison Officer, WHO Country Office, Estonia, Paldiski Road 81, 10617 Tallinn, Estonia Ms Nele Kunder, Adviser, Public Health Department, Ministry of Social Affairs, Suur-Ameerika 1, 15027 Tallinn, Estonia Dr Mall Leinsalu, National Institute for Health Development, Estonia Ms Katrine Habersaat, Regional Advisor (Behavioural and Cultural Insights), WHO Regional Office for Europe, UN City, Marmorvej 51, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Behavioural and Cultural Insights, World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Denmark –2– Biannual reporting form: activities during 202 3 and 202 4 Behavioural and Cultural Insights (BCI) for better health https://forms.office.com/pages/responsepage.aspx?id=t8AQ9iS9OUuBCz3CgK-1kMbxvmCNndRNiuSq7V3U5tdUMFk4OEFZN1o2RVZVQjJCOU8wVzg4QThNNC4u&amp;route=shorturl Thank you for completing this form. Your time and effort are greatly appreciated and will contribute to the implementation of the European Regional Action Framework for Behavioural and Cultural Insights (BCI) 2022-2027 which was adopted by Member States at the WHO Regional Committee for Europe at its 72nd session on 13 September 2022. Please report the work in your country related to the use of effective and evidence-based approaches to health behaviours. Refer to the guidance in Annex 1 of the Action Framework: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/372664 (page 16 onwards). The document provides: background, introduction and information about the use of this reporting, definitions of key concepts, information about what activities within each Strategic Commitments may involve. For more information, refer to the presentation from the BCI Community of Practice meeting held on 9 December 2024, available here: https://worldhealthorg-my.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/personal/habersaatk_who_int/ER4xIYzJEJVCmiFfTZ4qVZABReaFQNPN8FShTJG7PKv-Xg?e=fGrI6Y . The 2023-2024 report is available here: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/374326 . Please note: Please assess your levels for each strategic commitment using the same lens as was used in the last reporting, two years ago. There are several options to include reflection if this provides any challenges or requires explanations. If there is progress, but not enough to move to the next level, please note this in the textbox. Be aware of your own bias towards reporting progress or success. There may be good reasons why there is no progress or even the reverse. If progress has reversed compared to two years ago, please provide some reflections. The deadline for reporting is 31 March 2023. 1.Please state the name of the Member State you are reporting for Click or tap here to enter text. 2.Please state your own name and affiliation Click or tap here to enter text. 3.Strategic Commitment 1: Build understanding and support of BCI among key stakeholders Please self-assess your country's level in 2023-2024 , related to this Strategic Commitment. Use the below scales to guide you and select your level: ☐ Level 1: During 2023-2024 , there was little awareness of BCI for better health among key stakeholders. ☐ Level 2: There was some degree of awareness and recognition of BCI for better health among some key stakeholders. ☐ Level 3: There was widespread awareness and recognition of BCI for better health among key stakeholders, and some collaboration was initiated. ☐ Level 4: BCI for better health was recognized and supported among many key internal and external stakeholders and across various health areas, academia and civil society, and several projects were done in collaboration. ☐ Level 5: BCI for better health was widely recognized and supported among key internal and external stakeholders and across various health areas, academia and civil society, and collaboration ensured the application of a BCI lens to all relevant projects. 4.If you would like to add any comments related to your self-assessment in this area, please include them here. For example, if there was progress overall but the selected level remains the same, please make sure to note that there was progress even if it was not reflected in the score. Also, if the selected level reversed compared to two years ago, please include some reflections. Click or tap here to enter text. 5.Quantitative indicator for Strategic Commitment 1 Does your country have a dedicated formal network of internal and external stakeholders that includes the application of BCI for better health in their terms of reference? Definition of dedicated formal network: An established and formal mechanism that communicates regularly, and which includes BCI for better health in its terms of reference. This may take the form of, for example: a working group, steering committee or other function that meets regularly and is dedicated to BCI for better health; a working group, steering committee or other function that meets regularly and has BCI for better health as one key area of responsibility, among others; or ad hoc multidisciplinary project groups related to BCI projects that together ensure regular exchange among stakeholders. ☐ Yes ☐ No 6.Please state the name of this network and how it relates to BCI for better health. Click or tap here to enter text. 7.Strategic Commitment 2: Conduct BCI research Please self-assess your country's level in 2023-2024 , related to this Strategic Commitment. Use the below scales to guide you and select your level: ☐ Level 1: During 2023-2024 , no studies were conducted to explore barriers and drivers to health behaviours. ☐ Level 2: One or few single studies were conducted to explore barriers and drivers to health behaviours.* ☐ Level 3: Several studies were conducted to explore barriers and drivers to health behaviours, but not for many relevant health areas.* ☐ Level 4: Methodologically sound approaches to exploring barriers and drivers to health behaviours were applied and studies were undertaken across many relevant health areas.* ☐ Level 5: Methodologically sound approaches to exploring barriers and drivers to health behaviours were applied in a systematic manner and studies were undertaken across all relevant health areas.* 8.* If you selected levels 2, 3, 4 or 5, please list examples of the studies conducted here Click or tap here to enter text. 9.If you would like to add any comments related to your self-assessment in this area, please include them here . For example, if there was progress overall but the selected level remains the same, please make sure to note that there was progress even if it was not reflected in the score. Also, if the selected level reversed compared to two years ago, please include some reflections. Click or tap here to enter text. 10.Quantitative indicator for Strategic Commitment 2 Has at least one impact evaluation been conducted during 2023-2024 , which used randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-experimental methods to assess the impact of an activity that aimed to enhance positive health behaviours? Definition of impact evaluation: An evaluation to quantitatively measure the impact of an intervention that aims to enhance positive health behaviours using either randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-experimental methods. The intervention can relate to any health-related behaviour, for example, smoking, physical activity, nutrition, the use of prevention services, appropriate prescriptions or treatment adherence. ☐ Yes ☐ No 11.Please state the title and objective of the study conducted using RCT or quasi-experimental methods Click or tap here to enter text. 12.Strategic Commitment 3: Apply BCI to improve outcomes of health-related policies, services and communication Please self-assess your country's level in 2023-2024 , related to this Strategic Commitment. Use the below scales to guide you and select your level: ☐ Level 1: During 2023-2024 , no BCI approaches were used to inform and improve health-related policies, services and communication processes, and it was not generally encouraged. ☐ Level 2: Using BCI approaches to inform and improve health-related policies, services and communication processes was generally appreciated as important but was not implemented. ☐ Level 3: BCI approaches were occasionally used to inform and improve health-related policies, services and communication processes.* ☐ Level 4: BCI approaches were widely used to inform and improve health-related policies, services and communication processes across many relevant health areas.* ☐ Level 5: BCI approaches were systematically used to inform and improve health-related policies, services and communication processes, and the process was formalized with applications across all relevant health areas.* 13. * If you selected levels 3, 4 or 5, please briefly list examples of how and where BCI approaches were used to inform and improve health-related policies, services and communication processes Click or tap here to enter text. 14.If you would like to add any comments related to your self-assessment in this area, please include them here . For example, if there was progress overall but the selected level remains the same, please make sure to note that there was progress even if it was not reflected in the score. Also, if the selected level reversed compared to two years ago, please include some reflections. Click or tap here to enter text. 15.Strategic Commitment 4: Commit human and financial resources for BCI and ensure their sustainability Please self-assess your country's level in 2023-2024 , related to this Strategic Commitment. Use the below scales to guide you and select your level: ☐ Level 1: During 2023-2024 , no dedicated funding or people were available for BCI work for better health. ☐ Level 2: Limited funding and people were available for BCI work for better health, but only on an ad hoc basis and related to specific, one-time individual projects.* ☐ Level 3: Some dedicated funding and people were available for the structured application of BCI work for some health areas; however, the level of resources was not sufficient for systematic application across many health areas.* ☐ Level 4: A larger amount of dedicated funding and appropriately trained people were available for continued application of BCI work for more health areas; however, the level of resources was not sufficient for a systematic application across all priority health areas.* ☐ Level 5: Substantial dedicated, multiyear budgets and appropriately trained people were available for a continued systematic application of BCI across all priority health areas.* 16.* If you selected levels 2, 3, 4 or 5, please briefly list examples of resources and projects (level 2) or describe the resources available in a short paragraph (levels 3-5) Click or tap here to enter text. 17.If you would like to add any comments related to your self-assessment in this area, please include them here . For example, if there was progress overall but the selected level remains the same, please make sure to note that there was progress even if it was not reflected in the score. Also, if the selected level reversed compared to two years ago, please include some reflections. Click or tap here to enter text. 18.Strategic commitment 5: Implement strategic plan(s) for the application of BCI for better health Please self-assess your country's level in 2023-2024 , related to this Strategic Commitment. Use the below scales to guide you and select your level: ☐ Level 1: During 2023-2024 , BCI work was not mentioned in any strategies/plans related to specific health topics. ☐ Level 2: Some strategies/plans referred to BCI work, but with no clear identification of how this work will be conducted, by whom or with which target.* ☐ Level 3: Some strategies/plans made an explicit reference to BCI work and identified related actions and targets. * ☐ Level 4: Within several priority health areas, strategies/plans made an explicit commitment to BCI work and identified related actions and targets.* ☐ Level 5: Across all priority health areas, strategies/plans included a dedicated section on how BCI work should be used to reach health targets, and clearly identified actions, targets, roles and responsibilities, and resources for this work.* 19.* If you selected levels 2, 3, 4 or 5, please write the titles of strategies/plans in which BCI work was incorporated and, if possible include a link to these Click or tap here to enter text. 20.If you would like to add any comments related to your self-assessment in this area, please include them here . For example, if there was progress overall but the selected level remains the same, please make sure to note that there was progress even if it was not reflected in the score. Also, if the selected level reversed compared to two years ago, please include some reflections. Click or tap here to enter text. 21.Quantitative indicator for Strategic Commitment 5 Did your country by the end of 202 4 have a national strategy or plan which defines BCI work for better health as a national public health priority? Definition of “National strategy or plan” A document for the entire country or entity on BCI for better health, which identifies BCI as a public health priority; sets a vision, indicators, targets and actions for this work; has been made publicly available; and has high-level approval. ☐ Yes ☐ No 22.Please provide the title of the strategy or plan which identifies BCI for better health as a national public health priority Click or tap here to enter text. 23. Please share one success story related to BCI in your country during 2023-2024 (max 100 words) Click or tap here to enter text. 24. Please share actions taken by the BCI Focal Point in your country during 2023-2024 to advance the use of BCI for health Click or tap here to enter text. 25. Please share your reflections on the support you need from WHO to advance the use of more effective and evidence-based approaches to health behaviours in your country. Please also include any topics you would like to discuss during 'BCI Community of Practice' meetings. Click or tap here to enter text. 26. Please share the key challenges of advancing the use of more effective and evidence-based approaches to health behaviours in your country Click or tap here to enter text. 27. If you would like to acknowledge anyone in your country for the joint reporting, please include them her e Click or tap here to enter text. 28. If you would like to add an overall assessment of this work in your country/area in 2023-2024 or any other feedback or comments, please include them here Click or tap here to enter text. Saatja: euinsights <[email protected]> Saadetud: 05.02.2025 13:09 Adressaat: <=?utf-8?Q?Helen_S=C3=B5ber?=> Koopia: <"Agne Nettan-Sepp">; <[email protected]>; Riia Salsa-Audiffren <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; Andre Pung <[email protected]>; KÖHLER, Kristina <[email protected]>; Nele Kunder <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; Mall Leinsalu <[email protected]>; HABERSAAT, Katrine Bach <[email protected]>; euinsights <[email protected]> Teema: Reporting of activities related to behavioural and cultural insights for better health during 2023-2024 CRM:0324075 Tähelepanu! Tegemist on välisvõrgust saabunud kirjaga.Tundmatu saatja korral palume linke ja faile mitte avada.Tähelepanu! Tegemist on välisvõrgust saabunud kirjaga.Tundmatu saatja korral palume linke ja faile mitte avada.Please see the attached correspondence sent from the World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe. One or more attachments may be included.Veuillez vous r¨¦f¨¦rer ¨¤ la correspondance ci-jointe du Bureau r¨¦gional de l'Europe de l'Organisation mondiale de la sant¨¦. Une ou plusieurs annexes peuvent ¨ºtre jointes.Mit der Bitte um Kenntnisnahme der beiliegenden Korrespondenz (eine oder mehrere Anlagen), Weltgesundheitsorganisation, Regionalb¨¹ro f¨¹r Europa§³§Þ. §á§â§Ú§Ü§â§Ö§á§Ý§Ö§ß§ß§í§Ö §á§Ú§ã§î§Þ§Ñ §à§ä§¦§ Ó§â§à§á§Ö§Û§ã§Ü§à§Ô§ ⧧֧ԧڧà§ß§Ñ§Ý§î§ß§à§Ô§à §Ò§ð§â§à §£§ã§Ö§Þ§Ú§â§ß§à§Û §à§â§Ô§Ñ§ß§Ú§Ù§Ñ§è§Ú§Ú §Ù§Õ§â§Ñ§Ó§à§à§ç§â§Ñ§ß§Ö§ß§Ú§ñ (§à§Õ§Ú§ß §Ú§Ý§Ú §ß§Ö§ã§Ü§à§Ý§î§Ü§à §á§â§Ú§Ü§â§Ö§á§Ý§Ö§ß§ß§í§ç §æ§Ñ§Û§Ý§à§Ó).