NSO reporting to ETSI in support of the ESO report to the EC /EFTA required under Article 24 of Regulation 1025/2012 Introduction Article 24 of Regulation 1025/2012 requires that ETSI delivers a consolidated report. The information contained is to cover the preceding year. As a consequence the information provided by early 2022 should cover the full year 2021 . The report to be delivered will not be a bundle of national reports but is to be provided as a consolidated report of information in a format that allows conclusions and comparison over a number of years. As agreed with CEN-CENELEC and the EU/EFTA, this will only be possible if input is made with structured information based on common questions and some agreed definitions. The report is to contain detailed information on the following: the application of Articles 4, 5, 10, 15 and 17 of Regulation 1025/2012 ; the representation of SMEs, consumer organisations and environmental and social stakeholders in national standardisation bodies; the representation of SMEs on the basis of the annual NSO reports referred to in Article 6(3) of Regulation 1025/2012 ; the use of ICT in the standardisation system; co-operation between the national standardisation bodies and European standardisation organisations. Although not part of the Article 24 reporting, there is also the issue of Article 3 ( Transparency of work programmes of standardisation bodies) . Regulation 1025/2012 requires that a t least once a year, each European standardisation organisation and national standardisation body shall establish its work programme. Please note that although the term NSB is used in the regulation the EC (DG GROW) has advised that this is also to be interpreted as NSO for ETSI. The work programme shall contain information on the standards and European standardisation deliverables which a European standardisation organisation or national standardisation body intends to prepare or amend, which it is preparing or amending and which it has adopted in the period of the preceding work programme, unless these are identical or equivalent transpositions of international or European standards. T he EC has indicated that they are most interested in " national " programmes with the expectation that the European level will be covered by the ESOs. ETSI NSOs a re asked to provide a URL to any web-based dynamic national work programmes or any self-standing programmes to the ETSI Secretariat so that these can be added to the NSO Portal page . Any NSOs with difficulties to identify such links are requested to notify the ETSI Secretariat as soon as possible to investigate further options ( e.g. link to a specific document). This will help in the context of article 3(4) of Regulation 1025/2012. It is proposed that ETSI’s NSOs provide their input (response to the questionnaire) by close of business by the end of January 2022 and to send the input to the following mailbox:
[email protected] 1 Definitions As for 2015 , the following base definitions apply : SMEs SME stands for small and medium-sized enterprises – as defined in EU recommendation 2003/361 . The main factors determining whether a company is an SME are: number of employees And either turnover or balance sheet total . Company category Employees Turnover Or Balance sheet total Medium-sized < 250 ≤ € 50 m ≤ € 43 m Small < 50 ≤ € 10 m ≤ € 10 m Micro < 10 ≤ € 2 m ≤ € 2 m These ceilings apply to the figures for individual firms only. A firm, which is part of larger grouping, may need to include employee/turnover/balance sheet data from that grouping too. Consumer Organisations Any non-profit-making organisation (governmental or non-governmental) independent of industry, commercial and business or other conflicting interests, representing the interests of consumers in standardisation activities at national level. Environmental Organisations Any non-profit-making organisation (governmental or non-governmental) independent of industry, commercial and business or other conflicting interests, representing broad or specific environmental interests in standardisation activities at national level. Social Organisations Any non-profit-making organisation (governmental or non-governmental) independent of industry, commercial and business or other conflicting interests, representing employees and workers’ basic rights, for instance trade unions. QUESTIONNAIRE FOR NSO INPUT UNDER ARTICLE 24, REGULATION 1025/2012 Article 4 - T RANSPARENCY Q.1 : How many requests to provide draft national standards have you received from an NSO/NSB/NC , ESO or the EC /EFTA ? NS O/NC/NSB 0 ESO 0 EC /EFTA 0 Q . 1.1 : Have the relevant drafts been provided in all cases? FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No If No please give explanation/further details: FORMTEXT add explanation here Q . 1.2 : On how many of the drafts provided have you received comments from the originator? NSO/NC/NSB 0 ESO 0 EC /EFTA 0 Q . 1.2.1 : On how many of those drafts did you receive a comment indicating that they would have a negative impact on the internal market? Number of drafts with potential negative impact 0 If Not 0 , provide explanation (including originator of the comment, identifier of draft standard, related actions): FORMTEXT add explanation here Q . 1.3 : Were responses to the received comments provided with in 3 months in all cases? FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No If No , please give explanation/further details: FORMTEXT add explanation here Q.2 : How do you ensure access to draft national standards in such a way that all relevant parties , in particular those established in other Member States , have the opportunity to submit comments? Q . 2.1 - Do you have an online public commenting platform? FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No FORMCHECKBOX Planned FORMTEXT Month-Year If yes , provide URL: https://komport.evs.ee/ Q . 2.2 - If not, how do you ensure the required access to draft national standards to all relevant parties? Please explain: FORMTEXT add explanation here Q.3 : In how many technical activities has another NSO passively or actively , by sending an observer, been involved during the development process ( e.g. during the initial drafting, in comments resolution meetings, etc.) ? NSO passively or actively involved 0 If Not 0 please provide further details (including NSO, identifier of draft standard/area of activity, relevant details): FORMTEXT add explanation here Article 6 (3) MEASURES TO ENCOURAGE AND FACILITATE SMES’ ACCESS TO STANDARDS AND STANDARDIZATION The first 6 questions below are examples taken from Regulation 1025/2012, rather than required actions that can demonstrate how ETSI’s NSOs are looking to facilitate SMEs’ access to standards and standardization. The 7 th q uestion enables ETSI NSOs to give other examples of the activities they undertake to assist SMEs. Q.1 : Do you identify standardization projects which are of particular interest to SMEs? FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No FORMCHECKBOX Planned FORMTEXT Month-Year If y es, how are standardization projects w hich are of particular interest for SMEs indicated? FORMCHECKBOX I ndication in our annual work programme FORMCHECKBOX I ndication through our website FORMCHECKBOX T hrough dedicated mailings FORMCHECKBOX O ther FORMTEXT add explanation here Comments : FORMTEXT add additional comments here Q.2 : Do you give access to standardization activities without obliging SMEs to become a member of your national standardization organization? FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No FORMCHECKBOX Planned FORMTEXT Month-Year If yes, please indicate what access you provide FORMCHECKBOX Direct participation in the national technical committees FORMCHECKBOX SME helpdesk FORMCHECKBOX Online support FORMCHECKBOX Consultation of texts of standards FORMCHECKBOX Commenting on drafts FORMCHECKBOX Other FORMTEXT add explanation here Comments FORMTEXT add additional comments here Q.3 : Do you provide free access or special rates to participate in standardization activities? FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No FORMCHECKBOX Planned FORMTEXT Month-Year If y es, please indicate how you have done so FORMCHECKBOX SMEs have free access to all standardization activities FORMCHECKBOX SMEs get special rates for FORMCHECKBOX P artici pating in national TBs FORMCHECKBOX A ttending workshops FORMCHECKBOX A ttending training sessions FORMCHECKBOX P urchasing brochures, leaflets FORMCHECKBOX U se logistics (meeting rooms, promotional material ...) FORMCHECKBOX D iscount prices to mem bers/subscribers FORMCHECKBOX O ther There are “ Standards access points ” https://www.evs.ee/en/standards-access-points Comments FORMTEXT add additional comments here Q.4 : Do you provide free access to draft standards? FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No FORMCHECKBOX Planned FORMTEXT Month-Year If y es, pleas e indicate how you have done so: FORMCHECKBOX D raft standards can be consulted at our premises ( e.g. library) FORMCHECKBOX W e provide onlin e access ( e.g. Enquiry portal) FORMCHECKBOX O ther FORMTEXT add explanation here Comments FORMTEXT add additional comments here Q.5 : Do you make abstracts/scopes of standards available free of charge? FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No FORMCHECKBOX Planned FORMTEXT Month-Year If y es, pleas e indicate how you have done so FORMCHECKBOX V ia our website FORMCHECKBOX V ia link to the ETSI website FORMCHECKBOX U pon request via e-mail FORMCHECKBOX O ther FORMTEXT add explanation here Comments FORMTEXT add additional comments here Q.6 : Do you apply special rates to SMEs for the provision of standards or providing bundles of standards at a reduced price? FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No FORMCHECKBOX Planned FORMTEXT Month-Year If Yes, please indicate how you have done so FORMCHECKBOX S pecial rates are granted for the provision of all standards to SMEs FORMCHECKBOX S pecial rates are granted for bundles of standards to SMEs Comments FORMTEXT add additional comments here Q.7 : What other measures have you taken to encourage and facilitate the access of SMEs to standards and the standards development process? We have packages of standards available for reduced price. We have variety of online reading services where price per standard will be extremely low. etc. All those possibilities are available for everybody, including SME-s. There are “Standards access points” https://www.evs.ee/en/standards-access-points ETSI NSOs EXCHANGE OF BEST PRACTICES Q. 8 : Do you have measures for exchan ge of best practices with ETSI ? No special measures are stated. Q. 9 : Please provide the link to the report on your SME related activities on your website There is only short explanation in English here : https://www.evs.ee/en/why-should-you-participate-in-the-work-of-a-committee Full explanation is unf o rtunately only available in Etonian: https://www.evs.ee/images/uploaded/SME%20Raport%202021.pdf Please note that all links given in this document refer to web page of Estonian Centre for Standardisation and Accreditation . This is due to the fact that according to Estonian regulation only they have a right to draw up and transpose standards. Thus our work on international standardisation is done in close cooperation with them. Art 24 1(b) – Representation of SMEs, consumer organisations and environmental and social stakeholders in national standardization bodies SMEs Participation at policy level Q. 1 : Is representation foreseen, and were SMEs represented (either individually or through an association) , at policy level ( i.e. non-technical bodies) within your organisation : Foreseen Encouraged* Represented in 20 21 SMEs FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No * P articipation of SMEs is promoted ( e.g. proactive contacts) Further clarifi cations/explanations (optional ): Two SME-s are participating in ETSI. Participation at technical level Q.2 : In how many national technical bodies ( e.g. national technical committees, national mirror committees) , where such participation is considered as relevant, are the interests of SMEs represented: # of national technical bodies for which representation is considered relevant # of national technical bodies where interests are represented SMEs 0 0 Specify the means by which the above figures were developed: FORMCHECKBOX Estimation FORMCHECKBOX Measure ( e.g. database) FORMCHECKBOX Other: FORMTEXT add explanation here Further clarifi cations/explanations (optional ): Our organisations (including SMEs) find that participating on ETSI level is more useful for them, as it generates more fruitful discussions and gives more useful contacts (this also explains answers given below). Consumer organisations and environmental and social stakeholders Participation at policy level Q. 3 : Is representation foreseen, and were the following stakeholder groups represented, at policy level ( i.e. non-technical bodies) within your organisation : Foreseen Encouraged* Represented in 20 21 Consumer Organisations FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No Environmental Stakeholders FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No Social Stakeholders FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No * P articipation of these organisations is promoted ( e.g. proactive contacts) Further clarifications/explanations (optional): FORMTEXT add explanation here Participation at technical level Q. 4: In how many national technical bodies ( e.g. national technical committees, national mirror committees) , where such participation is considered as relevant, are the interests below represented: # of national technical bodies for which representation is considered relevant # of national technical bodies where interests are represented Consumer Organisations 0 0 Environmental Stakeholders 0 0 Social Stakeholders 0 0 Specify the means by which the above figures were developed: FORMCHECKBOX Estimation FORMCHECKBOX Measure ( e.g. database) FORMCHECKBOX Other: FORMTEXT add explanation here Further clarifications/explanations (optional – e.g. relevance of participation , specific activities to encourage representation): FORMTEXT add explanation here Article 24 (d) - Use of ICT in the standardization system Preliminaries : S ection 24 ( d ) of the report to the EC/EFTA needs to cover both the situation at European level and national level At the European level, a document will be prepared identifying and describing the IT systems used throughout the standards development process (from drafting to publication) but also visibility tools ( e.g. web sites) At the national level, a similar approach is proposed in order to collect information that can be consolidated and compared over the years In order to be able to build a consistent picture, a list of key systems and functions and associated tools will be proposed to identify what is available at national level. Q. 1 : Does your national IT infrastructure include: A data management system for work programme information to support high volume of data storage and compatible exchange with ETSI FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No FORMCHECKBOX Planned FORMTEXT Month-Year FORMCHECKBOX Local FORMCHECKBOX Hosted Other: FORMTEXT add explanation here Database/directory for managing experts participating in your national technical bodies FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No FORMCHECKBOX Planned FORMTEXT Month-Year FORMCHECKBOX Local FORMCHECKBOX Hosted Other: FORMTEXT add explanation here A document management system to support high volumes of documents storage and compatible exchange with ETSI FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No FORMCHECKBOX Planned FORMTEXT Month-Year FORMCHECKBOX Local FORMCHECKBOX Hosted Other: FORMTEXT add explanation here A Web site FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No FORMCHECKBOX Planned FORMTEXT Month-Year FORMTEXT add additional explanation here if needed Q. 2 : Do you provide tools to support standards drafting? FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No FORMCHECKBOX Planned FORMTEXT Month-Year FORMCHECKBOX National template FORMCHECKBOX Wiki FORMCHECKBOX Virtual meeting facilities Other: FORMTEXT add explanation here Q. 3 : How do you make working documents available to all Members participating in national technical bodies? FORMCHECKBOX via a web-platform (collaboration tool) FORMCHECKBOX Planned FORMTEXT Month-Year FORMCHECKBOX via e-mail FORMCHECKBOX Planned FORMTEXT Month-Year Other: FORMTEXT add explanation here Q.4 : Do you provide facilities to organise polls or votes at national technical body level? FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX Planned FORMTEXT Month-Year FORMCHECKBOX No Q.5 : How do you make your public enquiry documents available? FORMCHECKBOX O n-line public commenting platform FORMCHECKBOX Planned FORMTEXT Month-Year FORMCHECKBOX Protected web platform FORMCHECKBOX Planned FORMTEXT Month-Year FORMCHECKBOX B y e-mail FORMCHECKBOX Planned FORMTEXT Month-Year Other: FORMTEXT add explanation here Q. 6: If you have a public commenting system, do you provide facilities to submit comments at various stages? FORMCHECKBOX New Work Item proposals FORMCHECKBOX Planned FORMTEXT Month-Year FORMCHECKBOX Drafts under enquiry FORMCHECKBOX Planned FORMTEXT Month-Year FORMCHECKBOX Published standards ( e . g . for review) FORMCHECKBOX Planned FORMTEXT Month-Year Other: FORMTEXT add explanation here Q.7 : Do you use IT tools for the handling of comments? FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No FORMCHECKBOX Planned FORMTEXT Month-Year Q.8 : Which electronic media is used to make your published standards available? FORMCHECKBOX web store FORMCHECKBOX Planned FORMTEXT Month-Year FORMCHECKBOX web site (free) FORMCHECKBOX Planned FORMTEXT Month-Year FORMCHECKBOX e-mail on request Other: FORMTEXT add explanation here
Andres Teeäär
Saatja: Andres Teeäär
Saatmisaeg: reede, 28. jaanuar 2022 11:12
Adressaat: 'ETSI Webvote-Contact'
Koopia: Maret Ots; Oliver Gailan
Teema: RE: Regulation 1025/2012 reporting requirements
Manused: ETSI-NSO_Regulation_1025_Est_CPTRA_2021.docx
Dear Ms Martin,
Thank you for reminder and sorry for delay!
Please find the report for Estonia CPTRA attached.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact.
With Best Regards,
Andres Teeäär
Chief Specialist of the Frequency Management Division
+ 372 667 2094 |
[email protected] | https://www.ttja.ee
Consumer Protection and Technical Regulatory Authority
Endla 10A, 10122 Tallinn, Estonia
From: nso_info : distribution list for nso information <
[email protected]> On Behalf Of
ETSI Webvote-Contact
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2022 11:36 AM
To:
[email protected]
Subject: Regulation 1025/2012 reporting requirements
Importance: High
Dear all,
First of all, the Webvote team and myself would like to reiterate our best wished for this new year. We
are looking forward to work with you in 2022
I would also like to thank the NSO who have already provided us with their reporting and link to their national
work programme, and would like to encourage the ones who have not yet provided us with, to do it before the
end of this month.
The deadline to send the form filled in and the link to your national work programme to webvote-
[email protected] is January 30th.
I have attached the previous email sent on the subject with all the details in this email.
If you need further details, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Best regards,
Nathalie Martin
ETSI ● Webvote ● http://portal.etsi.org/nso ●
[email protected]
1
Phone: +33 (0)4 92 94 42 00
This email may contain confidential information and is intended for the use of the addressee only. Any unauthorized use may be
unlawful. If you receive this email by mistake, please advise the sender immediately by using the reply facility in your email
software. Thank you for your co-operation.
2