Vastuskiri

Saatja: "UndressMe Support" <[email protected]> Saaja: "Politsei- ja Piirivalveamet" <[email protected]> Teema: Re: Taotlus Kuupäev: 2026-04-18 03:11 Dear Mr. Kamenski, We write in response to the Procedural Notice and Request for Assistance to Counter the Threat dated 17 April 2026, reference no. 2.1-3/13719-1. UndressMe AI takes any indication of child sexual abuse material, sexualized depictions of minors, or other unlawful content involving minors extremely seriously. Our service does not permit users to upload, request, generate, or distribute content involving minors in sexual or suggestive contexts. Our published terms also prohibit fictional sexualized depictions of minors and non-consensual intimate imagery, and our privacy notice states that the service is not intended for persons under 18 years of age. By way of background, our current application design includes authenticated access to core upload and task-creation functions. The application also maintains task-level metadata associated with processing activity, including user identifiers, task type/provider, source URL, result URL, and timestamps. In addition, the application maintains account/session-related records, including session IP address and user-agent fields where available, user analytics records including fingerprint and IP-related fields where available, and payment-order records associated with Gem purchases. These records may assist with targeted review and lawful cooperation with competent authorities. We have also implemented a supplemental technical safeguard for uploaded source images. In particular, AI reviews recent task source images using automated face-age estimation and can automatically ban accounts when an uploaded image appears clearly underage. A resulting ban reason is recorded on the account, and active sessions are revoked. This safeguard is intended as a preventative screening measure for uploaded reference images and should not be understood as a substitute for case-specific review or as a conclusive legal age determination. In response to the specific questions raised in your notice: 1. Whether we have detected attempts to generate images depicting minors in sexual or suggestive contexts: We have already banned 325 accounts in connection with child sexual content-related misuse. 2. What technical measures are implemented in the Program to prevent such content: Our current measures include contractual prohibitions in our Terms of Service, adult-only service positioning, authenticated access to core generation endpoints, retention of task, account, and session metadata for review, and a supplemental uploaded-image age-estimation safeguard as described above. 3. Whether any content moderation or automated detection mechanisms are used to identify prompts or generated images involving minors: Based on the codebase we reviewed, we can confirm an automated review mechanism for uploaded source images. 4. Whether we retain logs, metadata, or other information regarding generated content that could assist in identifying such misuse: We are able to preserve and review relevant task metadata, account and session data, user analytics data, and payment-order records that may assist with targeted review and lawful cooperation. 5. Whether we have previously reported similar incidents to competent authorities: Not yet. 6. Whether the generation of content through the Program requires Gems or other paid tokens and whether records of such transactions are retained: Generation through the web application requires Gems. Our application maintains payment-order records associated with Gem purchases. 7. Whether the Program stores generated content or corresponding hash values that could be used for identification: Our reviewed application schema shows storage of content URLs and related task metadata. We did not identify a dedicated content-hash field in the reviewed application database schema. Our public service documentation states that uploaded or processed content is stored temporarily for up to 24 hours, after which it is intended to be deleted, and that browser-side copies may persist locally on the user’s device. We are conducting an internal review and preserving relevant records. At present, the notice does not include sample URLs, image hashes, account identifiers, timestamps, or other technical indicators for the three reported cases. Without such indicators, our ability to perform a targeted match is limited. If available, please provide any of the following so that we can search more precisely: URLs, screenshots, image hashes, timestamps and time zone, relevant user or account identifiers, or any other technical indicators linked to the reported material. Yours sincerely, admin On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 7:31 AM Politsei- ja Piirivalveamet &lt;[email protected]&gt; wrote: Please be informed that we are sending you a digitally signed document &quot;Procedural notice and request for assistance to counter the threat&quot;, which was registered in the document register of the Police and Border Guard Board on 17.04.2026 under number 2.1-3/13719-1. The necessary software and technical support for opening the digitally signed document can be found on the ID-help page. Police and Border Guard Board Pärnu mnt 139 15060 Tallinn Estonia [email protected] www.politsei.ee