Sissetulev kiriAvalik
Kiri sisse kommentaaridega Pärnu Haigla raporti kohta
Astangu Kutserehabilitatsiooni Keskus · 19. detsember 2013
- Viit
- 6-9.1/581-2
- Registreeritud
- 19. detsember 2013
- Dokumendi liik
- Sissetulev kiri
- Funktsioon
- 6 Arendustegevus
- Sari
- 6-9.1 EQUASS projekt
- Toimik
- 6-9.1/2013
- Vastutaja
- Kristi Viisimaa
Sisu (failidest)
Kristi Reimets
Saatja: Keiu Talve
Saatmisaeg: 17. detsember 2013. a. 12:16
Adressaat: Kristi Reimets
Teema: FW: Audit report- Pärnu haigla- EST2013-13
Tähtsus: Kõrge
From: Guus van Beek [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 11:24 AM
To: Keiu Talve
Cc: Jan Spooren; Marie Dubost
Subject: Re: Audit report- Pärnu haigla- EST2013-13
Importance: High
Dear Keiu,
I have reviewed the documentation sent about the performance of Pärnu haigla (Reference number
EST2013-13) against the EQUASS criteria and underlying indicators.
After reviewing the audit report I noticed that the feedback given (suggestions for improvement) may
give the impression that they are in conflict with the required performance on the indicators
(questions). The feedback may give the impression that the organization does not meet the criteria
and underlying indicators. (see; feedback on criteria: 18 – 19 – 21 – 26 – 30 - 31)
Based on this audit report, the organization Pärnu haigla (Reference number EST2013-13) cannot be
certified with EQUASS Assurance in Social Services.
I kindly aks you to inform the auditor about this and to adjust the relevant documentation (Excel file
and/or Audit report).
Note:
1. In many of the suggestions for improvement it is asked to provide MORE evidence in meeting
the criteria / indicators. I would like to stress that MORE does not guarantee that it will be
BETTER. Other information as evidence might be much more relevant.
2. In many if the suggestions for improvement the auditor is suggestion to establish evidence
in written and documented form. I would like to stress that it is up to the social service
provider how to proof the performance of the criteria / indicators. (within the restricting
that some of the indicators (50 %) will require documented evidence. (I.e. If it is asked to
have procedures and/or policies) The suggestions for more documentation as evidence on
performance on EQUASS criteria / indicators may create more (unnecessary) bureaucracy
for the sake of the EQUASS quality mark. It may also limit the flexibility of meeting the
Equass requirements for small organization and in various sectors.
Kind regards,
Guus van Beek
European Quality in Social Services (EQUASS)
1
c/o EPR, 15, Rue de Spa , B-1000 Brussels
Belgium
Phone: +31653770121
Email: [email protected] / website: www.equass.be
Van: Keiu Talve <[email protected]>
Datum: vrijdag 29 november 2013 10:10
Aan: Guus van Beek <[email protected]>
CC: Marie Dubost <[email protected]>
Onderwerp: Audit report- Pärnu haigla- EST2013-13
Dear Guus,
Attached you’ll find audit documents of Pärnu Hospital’s social services.
Please review the documents and let me know if any questions, comments!
Keiu
EQUASS Eesti
Astangu KRK
Tel: +372 5682 9104
www.equass.ee
www.astangu.ee
2