dokumendiregister.ee
OtsingAsutusedMCP
Otsing›Veeteede Amet
Väljaminev kiriAvalik

IHO Resolution 2/2007

Veeteede Amet · 9. jaanuar 2018
Viit
6-1-1/46
Registreeritud
9. jaanuar 2018
Dokumendi liik
Väljaminev kiri
Adressaat
Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency of Germany
Saabumis/saatmisviis
e-post
Funktsioon
6-1 Navigatsiooni korraldamine
Sari
6-1-1 Kirjavahetus hüdrograafilistes ja meremõõdistuste küsimustes
Toimik
6-1-1/2018
Vastutaja
Taivo Kivimäe (Veeteede Amet, Kasutajad, Hüdrograafia ja navigatsioonimärgistuse teenistus)

Failid

  • 📎S-122_Marine Protected Area_EST_Dec_2017.docx75 KB
  • 📎S-123_Radio Services_EST_Dec_2017.docx73 KB
  • 📎Vs_ IHO Resolution 2_2007; Invitation to product specification implementation survey.pdf150 KB

Sisu (failidest)

From: Taivo Kivimäe To: Jens Schröder-Fürstenberg Cc: Olavi Heinlo; Leo Käärmann; Sander Linikoja; [email protected]; Signe Paevere Subject: Vs: IHO Resolution 2/2007; Invitation to product specification implementation survey Date: Tuesday, January 9, 2018 3:02:30 PM Attachments: S-122_Marine Protected Area_EST_Dec_2017.docx S-123_Radio Services_EST_Dec_2017.docx Mr Jens Schröder-Fürstenberg NIPWG Chairman Please find attatched Estonian surveys. Yours sincerely, Taivo Kivimäe Head of Hydrography and Aids to Navigation Division Maritime Administration Valge tn 4 11413 Tallinn ESTONIA Tel +372 6205 600, Fax +372 6205 606, GSM +372 5010 406 E-mail: [email protected] Saatja: Jens Schröder-Fürstenberg [mailto:[email protected]] Saatmisaeg: reede, 1. detsember 2017 8:03 Adressaat: … Koopia: Edward Hosken <[email protected]>; Abri KAMPFER <[email protected]>; Yves GUILLAM <[email protected]>; Tom Loeper <[email protected]> Teema: IHO Resolution 2/2007; Invitation to product specification implementation survey Dear IHO contacts, Based on IHO resolution 2/2007, NIPWG is pleased to invite you to participate the survey on the S- 122 (Marine Protected Area) and S-123 (Radio Services) implementation. The survey seeks feedback from all potential parties involved in the production and distribution chain including software developer and end users. The attached white paper and the invitation provide background information and specific survey details. Each survey might require no more than 5-10 minutes time. Your feedback is important to us and NIPWG appreciates it if you could spend few minutes of your time to complete the survey. Deadline for responses is 31 January 2018. Thanks and best regards Jens Schröder-Fürstenberg (NIPWG Chairman) Jens Schröder-Fürstenberg Sachgebietsleiter/ Head of Section Nautische Redaktion/ Nautical Editorial Office Tel +49-381-4563-764 Fax +49-381-4563-769 [email protected] Neptunallee 5 | 18057 Rostock | Germany Das Bundesamt für Seeschifffahrt und Hydrographie ist eine Bundesoberbehörde im Geschäftsbereich des Bundesministeriums für Verkehr und digitale Infrastruktur (BMVI) 1. What is your stakeholder Group? Software developer Data Producer Service Provider End user 2. What is your role in the stakeholder Group? HO (hydrographic product/service delivery) Other government agency Navigation System Manufacturer (ECDIS) Navigation System Manufacturer (ECS) Navigation System Manufacturer (PPU) Production Tool Developer Service Provider Developer (SDK) Developer (Kernel) Navigator Ecologist GIS user Coast Guard MPA management authority Other (please specify) (max 50 characters) 3. Do you plan to produce or use S-122 datasets? Yes Yes, under conditions No If yes, under conditions, please describe (max 50 characters) 4. I f Yes, what benefit do you expect from S-122 compared with existing mechanisms? Ease of access to data/information Interoperability with other data/Information Neutral More frequent/up to date information Other (please specify) (max 50 characters) 5. If Yes, how confident are you that you understand how to implement S-122? We have fully read and understand the details of the product specification We have a reasonable understanding, and are confident we can implement, but have not yet studied the product specification in detail We understand the concept, but lack confidence in full understanding We haven’t yet studied the product specification Other (please specify) (max 50 characters) 6. If Yes, what is the main driver for implementation? Internal data Management Standardised data transfer between organisations Delivery of data/services to end users 7. If Yes, do you expect implementation issues? Inconsistencies with ENC content Insufficient access to information needed Insufficient availability of information needed Lack of understanding of how to implement Lack of production capability (e.g. application Software) Other (please specify) (max 50 characters) 8. If Yes, when do you plan to start the implementation? Within a 3 year time frame Within a 5 year time frame Not specified yet Other (please specify) (max 50 characters) 9. If No, what are the issues preventing you from implementation? No customer request to provide this information Lack of available data Not responsible for handling this type of information Lack of maturity of S-100 environment Other (please specify) (max 50 characters) 10. Do you foresee any disadvantages, risks and issues for your organization from a technical and/or from a commercial or resources perspective. DONE 1 . What is your stakeholder Group? Software developer Data Producer Service Provider End user 2. What is your role in the stakeholder Group? HO (hydrographic product/service delivery) Other government agency Navigation System Manufacturer (ECDIS) Navigation System Manufacturer (ECS) Navigation System Manufacturer (PPU) Production Tool Developer Service Provider Developer (SDK) Developer (Kernel) Navigator Ecologist GIS user Coast Guard Other (please specify) (max 50 characters) 3. Do you plan to produce or use S-123 datasets? Yes Yes, under conditions No If yes, under conditions, please describe (max 50 characters) 4. f Yes, what benefit do you expect from S-123 compared with existing mechanisms? Ease of access to data/information Interoperability with other data/Information Neutral More frequent/up to date information Other (please specify) (max 50 characters) 5. If Yes, how confident are you that you understand how to implement S-123? We have fully read and understand the details of the product specification We have a reasonable understanding, and are confident we can implement, but have not yet studied the product specification in detail We understand the concept, but lack confidence in full understanding We haven’t yet studied the product specification Other (please specify) (max 50 characters) 6. If Yes, what is the main driver for implementation? Internal data Management Standardised data transfer between organisations Delivery of data/services to end users 7. If Yes, do you expect implementation issues? Inconsistencies with ENC content Insufficient access to information needed Insufficient availability of information needed Lack of understanding of how to implement Lack of production capability (e.g. application Software) Other (please specify) (max 50 characters) 8. If Yes, when do you plan to start the implementation? Within a 3 year time frame Within a 5 year time frame Not specified yet Other (please specify) (max 50 characters) 9. If No, what are the issues preventing you from implementation? No customer request to provide this information Lack of available data Not responsible for handling this type of information Lack of maturity of S-100 environment Other (please specify) (max 50 characters) 10. Do you foresee any disadvantages, risks and issues for your organization from a technical and/or from a commercial or resources perspective. DONE
Allikas: Veeteede Amet dokumendiregister →
dokumendiregister.eeAsutusedEesti avalike dokumendiregistrite otsing · nimistu.ee andmetel