Saatja: "European Business Intelligence" <
[email protected]>
Saaja: "RAM Info"
Teema: European Business Intelligence I 04 February 2025
Kuupäev: 2025-02-04 07:00
Tähelepanu! Tegemist on välisvõrgust saabunud kirjaga.
Tundmatu saatja korral palume linke ja faile mitte avada.
Show message in browser
<https://cdn.flxml.eu/r-3b6ec36a961584f152aebeaf5c47da353272bbde92ae621a>
4 February 2025
Mark your calendars for the EU Energy Summit and EU-Ukraine Business Summit!
The EU Energy Summit
<https://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-2194868408-3b6ec36a961584f152aebeaf5c47da353272bbde92ae621a>
will take place on 7 & 8 April at Egmont Palace in Brussels. The Summmit
will focus on advancing Europe’s energy transition, tackling sustainability
challenges, and ensuring energy security in a rapidly changing global
landscape.
Shortly after, don't miss the EU-Ukraine Business Summit
<https://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-2194868412-3b6ec36a961584f152aebeaf5c47da353272bbde92ae621a>
, happening on 10 & 11 April at Autoworld in Brussels. The Summit,
co-organised with the European Commission, the Italian Permanent
Representation to the EU, the Polish Presidency of the Council of the EU and
the Ukraine Mission to the EU, will explore opportunities to strengthen
economic cooperation, foster investment, and support Ukraine’s path towards
closer integration with Europe.
Save the date and stay tuned: registration opening soon!
<https://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-2194868408-3b6ec36a961584f152aebeaf5c47da353272bbde92ae621a>
<https://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-2194868412-3b6ec36a961584f152aebeaf5c47da353272bbde92ae621a>
This week's highlights
* European Commission allocates €1.2 billion to 41 cross-border energy
infrastructure projects
* European Union must impose a ‘third way’ in field of artificial
intelligence, according to several organisations in sector
* European leaders to discuss future of defence
* Facing implementation and ambition gaps, G20 countries are not on track to
meet Paris Agreement targets
* Twelve EU countries urge European Commission to accelerate investigations
into electoral interference via social networks
SECTORAL POLICIES: European Commission allocates €1.2 billion to 41
cross-border energy infrastructure projects
On Thursday 30 January, the European Commission announced that it would be
allocating more than €1.2 billion under the ‘Connecting Europe Facility’
(CEF) to 41 cross-border energy infrastructure projects (5 works projects
and 36 studies), which obtained the status of Projects of Common Interest
and Projects of Mutual Interest (PCI and PMIs) in 2024 under the revised
TEN-E Regulation.
This funding goes beyond the €850 million announced at the time of the call
in April 2024 (see EUROPE 13402/8
<https://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-2194866180-3b6ec36a961584f152aebeaf5c47da353272bbde92ae621a>
).
Nearly €750 million will be allocated to 8 electricity grid projects,
including offshore electricity networks and smart electricity grids.
The Bornholm Energy Island project for the construction of an innovative
hybrid interconnector in the Baltic Sea linking Denmark and Germany will
receive the largest sum: €645 million.
A sum of €250 million will be devoted to hydrogen infrastructure, which will
benefit from grants for 21 development studies, which “will help to
alleviate investment risks associated with this nascent market and
complement the hydrogen policy framework introduced in the (...) gas market
package”, states a Commission press release.
Additionally, CO2 infrastructures will benefit from €250 million in funding
(3 projects and 9 preparatory studies).
Formal adoption of the award decision will follow in the coming weeks. The
European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency (CINEA)
will then be responsible for preparing grant agreements with the
beneficiaries. The next call for funding is scheduled for later this year.
To see the list: https://aeur.eu/f/fai
<https://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-2194866170-3b6ec36a961584f152aebeaf5c47da353272bbde92ae621a>
(Original version in French by Pauline Denys)
SECTORAL POLICIES: European Union must impose a ‘third way’ in field of
artificial intelligence, according to several organisations in sector
In a joint press release published on 29 January, three artificial
intelligence organisations - European AI Forum, AI-Data-Robotics-Association
and EIT Digital - urge the Commission to find a third way forward for the
development of artificial intelligence (AI) in Europe.
For the EU, it is time to invest in an artificial intelligence model
“reflective of European values - transparency, accountability and
sustainability”, they write.
“Europe can lead with purpose not by merely catching up with the US or
China, but by defining a bold, forward-looking vision for AI”.
In their view, there is a definite interest in AI models that would be in
line with the values promoted by the Union and that could avoid dependence
on the great powers criticised, namely China and the United States (see
EUROPE 13563/11
<https://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-2194866186-3b6ec36a961584f152aebeaf5c47da353272bbde92ae621a>
).
To achieve this, the EU must count on more private investment, a reduction
in administrative burdens and an “improvement in development conditions” for
the sector.
These demands have already been made by many other players, and echo the
ambitions of the Commission in its European ‘Competitiveness Compass’ (see
EUROPE 13568/1
<https://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-2194866194-3b6ec36a961584f152aebeaf5c47da353272bbde92ae621a>
).
To see the statement: https://aeur.eu/f/fax
<https://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-2194866172-3b6ec36a961584f152aebeaf5c47da353272bbde92ae621a>
(Original version in French by Isalia Stieffatre)
SECURITY - DEFENCE: European leaders to discuss future of defence
On Monday 3 February, the Heads of State or Government of the EU Member
States will meet at the Palais d'Egmont in Brussels for their first defence
‘retreat’.
According to one European official, two principles underpin the meeting: the
EU must assume greater responsibility for its own defence, and there must be
a shared interest in greater cooperation at EU level. While no decision is
expected, the discussion should help to “prepare, shape and provide
guidelines for future decisions”, he added. The leaders will discuss defence
again at their summit at the end of June.
After a discussion with the President of the European Parliament, Roberta
Metsola, the Heads of State or Government will discuss the geopolitical
context, in particular relations with the United States, a few days after
President Donald Trump took office. In this context, Mr Trump’s comments and
intentions regarding Greenland will be highlighted by the Danish Prime
Minister, Mette Frederiksen. Military support for Ukraine will also be
addressed.
The leaders will be joined for lunch by the Secretary General of the North
Atlantic Treaty Organisation, Mark Rutte, for talks on strengthening EU-NATO
cooperation. 23 EU Member States are also members of the organisation.
The afternoon will be devoted to European defence. Leaders will discuss
capacity needs. “For the first time, the EU27 will be able to discuss and
have a clear vision of which capabilities should be prioritised and on which
to focus”, explained one official. The question of capabilities is
“something that the Europeans cannot decide on their own and which is linked
to NATO”, said a diplomat, who pointed out that the Alliance would define
the priority capabilities for the Allies, probably next June. And he added:
“Europe’s collective security is first and foremost a NATO issue”.
Several sources stated that it was not a question of defining a list of
specific projects. Areas such as air defence and maritime security, critical
infrastructure protection, drones, missiles and anti-missile systems could
be highlighted.
One European diplomat felt that the EU’s added value lay in its industrial
policy. “We need to strengthen the defence industry in line with our
capacity requirements. Industry is the EU’s business”, he explained,
pointing out that Europe did not have the industrial and technological base
to provide the capacities.
Discussions on financing. Although Europe has increased defence spending in
recent years, it still needs to be further increased, according to a senior
official. “It’s not a question of if, but of how”, he added. The leaders
will therefore discuss the financing of defence acquisitions and the
development of the European defence industry.
On Friday, a diplomat was keen to point out that it was above all necessary
for EU Member States that are members of NATO to respect the objectives of
spending 2% of their GDP on defence. Seven Member States have not yet done
so. According to this diplomat, this would free up €60 billion.
At the March European Council, leaders called on the Commission to explore
all options for mobilising funding. These are still awaited and could be
included in the ‘White Paper’ on defence, due on 19 March, which will take
account of the views of the Heads of State and Government.
Funding through the current Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) - be it
the ASAP, EDIRPA, European Defence Fund and soon as a matter of course,
EDIP, defence programmes - or other funds that could be used for defence,
such as those linked to cohesion, will be addressed. The targets for defence
in the next MFF could be mentioned, even if the funds would not be disbursed
until 2029 or 2030.
The Heads of State or Government will discuss other ways of funding defence.
Some would be in favour of European bonds to finance defence. The subject of
a common debt is also on the table, as is the use of the European Stability
Mechanism, but on Friday one diplomat described these plans as
“irresponsible”.
The question of exempting defence spending from the calculation of Member
States’ deficits has also been raised by some.
Strengthening the role of the EIB. The Member States also want the European
Investment Bank (EIB) to contribute to this effort. It has already extended
the scope of its activities by amending its requirements for dual-use
projects (see EUROPE 13407/7
<https://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-2194866182-3b6ec36a961584f152aebeaf5c47da353272bbde92ae621a>
), introducing a new credit line for financing SMEs in the security and
defence sector and setting up a one-stop shop for security and defence
financing.
On 30 January, the leaders of 19 European countries (Belgium, Croatia,
Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany,
Greece, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Romania,
Slovakia, Spain and Sweden) wrote to call on the Bank to explore other ways
of playing an even greater role in financing investment and mobilising
private finance for the security and defence sector.
These Member States are proposing to reassess the list of excluded
activities, to adjust the lending policy in order to increase the volume of
financing available in the field of security and defence, and to study the
issue of debt earmarked for the financing of security and defence projects.
The ‘environmental, social and governance’ criteria and the taxonomy prevent
many private funds and banks from financing defence, said one diplomat,
calling for the ESG rules on defence investment to be lifted.
See the letter: https://aeur.eu/f/fbj
<https://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-2194866176-3b6ec36a961584f152aebeaf5c47da353272bbde92ae621a>
Finally, over dinner, the Heads of State or Government will discuss security
and defence cooperation between the EU and the UK with the British Prime
Minister, Keir Starmer. This is the first time since Brexit that the British
Prime Minister has met with his 27 counterparts from the EU Member States. A
few days ago, EU High Representative Kaja Kallas said that an EU/UK
agreement on security and defence would be a “logical next step” in their
relationship (see EUROPE 13563/8
<https://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-2194866188-3b6ec36a961584f152aebeaf5c47da353272bbde92ae621a>
). (Original version in French by Camille-Cerise Gessant)
SECTORAL POLICIES: Facing implementation and ambition gaps, G20 countries
are not on track to meet Paris Agreement targets
The new edition of the ‘Global Energy and Climate Outlook’ (GECO 2024),
published by the European Commission on Friday 31 January, shows that the
world is still not on track to meet its climate targets due to existing
implementation gaps between the current policies of G20 economies and their
commitments.
There are also ambition gaps, as commitments set out in the ‘Nationally
Determined Contributions (NDCs) are not enough to achieve the 1.5°C
trajectory set by the Paris Agreement.
“Whilst emissions peak in the coming years in all scenarios, the world is
currently (...) on track for 2.6°C of warming by the end of the century”,
the study points out.
However, if countries fully implement their NDC targets, this increase could
be limited to 2.3°C and “mid-century decarbonisation pledges [could] lower
this increase to 1.8°C”.
The study indicates that the current decade is essential for keeping the
1.5°C target possible, as is aligning the new cycle of NDCs expected before
COP30 in Belém in November.
The European Union’s NDC will derive from the 2040 greenhouse gas emissions
reduction target on which the co-legislators are due to agree later this
year. However, the deadline seems short, since the European Commission has
yet to present its legislative proposal and an indicative date was not
included in the agenda set out in the ‘Competitiveness Compass’ published on
29 January (see EUROPE 13569/9
<https://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-2194866196-3b6ec36a961584f152aebeaf5c47da353272bbde92ae621a>
).
However, a Commission spokesperson confirmed to the European press on 31
January that “the plan” remained to present the EU’s NDC in time for the
COP.
The GECO 2024 study presents a set of 1.5°C-aligned indicators for 2035
consisting of (1) producing clean electricity, (2) electrifying end-uses and
improving energy efficiency, (3) decarbonising sectors where it is difficult
to reduce emissions, and (4) scaling-up negative emissions.
By 2035, according to the analysis, each G20 country should produce at least
50% of its electricity from non-fossil fuels and ensure that electricity
accounts for at least 35% of its final energy consumption, with continuous
improvements in energy efficiency. In addition, they should implement carbon
capture and storage (CCS) to deal with around 10% of industrial emissions.
To see the study: https://aeur.eu/f/fbc
<https://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-2194866174-3b6ec36a961584f152aebeaf5c47da353272bbde92ae621a>
(Original version in French by Pauline Denys)
SECTORAL POLICIES: Twelve EU countries urge European Commission to
accelerate investigations into electoral interference via social networks
In a letter sent on Friday 31 January, twelve Member States have called on
the European Commission to take action against “interference [...] during
key electoral events” by third countries, in particular by speeding up the
investigations currently underway under the Digital Services Act (DSA) (see
EUROPE 13560/4
<https://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-2194866184-3b6ec36a961584f152aebeaf5c47da353272bbde92ae621a>
).
The signatories include France and Germany, who will be holding
parliamentary elections on 23 February, and who are already receiving
increased attention from national and European authorities (see EUROPE
13565/26
<https://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-2194866190-3b6ec36a961584f152aebeaf5c47da353272bbde92ae621a>
).
A stress test was carried out this Friday with the European Commission,
several online platforms – Google (YouTube), LinkedIn, Microsoft, Meta
(Facebook, Instagram), Snapchat, TikTok and X – as well as the German
authorities and civil society organisations in order to prepare certain
“fictitious scenarios aimed at identifying and reducing potential
election-related risks” that “could pose a risk to civic discourse and
electoral processes”.
According to Commission spokesperson Thomas Régnier, a response to the
current investigations will be announced “ in due course”, but the current
processes will not be accelerated. “It takes time, so we have to be careful.
When we are ready, we will take the necessary measures”, he declared.
In a letter obtained by Agence Europe, the twelve countries “urge” the
Commission to make full use of the powers conferred by the DSA. They also
call on the EU to put forward “robust proposals” to strengthen the means of
action at European level, by setting up a ‘shield for democracy’ (see EUROPE
13567/5
<https://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-2194866192-3b6ec36a961584f152aebeaf5c47da353272bbde92ae621a>
) and drawing up “individual sanctions”, in order to “send a firm signal to
those involved in destabilising activities”.
See the letter from the twelve EU countries: https://aeur.eu/f/fbk
<https://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-2194866178-3b6ec36a961584f152aebeaf5c47da353272bbde92ae621a>
(Original version in French by Isalia Stieffatre, with Mathieu Bion)
COPYRIGHT AGENCE EUROPE, OUR CONTENT IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR RE-DISSEMINATION!
Agence Europe is only responsible for its own content.
As current events evolve, Agence Europe sometimes has to update its content
in online versions.
www.ebsummits.eu
<https://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-2194866200-3b6ec36a961584f152aebeaf5c47da353272bbde92ae621a>
<https://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-2194866204-3b6ec36a961584f152aebeaf5c47da353272bbde92ae621a>
<https://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-2194866198-3b6ec36a961584f152aebeaf5c47da353272bbde92ae621a>
<https://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-2194866202-3b6ec36a961584f152aebeaf5c47da353272bbde92ae621a>
Update your profile
<https://cdn.flxml.eu/page/profile/eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJFZERTQSJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJyZXR1cm4vcHJvZmlsZSIsImlhdCI6MTczODY1MjQ0NC45NTc1MTcsImFpZCI6NDA5MTAsImNpZCI6MTIyNTgsImNhbWlkIjoyMTQ5MjM1MH0.9-8YlTVTCy6xxBuxTHukdhM4crxxeNHy252ucvjC_qpq72fcckXhPWdJ6AyYWTlaa5W-y3vJUFq4p-5__eFpAA>
- Unsubscribe
<https://cdn.flxml.eu/page/profile/eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJFZERTQSJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJyZXR1cm4vcHJvZmlsZSIsImlhdCI6MTczODY1MjQ0NC45NTc1MTcsImFpZCI6NDA5MTAsImNpZCI6MTIyNTgsImNhbWlkIjoyMTQ5MjM1MH0.9-8YlTVTCy6xxBuxTHukdhM4crxxeNHy252ucvjC_qpq72fcckXhPWdJ6AyYWTlaa5W-y3vJUFq4p-5__eFpAA>
<https://cdn.flxml.eu/t-3b6ec36a961584f152aebeaf5c47da353272bbde92ae621a0>